Why would they write the amendment then?Anchor babies weren't a thing when the Constitution was written.
Why would they write the amendment then?Anchor babies weren't a thing when the Constitution was written.
I think it’s as simple as “who would you rather want to share a subway car with tomorrow”No, I wasn't.
I think Penny "got away with murder" - or at least manslaughter. But he's an attractive, likeable young white guy who probably charmed the jury on the stand and the vic was a crazy, black guy.
I thought it likely the jury would be hung. Sounds like the jury members who wanted to convict gave in faster than the jury members who wanted to acquit in the jury chamber. You don't have to be a genius to predict how that would play out. And even the jury members who wanted to convict probably felt a little sorry for Penny and felt "Whatever!" about letting him go free.
Not the first time that a white man killed a black man in the US and walked out of the courtroom a free man. Not the last.
I really wish it was that simple…but if you are that simple, you have already predecided.I think it’s as simple as “who would you rather want to share a subway car with tomorrow”
It certainly wasn't written to allow Mexicans to have anchor babies in the US.Why would they write the amendment then?
This is an example of a crazy delusional radical left synopsis of the case.No, I wasn't.
I think Penny "got away with murder" - or at least manslaughter. But he's an attractive, likeable young white guy who probably charmed the jury on the stand and the vic was a crazy, black guy.
I thought it likely the jury would be hung. Sounds like the jury members who wanted to convict gave in faster than the jury members who wanted to acquit in the jury chamber. You don't have to be a genius to predict how that would play out. And even the jury members who wanted to convict probably felt a little sorry for Penny and felt "Whatever!" about letting him go free.
Not the first time that a white man killed a black man in the US and walked out of the courtroom a free man. Not the last.
Why not? They are extremely valuable to our society. They really good workers for all construction related jobs. Or service industry.It certainly wasn't written to allow Mexicans to have anchor babies in the US.
Didn't the US government ask the mafia for help during WWII?The new immigrants are pretty much the same as the Jews and Italians and Poles who came to the States in the 1890's. Poor desperate people who wanted a fresh start.
You think the folks who started the mafia were squeaky clean????
So you admittedly don't read and don't remember, but it's my fault you don't know what to respond to? Lol!Which points were those, Skoob?
At a certain point, I just skim your crap and don't bother too much.
Walk down a street in Manhattan after dark. I’m sure someone like you is an easy target.Crime at a 50 year low. Crime rate higher for us citizens v immigrants. Where are the millions of criminals?
America is not here to help poor immigrants . They are full and have to help their citizens first.The new immigrants are pretty much the same as the Jews and Italians and Poles who came to the States in the 1890's. Poor desperate people who wanted a fresh start.
You think the folks who started the mafia were squeaky clean????
I guess we'll see how this all plays out. Keep in mind, there will be mid-term elections in 2026 that could be seen as a referendum of Trump's policies and actions. Could there be a "Blue wave" that gives the Dems both houses and keeps Trump in check? We'll see.Yup TDS is alive and well despite most of the US voting public disagreeing with you.
You seem bothered.
Is that true?
Are you ignoring the couple points I shared or is the reality of that fact too real for you to handle?
I think what he means is that a huge chunk of American's back then were children of immigrants, so anchor babies themselves.I'm thinking not...
The ol' "we'll see" futile comeback when all else has failed.I guess we'll see how this all plays out. Keep in mind, there will be mid-term elections in 2026 that could be seen as a referendum of Trump's policies and actions. Could there be a "Blue wave" that gives the Dems both houses and keeps Trump in check? We'll see.
I mean, it would be great if they actually helped their citizens....but that sounds like ....socialism! And, they US only believes in socialism for big businesses...Walk down a street in Manhattan after dark. I’m sure someone like you is an easy target.
Don’t believe the media unt
America is not here to help poor immigrants . They are full and have to help their citizens first.
Trudeau’s immigration plan destroyed Canadas economy and so many people are suffering.
Why don’t we cool it with the immigration for the foreseeable future.
Just Jews, Poles and Italians. They were the immigrant groups of the time.It certainly wasn't written to allow Mexicans to have anchor babies in the US.
Actually no.Walk down a street in Manhattan after dark. I’m sure someone like you is an easy target.
Don’t believe the media unt
America is not here to help poor immigrants . They are full and have to help their citizens first.
Trudeau’s immigration plan destroyed Canadas economy and so many people are suffering.
Why don’t we cool it with the immigration for the foreseeable future.
Politics is like a pendulum. It has swung to the right, but it'll come back to the left soon enough. And, if Trump does what he pledged to do, it'll tank the US and global economy pretty damn quick. But, as we all know, his word is worthless...so it is a wait and see. Because, he's unhinged, not very smart and is easily manipulated...So, it will always depend on who speaks to him last before he makes a decision...The ol' "we'll see" futile comeback when all else has failed.
Was that same view taken when the Dems were frantically trying to keep him from running for office? Did they say "let's not sabotage him and we'll see what the people want"?
Nope.
Funny...you can't form a few sentences without filling them with prophecy. Lol!Politics is like a pendulum. It has swung to the right, but it'll come back to the left soon enough. And, if Trump does what he pledged to do, it'll tank the US and global economy pretty damn quick. But, as we all know, his word is worthless...so it is a wait and see. Because, he's unhinged, not very smart and is easily manipulated...So, it will always depend on who speaks to him last before he makes a decision...
But their parents came in from ports of entry legally.I think what he means is that a huge chunk of American's back then were children of immigrants, so anchor babies themselves.
Sure, i believe only 60% were native born in what would become the USA in 1787. Many had parents from overseas. Apparently half the Europeans who came before 1776 were indentured servants (thus once they completed their terms of servitude became free). Plus slaves were a big chunk of the population. Apparently 4m people back then at 1790 census.I'm thinking not...