I think they would love nothing better, but realize that it's a very, very long term plan that's on the same scale as the Eglinton LRT.I doubt many of their leadership actually care about destroying the West.
I think they would love nothing better, but realize that it's a very, very long term plan that's on the same scale as the Eglinton LRT.I doubt many of their leadership actually care about destroying the West.
I think you mean "alternate fact". Killing terrorists who massacre 1,200 and/or launch thousands of missiles at you and then hide among civilians is not ethnic cleansing. It's called self-defense.Fact is that Netanyahoo is ethnically cleansing his neighbours and the US is helping him do it.... Lebanon is next.
Fact, not theory.What a crazy theory.
Who supplies Hamas and Hezbollah? Iran.Iran hasn't attacked a country in 300 years and Israel has nukes and the backing of the US.
The countries in the middle east that have been destroyed include Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen and Lebanon. All of those have been destroyed by the US and US 'allies' like Israel and Saudi Arabia.
None by Iran.
That is simply like a new chapter of the KKK opening up. Same people. Same ideas. New name. Nothing changed.Hezbollah came into existence after the first Israeli invasion.
So you are saying that it had always previously been the Arabs that were the terrorists. We're making progress.They did not give back what they took in Palestine, Lebanon and Syria. Stop lying.
You are the terrorists now, rich.
Except for self-defense.Israel has no status to be in Palestine.
The discussion was about this part of the charter.Israel has no status to be in Palestine.
The UN and ICJ say get the fuck out.
InaneSo you are saying that it had always previously been the Arabs that were the terrorists. We're making progress.
Poorly educatedThe discussion was about this part of the charter.
Uwauwa said:
“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations,” states Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
Israel, as a member of the UN has a right to self-defense. Gaza is not a member. Based on this, Israel has more of a right to self-defense than Gaza.
What is Israel's long term plan?I think they would love nothing better, but realize that it's a very, very long term plan that's on the same scale as the Eglinton LRT.
Killing civilians intentionally is terrorism.I think you mean "alternate fact". Killing terrorists who massacre 1,200 and/or launch thousands of missiles at you and then hide among civilians is not ethnic cleansing. It's called self-defense.
Who does Israel sell weapons to?Fact, not theory.
Who supplies Hamas and Hezbollah? Iran.
From whom do Hamas and Hezbollah take orders? Iran.
Where do Hamas and Hezbollah leaders go to get assassinated by Mossad? Iran.
Who is trying to build nuclear capability as another tool of terror? Iran.
So you are saying that it had always previously been the Arabs that were the terrorists. We're making progress.
Every accusation by a Ziontologist is a confessionThat is simply like a new chapter of the KKK opening up. Same people. Same ideas. New name. Nothing changed.
Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Iran and Yemen are all UN members, you just argued they all have the right to attack Israel now. Great work.The discussion was about this part of the charter.
Uwauwa said:
“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations,” states Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
Israel, as a member of the UN has a right to self-defense. Gaza is not a member. Based on this, Israel has more of a right to self-defense than Gaza.
Iran gives weapons to the 3 H's. The US gives weapons to Israel. Both Iran and US need to stop. They are fueling the fire.Who does the US sell weapons to?
The US is responsible for 40% of global weapons sales.Iran gives weapons to the 3 H's. The US gives weapons to Israel. Both Iran and US need to stop. They are fueling the fire.
Yes. I should have also drawn the distinction when I said both Iran and the US needs to stop. There is an actual difference in that one is trade and the other is covert arming of terror groups. Still, there should be limits or conditions placed so there is no escalation of hostilities.The US is responsible for 40% of global weapons sales.
Infographic: The World's Biggest Arms Exporters
This chart shows the share of global arms exports from 2019 to 2023, by country.www.statista.com
Unless you want to argue, like Poland did at the UN yesterday, that Israel is a terrorist state. Then its exactly the same, it just depends on which side you sit.Yes. I should have also drawn the distinction when I said both Iran and the US needs to stop. There is an actual difference in that one is trade and the other is covert arming of terror groups. Still, there should be limits or conditions placed so there is no escalation of hostilities.