Obsession Massage

It's Quiet

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
Hezbollah folded and took the ceasefire route...it's only a matter of time 'til Lebanon rejects them. If the Palestinians want peace, the only wawy out is to reject Hamas. This will be Biden's bright legacy after giving the go signal for Ukraine....but Trump will fix that most likely.
An Israeli ceasefire isn't worth printing on paper.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
18,387
9,370
113
An Israeli ceasefire isn't worth printing on paper.
See here's the problem with you.... I'm stating Lebanese Civilians and Gazans civilians are better off not catering to Hamas and Hezbollah... I'm not against civilians franky, I'm against terrorists. I'm also against settlers who commit violence on Palestinians and Lebanese.... in my eyes they're no different from terrorists....you on the other hand is Hamas and Hezbollah are ok...Israelis are not...
 

rompin

Active member
Mar 28, 2007
218
95
28
perhaps the left is still shell shocked by the size of Trumps victory
and the right is shell shocked by the size of Trumps 25% tariff threat.

Brian Lilley (Sun columnist) quoted Trump as saying "you have to fix your boarders or face 25% tariffs"
if true, i suggest we fix the boarders
Are they paying room and board ? are they bored and waiting at the border
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,100
4,488
113
Are they paying room and board ? are they bored and waiting at the border
good one

you busted me on the border
spelling has never been my strong suit and i type quickly
normally i am not impressed with internet spelling police, however your response was clever / funny
 
  • Like
Reactions: rompin

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
See here's the problem with you.... I'm stating Lebanese Civilians and Gazans civilians are better off not catering to Hamas and Hezbollah... I'm not against civilians franky, I'm against terrorists. I'm also against settlers who commit violence on Palestinians and Lebanese.... in my eyes they're no different from terrorists....you on the other hand is Hamas and Hezbollah are ok...Israelis are not...
Settlers commit terrorism on Palestinians as part of state policy, as B'tselem has detailed for years.
Israeli commits terrorism in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria, deliberately targeting civilians.

If you were really against terrorism you'd join me in calling for both sides to be held to the law.
You'd be supporting ICC and ICJ charges on both sides and UN resolutions demanding action from both sides.

But you don't, then you declare you think you're not biased.
That's largely because you refuse to admit that the illegal occupation of Palestine is still the real source of the strife, that both Hamas and Hezbollah are responding to the continuation of a 76 year long, illegal occupation. That puts Israel as the instigator, which you won't accept.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
18,387
9,370
113
Settlers commit terrorism on Palestinians as part of state policy, as B'tselem has detailed for years.
Israeli commits terrorism in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria, deliberately targeting civilians.

If you were really against terrorism you'd join me in calling for both sides to be held to the law.
You'd be supporting ICC and ICJ charges on both sides and UN resolutions demanding action from both sides.

But you don't, then you declare you think you're not biased.
That's largely because you refuse to admit that the illegal occupation of Palestine is still the real source of the strife, that both Hamas and Hezbollah are responding to the continuation of a 76 year long, illegal occupation. That puts Israel as the instigator, which you won't accept.
If you're against terrorism you should be advocating Gazans to reject Hamas, Lebanon to reject Hezbollah. I advocate for Israel to punish settlers who commit violence against Palestinians. You don't.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
If you're against terrorism you should be advocating Gazans to reject Hamas, Lebanon to reject Hezbollah. I advocate for Israel to punish settlers who commit violence against Palestinians. You don't.
Israel doesn't punish settlers who commit terrorism, its state policy to aid them. The IDF quite regularly backs up their attacks.

You want Palestinians to reject Hamas and Hezbollah but don't want Israel to reject their war criminal leadership?
If you back the law, back both sides being held to it, like I do.

Why do you refuse to admit the illegal occupation of Palestine is the problem?
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,880
11,792
113
Toronto
This is trolling.
Please stop it.
No it's not. You get into more arguments (and more nasty ones) than anybody else. Do you not think that when you accuse dozens and dozens and dozens of people of supporting genocide that they are not going to be offended and push back. Of course they are going to and that is why when I say that you foment discord and are a shit disturber I am correct. It's a clear fact.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
No it's not. You get into more arguments (and more nasty ones) than anybody else. Do you not think that when you accuse dozens and dozens and dozens of people of supporting genocide that they are not going to be offended and push back. Of course they are going to and that is why when I say that you foment discord and are a shit disturber I am correct. It's a clear fact.
You act like its me making the accusations of genocide, not the UN, ICC and ICJ.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,880
11,792
113
Toronto
I don't report posts to the mods, but I'm very tempted over this post.
Retract it and apologize.
But what you actually do do repeatedly and consistently is to post the most disgusting and horrid pictures of mutilated, disfigured, bleeding children. It's sickening and crosses the lines of acceptability. And those pictures are not even verifiable of being current or even from Gaza. You do not have a reputation for honesty, so how can anybody believe that they are what you claim they are without verification. And BTW, it was not I who coined that term of your pics. I don't know who it was but I conscripted it and it was at least 6 months ago and so why the sudden outrage now?

Delete all those pictures, don't post any more of them and there will be no more need for that term to be used again. And I'm not even asking for an apology.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,880
11,792
113
Toronto
Shack went further and inferred it was sexual preference, that's disgusting.
Too funny. So when NAD is referring to an accepted term such as "Food Porn" it means that people want to fuck their food? LOL.

Using "porn" in reference to food or dead children is a metaphor, Geno. It infers an unhealthy obsession. Anybody can see that. You are obsessed with posting these sorts of images over and over. You should stop.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
.,...and yet there are many more making the accusations that these organizations are politically (anti-sematic, anti-western etc..) motivated and it's not genocide. Because it's clear that it's not. If the Israeli's wanted a genocide, you would KNOW it. They're not incompetent boobs like the Arabs.

Weird how the ICC has only looked into two huh?

View attachment 381471
Now you're at the point where you are trying to argue that its genocide, but just not a big one.

Its clear that Israel is working hard so we don't know the numbers.
They've killed more journalists than any real war over the last 100 years to stop news getting out.
Which is why you still think the number of dead is around 45,000, despite being at about 40,000 for almost a year of bombing and starvation.

In the past Israel worked hard to not kill so many that the world would be outraged, this time they are only caring about the US and its support.
So sure, they could kill more but would even Biden and Harris back them if the did?

If the Lancet numbers are close, you're looking at about 200,000-300,000 which would put the Gaza genocide second only to Rwanda.
Which is why the WHO, Amnesty and all human rights organizations also aren't allowed into Gaza. They would count the dead as well.

 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,880
11,792
113
Toronto
And claiming people hold fake views?
Such as the hundreds of times that you falsely claim people are supporting genocide for no other reason than they disagree with you on some secondary issue.

You put words into other people's on a daily basis.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
But what you actually do do repeatedly and consistently is to post the most disgusting and horrid pictures of mutilated, disfigured, bleeding children. It's sickening and crosses the lines of acceptability. And those pictures are not even verifiable of being current or even from Gaza. You do not have a reputation for honesty, so how can anybody believe that they are what you claim they are without verification. And BTW, it was not I who coined that term of your pics. I don't know who it was but I conscripted it and it was at least 6 months ago and so why the sudden outrage now?

Delete all those pictures, don't post any more of them and there will be no more need for that term to be used again. And I'm not even asking for an apology.
What is disgusting is that you continue to support Israel through genocide.
If you don't want to see the photos call for a ceasefire.
Israel has killed enough kids that if one were to post the photo of one a day it would take 40 years to post them all, even based on just the Health Ministry numbers.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
Such as the hundreds of times that you falsely claim people are supporting genocide for no other reason than they disagree with you on some secondary issue.

You put words into other people's on a daily basis.
Its not a false accusation.
The ICC has issued warrants, the reports are clear and well documented and willful ignorance is not a defence.

45% of Canada believes Israel is committing genocide.
Only 23% disagree.

terb politics forum slants more right than Canada.
Half of Canada backs the claim, that beats out your 'dozens and dozens and dozens'.

 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,880
11,792
113
Toronto
Settlers commit terrorism on Palestinians as part of state policy
Which act did the Knesset pass to make it state policy. They can't make it policy without passing such an act.

That's largely because you refuse to admit that the illegal occupation of Palestine is still the real source of the strife,
The actual source is the refusal of Arab leaders' to accept the existence of an Israeli state since even before 1948.

that both Hamas and Hezbollah are responding to the continuation of a 76 year long, illegal occupation. That puts Israel as the instigator, which you won't accept.
It's "interesting" (I could use a different term) that you repeatedly claim to be against terrorism on both sides, but when it comes to the Oct.7 terrorist attack by Hamas, here is a perfect example of you attempting to justify it.

All of that, yet not a single word uttered admitting that Hezbollah and Hamas' are terrorists. It's all one-sided to you.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,880
11,792
113
Toronto
If you're against terrorism you should be advocating Gazans to reject Hamas, Lebanon to reject Hezbollah. I advocate for Israel to punish settlers who commit violence against Palestinians. You don't.
There are so many holes in his claims of being objective. One could almost think that there is a teeny weeny bit of hypocrisy in there. (I didn't want to say a teenie weenie.)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,563
29,816
113
Which act did the Knesset pass to make it state policy. They can't make it policy without passing such an act.
You think Rwanda had a policy paper on genocide? I posted the B'tselem link, read it and tell me where its wrong.
Otherwise you're posting from ignorance, again.

The actual source is the refusal of Arab leaders' to accept the existence of an Israeli state since even before 1948.
No, the source is your own definition of zionism that states they would take Palestine and create a country called 'Israel' on that land.


It's "interesting" (I could use a different term) that you repeatedly claim to be against terrorism on both sides, but when it comes to the Oct.7 terrorist attack by Hamas, here is a perfect example of you attempting to justify it.

All of that, yet not a single word uttered admitting that Hezbollah and Hamas' are terrorists. It's all one-sided to you.
Palestinians have the right to self defence against an illegal occupation, including the use of violence.
That is their right, but they do not have the right to target civilians, neither does Israel.

Which is why I keep backing taking both sides to the law.
You still refuse to admit that the occupation of Palestine was and is wrong and that the ICJ and UN have ordered Israel to end it.

Why do you back clear war crimes whenever Israel commits them?

 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts