Tater Bros. cars seized.

[Ceiling Cat]

A mountain of money wasn’t enough. They would never be embraced by the worlds of TV, movies, or sports stars, nor would they find acceptance among the elite of old or new money. Even the gangsters kept their distance, never publicly associating with them. John Gotti's attempt to create a society of mobster chic had failed, and the Tate Bros. aimed to establish a culture where they would be revered. They portrayed a realm where they could indulge in any desire, acquire anything they wished, and bribe any Romanian official. Clearly, they were mistaken. Even without their current and past criminal charges, would any country allow them entry?
They had made Romania their prison even before they were charged with crimes and put into a real prison

 

[mandrill]

 

[mandrill]

Ok, so why do you suppose they were both released this second time with a 'mountain' of evidence against them?

For the same reason anyone else gets bail. You don't comprehend what I write. So we'll try again before I put you back on "ignore".

Bail doesn't depend on probability of conviction. It depends on whether the court thinks you will reliably show up at your trial or not. If there is a reasonable guarantee that you will show up - i.e. steady job, roots in the community, large bail bond or cash deposit, confiscation of passport and daily reporting, etc - you get bail.

Bail also depends on whether the court thinks you will re offend while on bail. If you're a good guy or - more likely with the Taters - the cops have all your electronics and phones, so you can't do shit, you will get bail.

You pretzel so much trying to pretend that the Taters are innocent that you just make yourself look silly. If you are trying to imply that the Taters get bail because there is no evidence against them, then the "corrupt" Romanian cops have fucked up in their mission of railroading the Tates. And the judge would dismiss the charges.

But the prosecution continues. So that means there is considerable evidence against the Tates. So why would they get bail, if bail depends on likelihood on acquittal??

You see, you've argued yourself into a circle already.

 

[mandrill]

They go against the grain and say things that go against most peoples belief system. Not to mention they are rich, successful and have a huge audience which most people envy. If you can get past their mysoginism (which I can) they actually make a lot of great points about the system and the way the world has deteriorated from a moral perspective. Maybe take a few minutes the hear what they say, then form your own opinion of them. Kudos to you for not just jumping on the hate train like most people do.

They discuss pimping, manipulating and controlling girls. Like pimps do. That's because they're pimps.

If they just said dumb, pseudo Christian, self important shit like Peterson or anti semitic conspiracy theory shit like Candace Owens, they would be nasty af, but no one would try and put them in jail.

Why would the Romanian cops gaf that the Tates are "outspoken nonconformists"?!

You think the Romanian cops go around making huge, time consuming fake investigations of people just because those people are unlikable assholes with big mouths?... It's way too much work. The Romanian cops, prosecutors and judges have spend MONTHS on this case. You think they'd do that just because they find the Tates annoying?!

The Tates are charged because there is considerable evidence that they pimp and beat teenaged girls and also launder $$$$.

Now you go back on ignore.

 

[SexB]

I'm again going to say that I just find it hilarious that a bunch of grown men are tripping over themselves to simp for someone whose main audience is teenage "incels" and would look at them with utter contempt because they see escorts.

It speaks volumes to the maturity level of a lot of this board's members.

 

[mandrill]

x.com

x.com

Andrew Tate allegedly hit this victim in the side of head while choking her so hard it ruptured the blood vessels in her eye. He also damaged her breast implant. DIICOT has photographs of some of the aftermath and follow up messages from Tate.

 

[Jenesis]

x.com

x.com

Andrew Tate allegedly hit this victim in the side of head while choking her so hard it ruptured the blood vessels in her eye. He also damaged her breast implant. DIICOT has photographs of some of the aftermath and follow up messages from Tate.

View attachment 356297

View attachment 356298

What a fucking disgusting piece of shit. It is so sad that there are some here who are hell bent on defending this guy.

 

[Leimonis]

What a fucking disgusting piece of shit. It is so sad that there are some here who are hell bent on defending this guy.

He is also pro Palestinian. Fucking freedom fighter

 

[Leimonis]

I'm curious if you're able to differentiate between a person simping for the tate brothers and someone simping for innocent until proven guilty? Because there definitely is a difference if you're able to see it.

I think what makes this difference a bit more difficult to see is that sometimes people are innocent even after they are proven guilty. Like President Donald Trump, for example.
there is simply two stages of innocence one is before proven guilty and the other is because the trial was rigged.
I fully expect the same thing thing to happen to Tait brothers

 

[Leimonis]

So you're saying Trump as well as the Tate brothers are innocent?

I expect you to say it

 

[Jenesis]

I expect you to say it

Dayum!!!!!!!!! You called him out!!!!! LMAO. That was brilliant. He literally walked right into that one.

 

[Jenesis]

Awe Jimi. That one hurt eh? Got so mad you went and laughed at 17 random posts of mine in less than 5 minutes.

Tell me that my last post stung hard without telling me…..

Guess you should have truly had me on ignore like you said.

Can’t wait for my hubby-to-be @squeezer to see this.

 

[squeezer]

Awe Jimi. That one hurt eh? Got so mad you went and laughed at 17 random posts of mine in less than 5 minutes.

Tell me that my last post stung hard without telling me…..

Guess you should have truly had me on ignore like you said.

Can’t wait for my hubby-to-be @squeezer to see this.

Oh yeah, I noticed earlier but had to rush out so couldn't respond. Ignore my ass, he doesn't have the balls to put us on ignore. His life would have no meaning without us honey.

BTW, it's your turn to take out the garbage!!!!!

 

[Jenesis]

Oh yeah, I noticed earlier but had to rush out so couldn't respond. Ignore my ass, he doesn't have the balls to put us on ignore. His life would have no meaning without us honey.

BTW, it's your turn to take out the garbage!!!!!

So true.

and yes yes. I will take out the garbage but you are walking the dogs tonight.

 

[Leimonis]

That wasn't an answer to my question. I asked you to clarify your position.

My position is that we are not judge or jury and we are entitled to come to our own conclusions based on the evidence we have heard so far. By way of example we are entitled to believe that OJ Simpson was a murderer even though he was acquitted.

with respect to these two my position is that Trump is an extremely dangerous POS and tate is a somewhat less dangerous POS

 

[squeezer]

So true.

and yes yes. I will take out the garbage but you are walking the dogs tonight.

Dammit! They shit like race horses!!! DAMMIT!!!!

Jimi, can I please borrow a couple of your masks???

 

[Jenesis]

My position is that we are not judge or jury and we are entitled to come to our own conclusions based on the evidence we have heard so far. By way of example we are entitled to believe that OJ Simpson was a murderer even though he was acquitted.

with respect to these two my position is that Trump is an extremely dangerous POS and tate is a somewhat less dangerous POS

I already used the OJ example and have already said what you just did. Maybe coming from someone other than me, he may be able to understand the difference between opinion and court of law.

 

[Jenesis]

Dammit! They shit like race horses!!! DAMMIT!!!!

Jimi, can I please borrow a couple of your masks???

Quit bitchin’. I’ll make you a sandwich without mayo.

 

[Leimonis]

I already used the OJ example and have already said what you just did. Maybe coming from someone other than me, he may be able to understand the difference between opinion and court of law.

Oh, I think they know the difference very well. An opinion on Hunter Biden laptop definitely is just as good and sufficient as his fathers hypothetical conviction in the court of law would be.

 

[Robert Mugabe]

Oh well. At least they lived in a palace for a while.