it is about straight identifying men engaging in homosexuality a book was written about this
Not Gay - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Red Pill Frauds
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
it is about straight identifying men engaging in homosexuality a book was written about this
en.wikipedia.org
the bottomless pit of red pill ideology has physical and spiritual stuff
"there is nothing new under the sun"
red pill nonsense is just the return of ancient pre-christian initiation cults and pagan religions and theologies
now you know
In The Matrix, Morpheus offering Neo the truth and asking him to choose between a blue or red pill symbolizing materialistic relativism and secret knowledge respectively, which has been compared to Gnosticism in scholarly criticism.
Flannery-Dailey, Frances, and Rachel Wagner. "Wake up! Gnosticism and Buddhism in the Matrix." Journal of Religion and Film 5.2 (2001).
"there is nothing new under the sun"
red pill nonsense is just the return of ancient pre-christian initiation cults and pagan religions and theologies
now you know
In The Matrix, Morpheus offering Neo the truth and asking him to choose between a blue or red pill symbolizing materialistic relativism and secret knowledge respectively, which has been compared to Gnosticism in scholarly criticism.
Flannery-Dailey, Frances, and Rachel Wagner. "Wake up! Gnosticism and Buddhism in the Matrix." Journal of Religion and Film 5.2 (2001).
the manosphere is not about mens rights and mens issues and "game" it is about incels hating women
red piller Connor Murphy. “You’re not a true Red-Piller until you understand that the best women are biological men”
screenshot software for windows
Chad Scientist Debunks "Men Age Like Wine" Myth
Macken Murphy had a debate with Richard Cooper about Hypergamy and within that debate they debate the issue of men aging like fine wine. Guess who won that debate?
Macken Murphy had a debate with Richard Cooper about Hypergamy and within that debate they debate the issue of men aging like fine wine. Guess who won that debate?
Bad news for the passport bros and red pillers who want to go overseas
84% of Colombia’s children are born out of wedlock, in South America more than half of children are born to single mothers.
According to the available data, only 20% of Colombians of reproductive age (18-49) are married.
If you're thinking of becoming a Passport bro, just know dating and relationships are hard no matter how you slice it. Women in Latin America & Colombia specifically still have standards you need to meet.
Colombia: World Leader in Single Mothers and Low Marriage Rates
84% of Colombia’s children are born out of wedlock, in South America more than half of children are born to single mothers.
According to the available data, only 20% of Colombians of reproductive age (18-49) are married.
If you're thinking of becoming a Passport bro, just know dating and relationships are hard no matter how you slice it. Women in Latin America & Colombia specifically still have standards you need to meet.
Colombia: World Leader in Single Mothers and Low Marriage Rates
missed all of this when i was busy with other matters
Red Pill Whiner Rollo Tomassi Exposed For Having Racist Alt Account
Red Pill Whiner Rollo Tomassi Exposed For Having Racist Alt Account
Last edited:
What the manosphere and liberal feminism share
There are probably too many definitions of the “red pill” now to enumerate. But one consistent theme among those who embrace a worldview dubbed by one progressive as “the heart of modern misogyny” is overt hostility to feminism.
If one of its most prominent advocates is anything to go by, though, the “red pill” should be seen not so much as opposed to feminism as structurally identical to it — just with the poles reversed.
Rollo Tomassi, the “Rational Male”, is a famous (or, if you prefer, notorious) figure in the online manosphere. His prolific output promises, for the young men who pay to access his teaching, to reveal the secrets of “Game”, which is to say the hidden key to manipulating women into wanting sex with you. This, he asserts, turns on becoming a “high-value male” and thus triggering women’s innate, evolved tendency to desire high-status men.
But what does such a high-value male look like? Tomassi this week tweeted his cheat sheet for attaining this elusive status. Avoid early marriage; work hard at staying in shape; focus on your career goals; earn lots of money. And, most startlingly of all: neuter yourself in your twenties.
A high-value male, then, is a rich, workaholic, commitment-phobic gym-rat who can’t give you kids. I suppose there must be some women for whom this is an appealing picture, but what struck me about Tomassi’s guidelines are just how startling a resemblance they bear, with superficial adjustments in aesthetic, to this wildly successful classic of liberal pop-feminism, which sold two million copies in its first two weeks: Helen Gurley Brown’s 1962 Sex and the Single Girl.
The book advises women to keep themselves in shape, focus on their careers and social lives, and have as many sexual affairs as they like — especially with married men — until they’re ready (if they ever are) to settle down. At that point, Brown points to her own story to reassure women that they’re sure to find a great man who will admire their success and ambition.
The principal difference between Tomassi’s and Brown’s visions is that Brown promises her readers, with the aid of glowing anecdata, that you can have the singledom, the career, and all the sex and then get married in your late thirties – at which point you’ll still be able to have all the babies you want, and to hire someone else to take care of them. She was obliged in the end to omit the chapter on birth control; but the Pill, approved by the FDA two years before Sex and the Single Girl was published, is implicit everywhere. How else is anyone to take seriously a book that celebrates female unmarried promiscuity, while mentioning pregnancy only once?
For Tomassi, meanwhile, even Brown’s optional, high-end, staff-assisted version of professional coupledom is too tied down. “High value” in his vision means foreclosing stable relationships and parental obligation altogether. Later generations of women following in Brown’s footsteps are already there, too: we need only glance at her intellectual descendants, such as the liberal feminist writer Jill Filipovic, to see paeans of praise to those women who take the Tomassi approach.
But the central takeaway for me is a simple one: that if Tomassi is anything to go by, the “redpill” manosphere worldview is anything but antagonistic to liberal feminism. Both worldviews advocate broadly the same thing, just in pink or blue flavour: an idealised vision of money-grubbing atomisation, in which sexuality is redirected from generation to leisure activity, and life has no broader purpose beyond the optimisation and gratification of self.
Rather than wasting energy taking the side of either liberal feminism or of the “red pill”, we might ask ourselves about the prospects of survival for a culture that grants any credence at all to such literally sterile ideologies.
Mary Harrington is a contributing editor at UnHerd.
What the manosphere and liberal feminism share - UnHerd
There are probably too many definitions of the “red pill” now to enumerate. But one consistent theme among those who embrace a worldview dubbed by one progressive as “the heart of modern misogyny” is overt hostility to feminism.
If one of its most prominent advocates is anything to go by, though, the “red pill” should be seen not so much as opposed to feminism as structurally identical to it — just with the poles reversed.
Rollo Tomassi, the “Rational Male”, is a famous (or, if you prefer, notorious) figure in the online manosphere. His prolific output promises, for the young men who pay to access his teaching, to reveal the secrets of “Game”, which is to say the hidden key to manipulating women into wanting sex with you. This, he asserts, turns on becoming a “high-value male” and thus triggering women’s innate, evolved tendency to desire high-status men.
But what does such a high-value male look like? Tomassi this week tweeted his cheat sheet for attaining this elusive status. Avoid early marriage; work hard at staying in shape; focus on your career goals; earn lots of money. And, most startlingly of all: neuter yourself in your twenties.
A high-value male, then, is a rich, workaholic, commitment-phobic gym-rat who can’t give you kids. I suppose there must be some women for whom this is an appealing picture, but what struck me about Tomassi’s guidelines are just how startling a resemblance they bear, with superficial adjustments in aesthetic, to this wildly successful classic of liberal pop-feminism, which sold two million copies in its first two weeks: Helen Gurley Brown’s 1962 Sex and the Single Girl.
The book advises women to keep themselves in shape, focus on their careers and social lives, and have as many sexual affairs as they like — especially with married men — until they’re ready (if they ever are) to settle down. At that point, Brown points to her own story to reassure women that they’re sure to find a great man who will admire their success and ambition.
The principal difference between Tomassi’s and Brown’s visions is that Brown promises her readers, with the aid of glowing anecdata, that you can have the singledom, the career, and all the sex and then get married in your late thirties – at which point you’ll still be able to have all the babies you want, and to hire someone else to take care of them. She was obliged in the end to omit the chapter on birth control; but the Pill, approved by the FDA two years before Sex and the Single Girl was published, is implicit everywhere. How else is anyone to take seriously a book that celebrates female unmarried promiscuity, while mentioning pregnancy only once?
For Tomassi, meanwhile, even Brown’s optional, high-end, staff-assisted version of professional coupledom is too tied down. “High value” in his vision means foreclosing stable relationships and parental obligation altogether. Later generations of women following in Brown’s footsteps are already there, too: we need only glance at her intellectual descendants, such as the liberal feminist writer Jill Filipovic, to see paeans of praise to those women who take the Tomassi approach.
But the central takeaway for me is a simple one: that if Tomassi is anything to go by, the “redpill” manosphere worldview is anything but antagonistic to liberal feminism. Both worldviews advocate broadly the same thing, just in pink or blue flavour: an idealised vision of money-grubbing atomisation, in which sexuality is redirected from generation to leisure activity, and life has no broader purpose beyond the optimisation and gratification of self.
Rather than wasting energy taking the side of either liberal feminism or of the “red pill”, we might ask ourselves about the prospects of survival for a culture that grants any credence at all to such literally sterile ideologies.
Mary Harrington is a contributing editor at UnHerd.
What the manosphere and liberal feminism share - UnHerd
more bad news for the red pill crybabies
Women already head more than half of Brazilian households
The growth of female-headed households, especially those without a spouse, has accelerated in the last decade, driven by women’s increased participation in the labor market and their financial autonomy. During this period, the number of households headed by single mothers has skyrocketed and explains a good part of the current scenario, according to a study by the Brazilian Institute of Economics of Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV Ibre).
The figures, compiled by economist Janaína Feijó based on data from the Continuous National Household Sample Survey (PnadC), show that, along with the increase in the number of households in the last decade, the number of female-headed households (those in which women have the highest remuneration) increased by 72.9% between 2012 and 2022, to 38.3 million from 22.2 million.
The participation of women among those responsible for the household increased to 50.9% from 35.7%, while that of men decreased to 49.1% from 64.3%.
The PnadC data show that the participation of households headed by married men with children decreased to 22.7% from 40.2% in the last decade, due to the increase in the participation of households headed by married women with children (to 17.1% from 8.8%) and married women without children (to 7.2% from 3%).
Households in which the reference person does not have a spouse but does have children increased to 13 million in the last quarter of 2022 from 10.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. The increase in single mothers (who live alone with their children and are the breadwinners) accounts for 82.3% of the growth.
According to Ms. Feijó, this phenomenon is explained by social and economic changes. “The greater integration of women in the labor market has made it possible to increase household income, giving many women autonomy and financial independence,” said the economist. “The rise of women as reference people is also linked to changes in social norms and the fight against gender stereotypes.”
She argues that these arrangements were already characteristic of developed countries, but less noticeable here. What has happened, Ms. Feijó said, is a process of greater equality in the proportion of men and women who are considered heads of households.
“This also has to do with the postponement of motherhood. Women are taking a leading role in the family, they are joining the market, many decide to postpone motherhood, which allows them to stay in the market, occupy more strategic positions in companies, and earn more,” she said.
This partly explains why the number of households headed by single mothers has more than quadrupled in relation to the total number of households headed by single fathers. While households headed by mothers who live only with their children increased by 1.7 million –to 11.25 million in 2022 from 9.55 million in 2012 –, those headed by single fathers increased by 370,000 – to 1.76 million in 2022 from 1.39 million in 2012 –, according to the survey.
Women already head more than half of Brazilian households | Economy | valorinternational (globo.com)
Women already head more than half of Brazilian households
The growth of female-headed households, especially those without a spouse, has accelerated in the last decade, driven by women’s increased participation in the labor market and their financial autonomy. During this period, the number of households headed by single mothers has skyrocketed and explains a good part of the current scenario, according to a study by the Brazilian Institute of Economics of Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV Ibre).
The figures, compiled by economist Janaína Feijó based on data from the Continuous National Household Sample Survey (PnadC), show that, along with the increase in the number of households in the last decade, the number of female-headed households (those in which women have the highest remuneration) increased by 72.9% between 2012 and 2022, to 38.3 million from 22.2 million.
The participation of women among those responsible for the household increased to 50.9% from 35.7%, while that of men decreased to 49.1% from 64.3%.
The PnadC data show that the participation of households headed by married men with children decreased to 22.7% from 40.2% in the last decade, due to the increase in the participation of households headed by married women with children (to 17.1% from 8.8%) and married women without children (to 7.2% from 3%).
Households in which the reference person does not have a spouse but does have children increased to 13 million in the last quarter of 2022 from 10.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. The increase in single mothers (who live alone with their children and are the breadwinners) accounts for 82.3% of the growth.
According to Ms. Feijó, this phenomenon is explained by social and economic changes. “The greater integration of women in the labor market has made it possible to increase household income, giving many women autonomy and financial independence,” said the economist. “The rise of women as reference people is also linked to changes in social norms and the fight against gender stereotypes.”
She argues that these arrangements were already characteristic of developed countries, but less noticeable here. What has happened, Ms. Feijó said, is a process of greater equality in the proportion of men and women who are considered heads of households.
“This also has to do with the postponement of motherhood. Women are taking a leading role in the family, they are joining the market, many decide to postpone motherhood, which allows them to stay in the market, occupy more strategic positions in companies, and earn more,” she said.
This partly explains why the number of households headed by single mothers has more than quadrupled in relation to the total number of households headed by single fathers. While households headed by mothers who live only with their children increased by 1.7 million –to 11.25 million in 2022 from 9.55 million in 2012 –, those headed by single fathers increased by 370,000 – to 1.76 million in 2022 from 1.39 million in 2012 –, according to the survey.
Women already head more than half of Brazilian households | Economy | valorinternational (globo.com)
