Select Company Escorts

Vance/Walz debate!!

Previous Thread Next Thread
S

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,501
3,639
113
silentkisser said:
Um....The protests in Tiananmen Square started in April and lasted until June 4th. I don't think Walz said he was there for the entire time of the protest....So, this isn't exactly a smoking gun of him lying about being there...

Also, just because a photo was published on a certain date, doesn't mean it was taken on that day....

Finally, coming from the right, where the presidential candidate lies about virtually everything and anything makes me remember the old idiom...those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw any rocks...
Click to expand...
Not quite...
...so both sides lie is the message here.




On Tuesday, CNN posted a 2019 radio interview in which Walz stated he was in Hong Kong on the day of the massacre, when publicly available evidence suggests he was not.

After a seven-week demonstration in Beijing led by pro-democracy students, China’s military fired heavily on the group on June 4, 1989, and left at least 500 people dead.


Minnesota Public Radio reported Monday that publicly available accounts contradict a 2014 statement made by Walz, then a member of the U.S. House, during a hearing that commemorated the 25th anniversary of the massacre. Walz suggested that he was in the then-British colony of Hong Kong in May 1989, but he appears to have been in Nebraska. Public records suggest he left for Hong Kong and China in August of that year.

https://apnews.com/article/walz-china-tiananmen-square-protests-8d433bf7184e8c430aa31d1f5460fe87
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
S

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,501
3,639
113
silentkisser said:
So....are you saying the GOP lie all the time, regardless if they have a good reason? Like saying they won elections when they didn't?
Click to expand...
When one side makes a career of accusing the other of lying then gets caught lying as well it kinda blows their righteousness out of the water.
 
S

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,501
3,639
113
silentkisser said:
Sadly, the left wing podcasters didn't get any of that Russian disinformation money...
Click to expand...
You must have heard that on one of those conspiracy podcasts.
Besides, if you really think about it, the left wing doesn't need podcasters...they already own all the mainstream media outlets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WyattEarp
WyattEarp

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,232
2,038
113
squeezer said:
I skimmed myself to Ramsey, I didn't listen to Luke. That is the beauty of YouTube, you do not have to sit through the entire video, just the meat and potatoes. If you grab the clips of Trump being interviewed you can see Trump is a dumbass and a conman but hey, you know that, you just won't admit it.
Click to expand...
The beauty of youtube is that you can prompt it to start where you want and then post the new link.

If that doesn't do the trick, you're crazy if you think someone is going to jump around the clip looking for the relevant "meat and potatoes". I'm guessing it wasn't that enlightening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
S

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,458
14,981
113
Skoob said:
Being able to grab whatever clip in a video confirms your bias is why you think Youtube is a really trustworthy source? Do you think you're CNN or something?
Click to expand...
Dude, if you see your cult leader speaking, what is their to not believe?

This is your leader, WHAT HAS YOUTUBE twisted? Listen to him and tell me he sounds like an intelligent individual. Go ahead, tell us why his word salad with nonsense dressing is articulate and well thought out.

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: mandrill and mitchell76
K

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,211
7,847
113
Room 112
Vance clearly won this debate but in the end it won't really matter. This November's election looks like a runaway Trump victory unless they 'take him out' before then.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer and mitchell76
WyattEarp

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,232
2,038
113
squeezer said:
Dude, if you see your cult leader speaking, what is their to not believe?

This is your leader, WHAT HAS YOUTUBE twisted? Listen to him and tell me he sounds like an intelligent individual. Go ahead, tell us why his word salad with nonsense dressing is articulate and well thought out.

Click to expand...
I guess I am not getting the damning part of Trump's exchange with the press here. He doesn't want to do 60 minutes because he believes they were shits for perpetuating the false narrative that Hunter's laptop was Russian misinformation.

I might be older than you. I'm sorry I might also be more politically mature than you. When a politician you don't like says something or says they believe something, that might be all there is to it.

For yourself, you might want to slow the clip down to watch and listen. (I can show you how to slow down the clip if you want.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
M

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
21,565
8,095
113
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1841598167042716056


WATCH:
@JDVance
absolutely dominated the Vice Presidential Debate last night, exposing
@Tim_Walz
’s hypocrisy on everything from inflation, immigration, to free speech! Despite all of the media’s lies, Vance showed his true character—empathetic, vice presidential, and sharp on the issues. Walz, on the other hand, dodged tough questions on abortion and China, and fumbled when asked to defend the policies of the Biden-Harris regime. The media was biased as always, “fact checking” JD Vance 8 times more than Tim Walz, but even they couldn’t protect Walz from his weak performance and love for school shooters. Vance’s composure and command of the facts made him the clear winner of the debate. Vote wisely this November!
 
WyattEarp

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,232
2,038
113
K Douglas said:
Vance clearly won this debate but in the end it won't really matter. This November's election looks like a runaway Trump victory unless they 'take him out' before then.
Click to expand...
The more I read the post-debate analysis I have started to think Vance won the debate. This is merely because he was demonized and turned into a caricature by the Liberal media. He's not weird. He's not scary. He came off very amicable and articulate.

I think Walz did a good job, but Vance had more upside from a good debate performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xmontrealer and mitchell76
S

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,458
14,981
113
WyattEarp said:
I guess I am not getting the damning part of Trump's exchange with the press here. He doesn't want to do 60 minutes because he believes they were shits for perpetuating the false narrative that Hunter's laptop was Russian misinformation.

I might be older than you. I'm sorry I might be more politically mature than you. When a politician you don't like says something or they believe something, that might be all there is to it.

For yourself, you might want to slow the clip down to watch and listen. (I can show you how if you want.)
Click to expand...
I didn't think reading comprehension was an issue with you but perhaps I've been giving you too much credit.

squeezer said:
Dude, if you see your cult leader speaking, what is their to not believe?

This is your leader, WHAT HAS YOUTUBE twisted? Listen to him and tell me he sounds like an intelligent individual. Go ahead, tell us why his word salad with nonsense dressing is articulate and well thought out.

Click to expand...
Read my post again and pay attention to the bolded words. Where in the post did I criticize Trump for not wanting to do the interview?

Now that you bring it up, yes he's a coward.

You must be older and I know with age the mind starts to wander a tad.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76
You must log in or register to reply here.
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom