The shoe fits, Shazi.
You choose to back apartheid and genocide.
Once you back genocide you get comparisons to nazis and pol pot.
Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah leader, killed in Beirut in Israeli strike
- Thread starter Shaquille Oatmeal
- Start date
You choose to back apartheid and genocide.
Once you back genocide you get comparisons to nazis and pol pot.
Nothing you said involves terrorist attacking Jews to stop, what kind of peace is it you want? Kill all the Jews lol
What a stupid, stupid post.
I said both sides should be held to the law and a ceasefire to happen.
How the hell do you think that means 'kill all the Jews', as you declared?
Yeah? It fits like a glove on you? Glad to hear.
(Waiting for you to change my post.)
I'll respectfully disagree with you here.
I think @Frankfooter has truly held beliefs that he is passionate about. I wouldn't say he "lies" per se but I do agree that his passion causes him to make intellectually dishonest arguments.
And I wouldn't call him a bully either. Just pushing his narrative hard. I don't like all the Shazi and other name calling that too many use in this discussion either but it cuts both ways.
One thing that he says that really bugs me is well unless you agree with me then you are supporting terrorism. Or he tries to twist what you say to support his narrative . So I tend to avoid interacting with him on this matter.
But I believe he is a positive and sincere contributor to this forum.
Every accusation is a confession, Shazi.
I have long argued that the word 'terrorism' is problematic for multiple reasons, the largest is just that its an excuse used by the US to excuse themselves from the application of international law to their own acts. For years they have declared movements to be 'terrorist' in order to justify 'interventions' into other countries, which are of themselves war crimes. Hollywood for years featured movies where 'terrorists' were always depicted as Muslims and we see that now where white supremacist attacks aren't labelled as 'terrorism' the way attacks by Muslims are. Seems like you either back a rules based world or a world ruled by force. And if its rules based you need a definition of terrorism based on the acts. Something like the international definition of 'targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure for political purposes'.
The issue with a definition is then discussing whether that applies to an attack that has destroyed civilian infrastructure and killed mostly civilians. At best its the war crime of disproportionate response and indiscriminate weapons like Hamas rockets, at worst does it fit the definition. And if it doesn't, why?
Really, there just needs to be a way to end the fighting and war crimes. In Palestine and in Ukraine. Regardless of what you call it.
I disagree with you, while this is not a personal attack on you, I think you're naïve. Frank got booted out so many times from Terb. He's a passionate for Islamic terrorist supporter driven by religion. When Syria killed almost 500 thousand of his people, his focus was on Israel. When Iran butchered a bunch of their own people during the revolt, his focus is on Israele. I can name many countries. Somehow you're enchanted by Frank , its so strange.
I somewhat admire Frank for continuing the Sisyphusian work of arguing with the Terzionists here.
The "arguments" are always the same:
Israel bombed an orphanage.
You support terrorists
Israel killed 5000 civilians in Lebanon.
You love terrorists
Israel has killed 1000 health care workers in Gaza.
You are a friend of terrorists.
Continue ad infinitum
Last edited:
You admire him because you hate the Jews too. You always did Dan, or should it be Klatuu?
Infantile response.
Israel is accused of genocide.
You hate Jews
Israel is bombing refuge camps
You hate Jews
Israel bombs hospitals
You hate Jews.
Continue ad infinitum.
Last edited:
Sisyphean, Danny. Not "sisiphusian".
I should accuse you of syntactical terrorism - and total lack of logic.
