Right.
But according to richaceg, they wouldnt be called enemy of the state because of their citizenship even though their crime is more severe.
Trump ready to use American military on US soil. - So much to do before January 21st.
- Thread starter Valcazar
- Start date
But according to richaceg, they wouldnt be called enemy of the state because of their citizenship even though their crime is more severe.
You're splitting hairs.
Serial killers are enemies of everyone around them.
But they're citizens so they get locked up. There is nowhere to deport them. If we could, we would.
So which is it then? Did the mean Lefties saying mean things about MAGA cause Trump to win? Or not?
Anyway, I don’t think it matters. Regardless of the cause, America is on its way to becoming a fascist dictatorship. I don’t find all of the angst and finger-pointing on the Left to be of much value. It’s kinda like when the Titanic hit the iceberg: regardless of whose fault it was the outcome remained the same.
We'll see, I still think that rump is too senile to remember what he wanted to do and his team are all such wackos they won't be able to agree on what time to meet.
Trump will enact some tariffs, that's the easiest thing, then all his supporters are going to turn on him once they realize what that means.
It becomes political when governors are trying to fight the mandate of executive branch to remove illegal immigrants....
More MAGA snowflake, cupcake, lil' buttercup tears a'flowing.
"Boo-hoo-hoo, they're so mean to us. Waaaaaaaaah."
The majority of his supporters, the MAGATWATS are part of his cult. He can do no wrong, they will cheer him on even if they can't afford their home and sleeping in a tent, they will scream Trump is the best in the whole wide world.
Are you calling the majority of the American voting public racist and cruel?
It sounds like you are.
Only someone crazy and undemocratic would make that claim.
Or is this one of those times where you make a claim and then a few posts later conveniently forget that you made the claim?
Only someone crazy would do that.
Ladies & gentlemen...I present the Shaquille strawman argument.
Seems like you're more concerned about the "how" rather than being more concerned about the "why & when".
You're only more concerned about the "how" because it's more about the person you just don't like, and questioning the "how" is really all you have at this point.
Did I get that right?
Strawman.
You'd be silly to claim that everyone who voted for Trump voted for mass deportations.
Many are single issue voters.
Others vote against woke.
Still others vote against Dems because they were disappointed.
Jews and Muslims voted because of Gaza.
Then there are others who simply vote Republican.
And then there are the ones who are racist or cruel or both.
To top it off I called his policy racist and cruel.
But of course youd deny this because you are a professional mental gymnast.
Last edited:
No.
The "why" is a given. And the "when" is a "whenever".
The "how" is the most important question and has nothing to do with Trump. I've given you a suggestion. Clearly the current administration wants an increase in effort. So that means increased budget and manpower.
The underlying note is that Trumpo-Dumbo is a senile, grifting moron who will talk and rant, but never do anything effective - just like "The Wall". This is "The Wall 2.0".
Yeah sure...
His most significant campaign promise somehow gets overlooked by someone against mass deportation that votes for him anyway? Not likely.
If you believe that to be true, prove it.
Or better yet...come back a few posts later and claim you didn't say any of this and we'll move on.
Can we let him actually get in office before the usual attacks begin?
Where's Biden btw?
You see this is why you guys are being called snowflakes or "the loonie left". When you hear Trump is using the military to do the mass deportations...you somehow think he's gonna round up these illegal immigrants and put them on a
concentration camp lol .. I'm pretty sure he's gonna round them up and send them home....
What is a straw man argument?
A straw man argument, sometimes called a straw person argument or spelled strawman argument, is the logical fallacy of distorting an opposing position into an extreme version of itself and then arguing against that extreme version. In creating a straw man argument, the arguer strips the opposing point of view of any nuance and often misrepresents it in a negative light.
The straw man fallacy is an informal fallacy, which means that the flaw lies with the arguer’s method of arguing rather than the flaws of the argument itself. The straw man fallacy avoids the opponent’s actual argument and instead argues against an inaccurate caricature of it. By doing this, the straw man fallacy is a fallacy of relevance, because with it the arguer doesn’t engage with the relevant components of their opposer’s position.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/straw-man-fallacy/
