Kamala's Fox interview was a disaster!!

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,141
59,036
113
I'm not sure you are terribly agile at jumping in and out of threads days after the fact.

More importantly, sometimes sarcasm is just sarcasm. It doesn't have to have any particular political relevance.
It was obviously sarcasm.
I just don't know what Jimmy Carter had to do with anything Mitch is saying.
Or Mitch's style of posting.

Clearly there is a joke you think you are making there, but I don't get it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
20,610
7,385
113

Wow. Someone at Kamala’s rally said "Jesus is Lord" and she snapped back, "Oh you guys are at the wrong rally. I think you meant to go to the smaller one down the street." This insult to Christians comes right after she became the first Presidential candidate to skip the Catholic Al Smith Dinner since Walter Mondale many, many decades ago. Mondale soon after lost EVERY state except for one. Clearly Kamala doesn’t respect Christians, our beliefs and most importantly, our Savior. Every Christian needs to remember this when they vote and share this with their friends. On Election Day, let’s show politicians what happens when they treat Christianity like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,141
59,036
113
My response is not really directed at you. There has to be a clip without edits where we can follow these words directly for ourselves.
You seem to have been presented with numerous such clips.

But sure, it was a public appearance.

Here's the clip about handling it with the military.
(Fox has it but it won't play for me.)

Here is the question and answer on the follow up where he specifies he means Schiff and Pelosi.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
6,937
1,780
113
It was obviously sarcasm.
I just don't know what Jimmy Carter had to do with anything Mitch is saying.
Or Mitch's style of posting.

Clearly there is a joke you think you are making there, but I don't get it.
Ok sorry.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
6,937
1,780
113
You seem to have been presented with numerous such clips.

But sure, it was a public appearance.

Here's the clip about handling it with the military.
(Fox has it but it won't play for me.)

Here is the question and answer on the follow up where he specifies he means Schiff and Pelosi.

Trump after he criticizes Schiff and Pelosi: I'm not threatening anybody. Sure he uses the phrase "enemy from within".

The reference to the National Guard is mentioned in context to election unrest.

I think you actually know what I am getting at. Fine, post a clip but cue up the egregious statement and/or quote Trump's exact words in context. Don't tell me he's sending the military for Schiff and Pelosi. In regards to other posters, don't post a commentator who spends ten minutes telling me what Trump said or what they think Trump means.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
6,937
1,780
113
So you and K Douglas are both fine with sending the military to "deal" with Adam Schiff and the Pelosis and all those Democrats Trump deems a suitable target?
Lunatics like Shifty shift as an example of the "enemies from within"

what part of this don't you understand?

Yeah so........I find Schiff's handling of the Intelligence Committee to have been dangerously political and objectionable.

Where's the I will send the military to deal with Schiff part?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
6,937
1,780
113
That's not quite correct.
They get more cautious when they think the downside is greater than the upside.
When you are ahead and have things in the bag, everything is more downside, so candidates give fewer interviews.
(This is also why front runners tend to want to limit debates.)

But it really is just downside/upside.
Trump has been a disaster in his latest appearances.
That's in friendly environments for the most part (clearly putting him in a townhall on Univision was an error by the campaign).
Keeping him out of places he can fuck things up is good strategy.

It is running out the clock.
But it might just mean they think it is close and he can fuck things up, not they they like their position and are protecting a lead.
We really can't say.
I can agree with all things you said here and still believe Trump's team is comfortable where they are at two weeks out from the election.

I don't think either candidate is a great communicator. I would give the edge to Kamala. Kamala connects very well with certain demographics. Some people like Trump's bluntness and are okay with his ineloquence. As always in a close election, I expect both candidates' words to be sliced, diced and puréed by partisan commentators. It will only intensify as the clock ticks down.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,129
3,107
113
What scrutiny is needed?
It's a non-issue.
Was that the sound of a broom sweeping something under the rug?
If you were actually following the conversation, it was in response to the remark that Trump is in essence avoiding opportunities to debate with her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,129
3,107
113
Trumpland is one giant scurrilous book. Fine. We all got it.

We want someone to write about Biden's last year. Now that book will sell.

However, Democrats as a group appear to have a more disclipined code of silence. Trump is not a darling of the Republican establishment so he's an easier target. A Republican operative's post-Trump career will not be affected too much by taking digs in a book.

With a Biden book, somebody might break and want to make a cash grab. A tell all of who was engineering the cover-up, the abrupt switch to Kamala, Kamala's troubles with the Biden team and so on. There will certainly be a big, first out of the gate advantage for the first book.
1729436843711.png
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
20,610
7,385
113
LMAO


If you want to understand how badly Kamala Harris is doing in this race, all you need to do is look at this clip from MSNBC. MSNBC said the quiet part out loud here, they are deathly afraid that Donald Trump will invoke the insurrection act and the riots that are going to hit our streets after he wins will be stopped. How do I know this? They always tell you what they are going to do. I have an article from The Guardian about the wargames that the blob did in preparation for a second Donald Trump victory. One of the scenarios in those wargames was what would happen if Fox News lies and says there are dangerous, protests, and riots outside when really it’s just the American people rising up against a fascist. That was the exact verbiage of the game. You can read it for yourself. The eventual outcome of the war game was there was nothing they could do to stop an elected president from invoking the insurrection act. This clip is Mika admitting that they are terrified Trump will in fact do just that when they try to deploy their color revolution post Trump victory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts