When did I ever defend him ?So if he is a bad as Trump why are you defending him?
When did I ever defend him ?So if he is a bad as Trump why are you defending him?
Ones you will be providing?
Every time to deflect to Trump. Why not just let things stand?When did I ever defend him ?
From your article.Loading…
www.reuters.com
Even here protected by given "administrative" as opposed to dishonorable for testing positive for cocaine use.
So... not protected in any way.Contrary to Trump’s claim, Hunter Biden’s discharge was administrative, which is standard procedure for failed drug tests, rather than dishonorable
From your article.
So... not protected in any way.
Good to know.
Thanks for clearing that up.
That is an ad by a law firm, but sure.What Will a Drug Charge Do to Your Military Career?
A drug charge is a serious offense in the military. You will likely face the termination of your career, felony conviction & incarceration.www.jordanucmjlaw.com
Reuters added an opinion. Here is a legal reps sysopsis.
Let's see what the ad says.Including the fact felony charges can be on the table.
Yup.
- Bad Conduct discharge: Drug use is often labeled as “serious misconduct.” This can lead to military discharge, including a Bad Conduct or in extreme cases a dishonorable discharge. In addition, being discharged for a drug offense renders you ineligible for reenlistment in any branch of the Armed Forces.
So perfectly normal for it not to have become a felony charge according to this.
- Jail time: A guilty verdict in a civilian court could result in extended incarceration. The best way to defend against this consequence is to have the charge heard in a military trial. However, even if your case goes to a court martial, a guilty verdict here could escalate the case to a civilian court, where an imprisonment sentence is possible.
Who did he take a plea deal with?He took a plea deal, probably arranged by daddy.
"A guilty verdict in civilian court can lead to extended incarceration"That is an ad by a law firm, but sure.
Let's see what the ad says.
Yup.
Agreeing with what your other article said.
It is only a dishonourable discharge in extreme cases.
So nothing out of the ordinary here.
So perfectly normal for it not to have become a felony charge according to this.
Who did he take a plea deal with?
Where is this deal recorded?
And why would the perfectly normal act of a plea deal (which is what happens in most cases in the American legal system) require special arrangement by daddy?
Seriously, Butler, you need to stop being so invested in your Narrative and mistaking it for real life.
By the way using drugs is not a crime in Canada and many other jurisdictions. Possessing is. So returning a car with a crack pipe (which presumably wouldn’t have enough drug to be analyzed ) is not a crime at all."A guilty verdict in civilian court can lead to extended incarceration"
Hmmmm.....who is responsible for that?! And locking up lots of poor ghetto kids? I guess the scions of Senators who get the opportunity to join the navy are exempt from his father's contempt.
Several times let off....
All Drug Offenders Should Be Treated Like Hunter Biden: Leniently
If Hunter Biden, the son of leading Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, used his father's connections to get rich without working that hard, hereason.com
Dating back to being 18, a waiver to get in the Navy, other times drugs found but no charges brought.
All because of his name. How many black kids get the same treatment?
Which isn't the normal outcome of drugs in the military."A guilty verdict in civilian court can lead to extended incarceration"
He got breaks because rich and connected, absolutely. (Although getting waivered in for prior drug issues isn't that uncommon, from what I understand.)All Drug Offenders Should Be Treated Like Hunter Biden: Leniently
If Hunter Biden, the son of leading Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, used his father's connections to get rich without working that hard, hereason.com
Dating back to being 18, a waiver to get in the Navy, other times drugs found but no charges brought.
All because of his name. How many black kids get the same treatment?
See, he is rich, with an influential father, and therefore got special treatment. You finally admitted it.Which isn't the normal outcome of drugs in the military.
The military handles its own things.
And the normal result is an administrative discharge.
Which is what happened here.
I know this makes you angry, but reality is reality.
He got breaks because rich and connected, absolutely. (Although getting waivered in for prior drug issues isn't that uncommon, from what I understand.)
That isn't what you claimed though.
You claimed influence on the discharge, which I showed you was you being full of shit.
There are possession of drug periphanalia charges available as well in many jurisdictions.By the way using drugs is not a crime in Canada and many other jurisdictions. Possessing is. So returning a car with a crack pipe (which presumably wouldn’t have enough drug to be analyzed ) is not a crime at all.
I never denied he got advantages, welcome to the real world.See, he is rich, with an influential father, and therefore got special treatment. You finally admitted it.
LOLNot so hard. Now though the curtain is down. We see the man behind it.
LOCK THEM UPNot Hunter not Trump are going to jail...so what the hey?
Nothing imagined. Simple case of Nepobaby getting his cumupance. After years of getting away with shit.I never denied he got advantages, welcome to the real world.
I denied your fantasies about what happened that run through your fevered brain.
Again, for the umpteenth time -- "I, Butler, have imagined this happened, therefore it must be true" isn't the standard of proof to the rest of us that you want it to be.
LOL
For example, saying shit like this.
Which article is that?And more importantly the man who created the legislation(including the article shows HE WAS IN FACT A PART OF THE GUN LAWS HE IS CHARGED UNDER)
The one you quoted in post 229. It's right there in black and white.Which article is that?
Oh.The one you quoted in post 229. It's right there in black and white.
If you are going to critique a source, reading it, and comprehending it is pretty much a requirement.
Dude. You posted it. Own it. It's right there in the article.Oh.
You believe the Washington Examiner without looking into things.
Do you think the law banning drug users from possessing guns is from 1989?
I guess its nice of you to admit you will be gaslighting in that thread.Now off you go to the Biden dementia pages. You have a shit ton of gaslighting ahead if you there.