Yeah and Jesus was Palestinian
![Face with tears of joy :joy: 😂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f602.png)
Yeah and Jesus was Palestinian
Zionists would have killed him regardless.Yeah and Jesus was Palestinian![]()
Zionists would have killed him regardless.
That stable would have made a great condo.
Or as you like to call them:'Savages', 'barbarians', 'cockroaches', 'terrorists'.....
............slaughtering lesser humans............
Another intentional misquote.Or as you like to call them:
Very easily?How can they give them greater reign than Biden?
Because he did a lot of damage in the first 4 years, has changed the makeup of the people he is bringing in, has announced that he intends to do so and is gathering the resources to do so, and no longer feels he needs the support of people who are more ambivalent about the goal than last time.You are inferring that he's going to be much more dangerous than his previous 4 years but haven't explained how or why that will happen.
Why will another 4 years this time bring about the end of democracy?
You literally said, "In your view genocide is happening to people whose understanding of politics is 'incredibly shallow'," and we are talking about American voters.That's a bizarre interpretation of what I said, I didn't infer Americans were experiencing genocide at all, only that your comment made it sound like you think the people who don't support your views are inferior.
No, you don't represent them.Yet I represent those 80% of Biden supporters whose understanding is 'incredibly shallow' in your own view.
Because they aren't.You don't seem to think that your views might be either shallow, uninformed or just out of touch here.
Yes.Politics are very personal, we all build our own models of the world in our mind and those models include how you think politics work and how you think you need to work through them.
It's a good thing I don't work from a model that says that, then, isn't it?If you work from a model that says your understanding is superior to all of MAGA and 80% of dems that looks to others as more of a comment on your views of your own abilities than an objective view of politics and the situation.
Yes.Your willingness to support genocide does not make you look 'incredibly deep' to me, it just says you have no moral limits to what you will support than any MAGA supporter. It says to me that you'll back corruption/evil in some form to retain power, which is the exact criticism you use on MAGA.
What, with nukes?Very easily?
The US survived 4 years of rump once. Rump is fully senile right now and has removed all competent people around him.Because he did a lot of damage in the first 4 years, has changed the makeup of the people he is bringing in, has announced that he intends to do so and is gathering the resources to do so, and no longer feels he needs the support of people who are more ambivalent about the goal than last time.
Are you not even paying attention to the election?
Do you read history?
Check the thread, you brought up the argument that people who refused to vote for Biden had 'incredibly shallow' understanding of politics.You literally said, "In your view genocide is happening to people whose understanding of politics is 'incredibly shallow'," and we are talking about American voters.
How else do you want me to interpret it?
80% of dems supported a ceasefire for the last 5 months, as far as I know those numbers haven't moved much if at all.No, you don't represent them.
You have very specific views about politics and how they work.
That 80% you claim to "represent" don't all agree on the whole rest of the package here.
That's not how politics work and the fact you think it does is exactly what I'm talking about.
Three answers towards claiming that your model of the world is superior to those of the 80% of dems who support ceasefire.Because they aren't.
Yes.
And some of those models are very wrong.
Just objectively wrong about what actually happens.
It's a good thing I don't work from a model that says that, then, isn't it?
That's a MAGA like answer.Yes.
I know you don't understand.
It's very clear and I'm not going to waste time educating you.
Didn't you post Kushner saying how Gaza would be good to build on and lovely property - all you have to do is drop all the people living there into the desert?What, with nukes?
Considering the protests through the US and world for this level of support of genocide, how much further do you really think rump could go?
Gaza is already a death camp.
Exactly.The US survived 4 years of rump once. Rump is fully senile right now and has removed all competent people around him.
I'm not trying to convince you that Biden's handling of the Gaza situation hasn't been bad both morally and for his election chances.Biden will most likely lose the election through his personal choice to go against the will of his own party and become Genocide Joe.
You know it, I know it and trying to convince me to change my mind and won't make me suddenly become american so I can vote for Biden.
Yes.Check the thread, you brought up the argument that people who refused to vote for Biden had 'incredibly shallow' understanding of politics.
It's pragmatic to vote for Biden to keep Trump out of office.I did say 'real' ceasefire but you said 'incredibly shallow' along with arguing that its 'pragmatic' to support genocide to keep rump out of office.
Yes, but you yourself have said you are against a ceasefire if it isn't a "real" ceasefire.80% of dems supported a ceasefire for the last 5 months, as far as I know those numbers haven't moved much if at all.
No.Three answers towards claiming that your model of the world is superior to those of the 80% of dems who support ceasefire.
As I said, your views ring of ivory tower superiority. You've read the books and papers so therefore can't be wrong.
LOL!That's a MAGA like answer.
Well that's adorably incoherent.You push a model of the world where you are arguing that supporting evil for the greater good is 'pragmatic'.
The MAGA justification that all politicians are corrupt so therefore you might as well back someone corrupt if he says he's on your team is what you claim to be the Wilhoit Law, bind others, protect yourself.
But your model is pushing the Wilhoit law that its acceptable that the law doesn't protect Palestinians as long as it can then bind MAGA.
Much like Butler, that you think this is an effective attack doesn't show you in the best light.Which labels you as part of the 'corporate' or 'realistic' side of the dems, or as pushing conservative values.
No you're not.I'm just arguing that we find a way that the law binds both sides equally.
That's just a baby step. Colonists tend to be right wingers...
Were you unaware of the recent protests at a synagogue over potential land sales in the occupied territories?Didn't you post Kushner saying how Gaza would be good to build on and lovely property - all you have to do is drop all the people living there into the desert?
Yes, which is why its upsetting that Biden will have to lose the election to end genocide.Exactly.
It's incredibly fucking dangerous.
I'm trying to tell you that Never Again means Never Again.I'm not trying to convince you that Biden's handling of the Gaza situation hasn't been bad both morally and for his election chances.
I'm trying to convince you that "punishing Biden" by aiding a Trump victory accomplishes none of the goals you claim to want.
I get that you find that frustrating, but lying to yourself that it will be fine with Trump is dangerous.
And sure, it will for you probably. The direct effects on Canadians day to day won't be immediately terrible.
You think I said dems were suffering genocide?Yes.
And you said they were being subjected to genocide.
Which was fucking weird.
Your moral supremacy in defending the power 'practical' side of the dems over the progressive, vote winning side, is part of the problem of US politics.But yes, refusing to vote for Biden for those reasons means you have an incredibly shallow understanding of politics, more specifically the political structure of the US.
That you think Biden has lost support only because of the genocide shows you have a shallow understanding of the issues.It's pragmatic to vote for Biden to keep Trump out of office.
That you think this is specifically and primarily a vote in support of genocide is because you have a shallow understanding of politics.
My views aren't that radical. Stop the genocide through a ceasefire, apply international law to both sides, end apartheid and implement equal rights.Yes, but you yourself have said you are against a ceasefire if it isn't a "real" ceasefire.
And "supporting a ceasefire" is not the same as your entire political view on the situation, obviously.
D, at best. You didn't answer the question and misinterpreted the points.No.
I've dealt with actually doing politics.
LOL!
That's funny.
Well that's adorably incoherent.
Much like Butler, that you think this is an effective attack doesn't show you in the best light.
No you're not.
You're arguing that magic ponies will fix everything and you're very upset that I keep pointing out that there are no magic ponies.