larue, I can explain it again but you're not smart enough to understand.
this will be entertaining, however not scientific
Water vapour levels change with the amount of heat in the atmosphere - more heat = more water vapour the atmosphere can hold.
Water vapour is feedback effect, it reacts to more heat.
there is no reaction
no chemical bonds are formed or broken
water / water vapour are natures universal temperature moderators
Put more water vapour in the atmosphere and it will hit a saturation point and become rain, leaving the atmosphere.
convection / condensation energy transfers are orders of magnitude greater than any incremental radiative energy transfer.
you are very confused by scale
Put more CO2 in the atmosphere and it works like a blanket trapping heat.
a blanket @ 400 parts per million ?
now that is a a very loose and ineffective weave
you are very confused about scale
CO2 is a feedback effect.
????
you previously defined CO2 as a forcing molecule and defined water vapor as a feedback only molecule
now you have this ass backward
you are a clueless clown
Adding more heat to the atmosphere won't increase CO2 levels, unlike water vapour.
adding heat to the oceans will increase CO2 release into the atmosphere from the ocean ( recall it is a
global warming theory)
CO2 solubility in water is inversely proportional to temperature
the natural cycle of CO2 is 50 X what man produces
Do I need to link to the Ontario science program, NASA and the IPCC yet again?
no you need to enroll in
https://www.ilc.org/pages/what-we-offer-ossd
Earn a High School Diploma and Change Your Life
Will you ever figure out the difference?
determining the difference between a person who has scientific training vs. a pathological lair who dropped out of high school is not that challenging
5. Why Was Water Vapor Excluded from Consideration in the Climate Change-CO2 Hypothesis?
The IPCC excludes water vapor and clouds for reasons other than science.
The statement by the IPCC on page xv of the Executive Summary identifies the purpose of excluding water vapor [3]. “Two important greenhouse gases, water vapour, and ozone, are not included in this table. Water vapour has the largest greenhouse effect, but its concentration in the troposphere is determined internally within the climate system, and, on a global scale, is not affected by human sources and sinks.” Emphasis added. “It was agreed at the first meeting of the IPCC that a new assessment of the whole issue of anthropogenic climate change should be prepared.” [23] Emphasis added.
They excluded Ozone from consideration for a different reason. The IPCC [3] stated at page xv of the Executive Summary that reason to be: “The concentration of ozone is changing both in the stratosphere and the troposphere due to human activities, but it is difficult to quantify the changes from present observations.” Hence, ozone was excluded because it was too difficult to quantify.
exclude the largest contributor to the greenhouse effect (water vapor) because it does not fit their false narrative ?????
exclude clouds because they can not model cloud formation ???????
exclude ozone because it was too difficult to quantify ?????
yet they claim this is settled science
pseudoscience .........pure and simple
and frankfooter will never be able to figure this out..................
- because he dropped out of high school
- because he does not want to figure it out
![{\displaystyle h=145366.45\left[1-\left({\frac {\text{Station pressure in millibars}}{1013.25}}\right)^{0.190284}\right].}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a6cc0a7688744c8ca9519a447051658b9a130ee1)
