Why has not single case of these allegations been brought to criminal court?
You still won't answer. Lol!
Leticia James is a loser!!
- Thread starter mitchell76
- Start date
You still won't answer. Lol!
You have used a confirmed homophobe post to back up your arguments and are now back-peddling.
You fell on your face homophobe. Everything you are responding with at this point is to distract from your true colours:
Why do you hate the LGTBQ+ community?
You've used a confirmed rapist and an incel to back up your arguments.
This means using the way you think you know this means you think you are a rapist and an incel.
And yet you continue this line of discussion knowing what it says about you?
You should have just stuck to this line of argument.
It still makes rump guilty of sexual assault, which people generally refer to as rape.
That's the law.
Don't like it?
Do something to change it.
Otherwise, accept it and move on.
You asked the reason.
I gave it.
That you want to make up another, hidden, sinister reason is your own BS to sell.
He wasn't tried in criminal court because the statute of limitations didn't allow it.
That's all you actually know.
He's saying a few things.
One is that it isn't rape if it is the right kind of person doing it to the right kind of target.
Second is that - at least for the purposes of this discussion - the only definition that matters is criminal law and guilty verdicts in criminal court specifically using the language of the law.
In other words, he is pretending to be the kind of person who believes that no one has committed rape in Canada since 1983, since no one has been found guilty in criminal court of rape in Canada since then.
How about all the other cases? All of them fall under the statute? Magically years later people come out of the woodwork?
Don't be naive.
We all know this was a total con job and politically motivated. If it was anyone other than someone you didn't already dislike you would say the same thing.
Confirmation bias and the Dems have been totally behind the ongoing campaign for a decade.
Everyone knows this.
I can't speak about all rape cases, but I can speak about this one. It was a sham and politically motivated.
No legitimate rape victim gloats about going shopping with the awarded money like she did. You are being played.
Even if the case went Trump's way, you would still be condemning him so let's not pretend this is anything but confirmation bias.
Why, he did exactly what bragged about doing?
Why didn't you believe him when he bragged about being able to rape women and get away with it?
In the video, Trump tells Bush about a failed attempt to seduce Nancy O'Dell, who was Bush's co-host at the time (circa 2005) of the recording:[16]
Later, referring to Arianne Zucker (whom they were waiting to meet), Trump says:
Just for the sake of being precise, that will no longer be the case starting September 1.
I thought this was quite clear.
For many people this is one of the major things that makes him a hero and someone to support.
All the other cases of what?
Assault?
Are you convinced there are other cases of assault he should be prosecuted for that he has gotten away with?
No. We don't.
Even more so, since he was found liable in a court of law, as a society -- according to your previous reasoning -- the only thing we do know is that it wasn't a con job.
Or are you now abandoning your position that reality is dictated entirely by court rulings?
Your delusions are your problems, not mine.
Putting "Everyone knows this" after the confirmation bias accusation is chef's kiss.
You think Trump assaulted her for political reasons?
Even I don't think so and I dislike the guy.
Familiar with lots of rape victims are you?
Disturbing.
I'd be condemning him for all kinds of things, yes.
There's a lot to dislike about him besides his admitted propensity for assault.
Did the Dems teach or conspire to have Donald "grab 'em by the pussy" before he was even a presidential candidate. Even before the joke of him being a presidential candidate even came to Donald's mind?
Did the Dems and lefties ensure he bought beauty pageants so he could inspect the young girls in the change rooms?
Or did "the Dems" make his daughter so attractive and sexy that Donald said he'd probably be dating her if she wasn't his daughter?
You guys are pretty sick to stand up for and defend any cretin that even says things like that. Unless you're like him and wanna fuck your own daughter too....
You mean no stereotypical weak, powerless rape victim?
Imagine you got groped by your boss, priest, a cop or your uncle and they shoved their dirty fingers up your ass. Then called you a liar over and over when you finally got strong enough or had enough support to fight back against being called a liar.
Fuckig right any normal person would do something audacious to "shove it up HIS ass" when they finally proved him to be the rapist and liar. I'll tell you from experience, it is GREAT to have FUCK YOU money!
If I were her, at her age, I;'d find a way to buy something Trump really values, like Trump Tower, and rename it Chump Tower. Or buy something he really hates and name it for him. Like buy a a house in Palm Beach as close to Mar a Lardo as possible and name it the "Donald Trump Shithole Country Refugee Center" .
Well if "guy talk" is your measure then most people should be in jail right?
Yeah sure....what was she doing with him alone in a dept store change room? Talking politics?
OMFG you have been played.
I can only speak about the ongoing campaign of allegations and lawsuits brought forward since the day he decided to run for office. If you're curious, Google is your friend.
If you can't (or won't) see that these are politically motivated then I can't help you.
btw what flavour of kool-aide did the Dems offer you during your indoctrination classes?
