My point, that I provided info to back up, is that there are more leftwing biased MSM outlets than right wing.All media outlets have biases, but that doesn't mean they are unfair or misconstrue facts. You will see the MSM write negative stories about the left in a way that right-wing media never would about their side. Right-wing media will try to spin horrible things or downplay stuff (or not cover it at all) if, say, Trump does something stupid or illegal or borderline illegal. That's the massive difference. The MSM attempts to get both sides of the story to be balanced, yet you rarely see that on the right.
As for fact checkers: Who gives a flying fuck? I mean, they are providing factual information, and while that can be spun, it is hard to argue with them when they bring receipts. In that, are you implying that they only fact check people like Trump and Vance, and not Harris or Walz? Because they do. They may not have as much material as those who check Trump and Vance, but they do check the Dems as well.
So that means they have a greater share of influence.
If you have 75% of people peddling a biased narrative compared to 25% for example, that has more impact and sway.