Um no, merely pointing out the mortality of the so called Dem gods you worship as divine
Kamala Harris was not a Progressive Prosecutor
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
But you hardly ever point out the insanity and depravity of Trump....therefore you are basically campaigning for that asshole, which makes you a moronic troll here on Terb.
Here is what you are saying. You Don have the ability to accept criticism of a politician. That any deviation from lavish praise is automatically to be considered "campaigning" for another one.
And really don't see how dangerous that mindset is.
Back a week or two ago, you were bragging that Elon Musk is giving Trump 45 million a month. Last quarter half of Tesla's profits were government handouts. SpaceX gets government handouts. Had he donated to the democrats you would have cried bloody murder. There is nothing progressive about you, you need to come to terms that you are a right-winger.
You are mistaking bragging with discussing. My stand on Citizens United has not changed.
She obviously is.
That said, this is one of those tactical moves you have to look carefully at.
The history of the bipartisan fetish on the side of the Dems in order to be "responsible adults" is a bad one with a shitty track record.
So what to make of this move?
First off, it isn't a promise or commitment - just an answer to the MSM who loves pushing that line.
But more importantly, it is in the context of having a bunch of GOP speakers at the convention.
That the Harris-Walz team is trying to open a path for the discontented Republicans to vote for them (or at least not vote for Trump) is pretty clear.
This is obviously part of that. A dangled promise of how it wouldn't be so bad.
Would she actually do it?
Sadly, I think it is possible.
The question would be in what capacity and how dangerous would it be to do it?
The safest option might be some kind of ex-Republican, now "independent" being given something.
I don't like any Cabinet roles going to even that kind of Republican, but maybe something like Ambassador to the UN (if they've got some diplomatic/foreign policy background, they can probably do that without too much worry since it isn't very independent) or maybe even Veteran's Affairs since there are some Republicans who actually want improvements there so there could be some common ground to work with.
But the choices would be limited.
There are only 2 candidates to choose from here. If you constantly criticize one, you are, in effect campaigning for the other. It doesn't negate that reality when once in a blue moon you say Trump is an idiot too. Now be a good troll and go dig up some more dirt on the Dems!
I really don't have to dig, they are quite adept at digging their own holes.
And part of my thought process is the corruption of the two party system. It has essentially enabled an oligarchy to take power.
