"The Left Is In A REALLY Bad Place" - Ana Kasparian On The Current Political Climate

[Skoob]

We all expect you to post from MAGA bullshit which is why when you posted a list without a source you were called out on it.
Then you lied and said you posted a link when your list was clearly unsourced.

Now you're pretending you didn't say you submitted a link.

Let's try it again...do you consider the NY Times a "MAGA bullshit" source?

I claimed I posted a list...the link was in the thread posted by Squeezer immediately after my post. So the link was there for all to see. Apparently you can't follow posts to save your life.

 

[Frankfooter]

Let's try it again...do you consider the NY Times a "MAGA bullshit" source?

I claimed I posted a list...the link was in the thread posted by Squeezer immediately after my post. So the link was there for all to see. Apparently you can't follow posts to save your life.

View attachment 307713

This wasn't about the source that you eventually linked to, this is about nobody trusting you to use good sources in the first place skoob.
That's why you were called out, because you post bullshit.

On a side note, the NYT does have a bad rep for posting pro war propaganda, from Judith Miller to the bullshit Hamas rape allegations.
They aren't as trustworthy as they should be .

You posted a list without a link then claimed you posted a link and now are back to admitting you just posted a list but now can provide a link.
Total waste of bandwidth, you should have just admitted you didn't post a link with your list the first time.
That's why you aren't trusted or respected.

 

[Skoob]

This wasn't about the source that you eventually linked to, this is about nobody trusting you to use good sources in the first place skoob.
That's why you were called out, because you post bullshit.

On a side note, the NYT does have a bad rep for posting pro war propaganda, from Judith Miller to the bullshit Hamas rape allegations.
They aren't as trustworthy as they should be .

You posted a list without a link then claimed you posted a link and now are back to admitting you just posted a list but now can provide a link.
Total waste of bandwidth, you should have just admitted you didn't post a link with your list the first time.
That's why you aren't trusted or respected.

So it wasn't about the NYT source, but you went on the attack claiming I posted from a "MAGA bullshit" list? Looks like you fell on your face there...but let's carry on...

Are you striking the NYT as a source of information now? Any other mainstream sources you refuse to accept?

There was a link in the thread...why would I post that link again if it was already there?

 

[Frankfooter]

So it wasn't about the NYT source, but you went on the attack claiming I posted from a "MAGA bullshit" list? Looks like you fell on your face there...but let's carry on...

Are you striking the NYT as a source of information now? Any other mainstream sources you refuse to accept?

There was a link in the thread...why would I post that link again if it was already there?

You're lying again, skooby poo.
I didn't say you posted from a bullshit MAGA list, I said everyone assumes you post from a MAGA bullshit list which is why you were asked for a link to source where your list came from.

As a troll, you're just shitting your pants repeatedly today.

 

[HungSowel]

Lie about what exactly? I posted content from a NY Times article that's freely available. What nefarious intentions do you think I had by posting that content without a link?

NYT has copyright for their articles, did you get permission from NYT to post it on a hooker board? Also, NYT relies on ads, by stealing their content and reposting it you deny them of ad revenue.

 

[Skoob]

NYT has copyright for their articles, did you get permission from NYT to post it on a hooker board? Also, NYT relies on ads, by stealing their content and reposting it you deny them of ad revenue.

Oh wow we have a law student among us!

You are confusing copyright law with circumventing mechanisms to gain additional free articles.

Why don't you come back to us and tell us the difference once you graduate?

Hint: you may want to flip to your textbook where it discusses fair use law.

You're welcome.

 

[squeezer]

It was a very simple request: Show me a list of Biden's accomplishments.

You provided a paywalled article describing the economy not a list. Then Kautilya piggybacked onto your paywalled article because he couldn't find info on his own.
You couldn't remember what I had posted in another thread and accused me of lying.
Then he accused me of lying and was too lazy to find what I had posted and couldn't provide anything of his own. He just wanted a link to my info. You had provided a link in your response in the other thread so it was there. But Kautilya just wants everyone to do his work for him.

I let both of you go on a rant about your false accusations. Then I provided the reference to the list I had posted.

My initial response to you in this thread mentioned what I had posted...no mention of a link.

View attachment 307704

Well I have already provided the link in a previous thread so I have already demonstrated that I have the info to back up my claim and have already said I can provide it again.
I am confident of that.
Where is your info? That is my point.
Show me.

Let's try this again!

See, this is being asked again

I am asking to see the link. If you can, then please produce the link. Otherwise your claim that Trump accomplished anything is as empty as your non-existant link.

BOOM, mic drop! You lose! Unless you apologize GO AWAY!!

Squeezer produced a link that requires a subscription. Try again...and maybe don't rely on someone else to do your work (like a typical leftist).

Wait, a little more, I am having too much fun showing what a liar you are

This simple post allowed you to slither away on another nonsensical rant to deflect from your lack of actually posting a link as opposed to me posting the link for you

No I could read the link. Try a different browser. Use your brain like a leftie would.

WAIT THERE IS MORE

helpful me because I am truly a nice guy who gave you this to help you out and walk away unscathed. No firewall, just simple reading but no, you instead ran off on a tangent

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/trump-biden-presidential-records/

Here you are again, claiming you provided a link which YOU DID NOT, LIAR LIAR LIAR!!!!

I think this is funny for a couple of reasons:
1) the only link to information anyone can provide happens to be something that you need to pay for. There is lots of free info out there made free by the publishers. It's not freeloading if the publisher makes it free. They make money via ads and want visitors to their sites to access their info for free. You should learn how the internet works.
2) seeing as you are so vocal it's funny how you are relying on Squeezer to provide info and you can't. How lazy can you be?

I provided a link to Squeezer and even summarized it. You are just too incompetent to find it.

You have provided nothing in all of your responses other than asking me to prove something. Zero contribution from you but you yap louder than anyone else.

I can go on but at this point, I will give you a chance to be a man and apologize!

 

[Frankfooter]

Skoob will never apologize.
They are just a troll.

 

[Skoob]

Let's try this again!

See, this is being asked again



BOOM, mic drop! You lose! Unless you apologize GO AWAY!!



Wait, a little more, I am having too much fun showing what a liar you are

This simple post allowed you to slither away on another nonsensical rant to deflect from your lack of actually posting a link as opposed to me posting the link for you



WAIT THERE IS MORE

helpful me because I am truly a nice guy who gave you this to help you out and walk away unscathed. No firewall, just simple reading but no, you instead ran off on a tangent



Here you are again, claiming you provided a link which YOU DID NOT, LIAR LIAR LIAR!!!!



I can go on but at this point, I will give you a chance to be a man and apologize!

I think it's funny that rather than try and argue your point about Biden having more accomplishments than Trump, you are obsessed about semantics about a link.
That's what people do when they can't really argue their point...they distract.

I provided the info in that thread, and you confirmed it by then posting the link to it. Same thread, same topic.
In this thread, I first mentioned I had already posted the info.

You accused me of lying.

Then you and Kautilya started asking for a link. I provided the location as to where the info could be found that I posted. THE LINK WAS RIGHT THERE.

But you are butt hurt that I never proved an actual link that you yourself already provided? Can someone be that lazy? Lol!

That's funny...and a good try at a distraction. But it failed.

 

[squeezer]

I think it's funny that rather than try and argue your point about Biden having more accomplishments than Trump, you are obsessed about semantics about a link.

Once again you lie because I provided you a further two links which quite clearly show how Biden has far surpassed Trump in accomplishments. It is you who veered off crying about Kauti reading an article you claim he bypassed the paywall to do so. When is that apology coming??

 

[Skoob]

Once again you lie because I provided you a further two links which quite clearly show how Biden has far surpassed Trump in accomplishments. It is you who veered off crying about Kauti reading an article you claim he bypassed the paywall to do so. When is that apology coming??

No.
You and Kautilya accused me of lying way before that.
I just kept saying I had produced a list of accomplishments which I did. And I reassured you I did and I asked for you to do the same.

But the accusations started before you or him actually put in any effort to find what I posted.

 

[squeezer]

No.
You and Kautilya accused me of lying way before that.
I just kept saying I had produced a list of accomplishments which I did. And I reassured you I did and I asked for you to do the same.

But the accusations started before you or him actually put in any effort to find what I posted.

I fed you the links well before I accused you of being a liar! So once again, LIES LIES LIES! Shame on you! Show us you are a man and give us our well-deserved heartfelt apology.

 

[Frankfooter]

Once again you lie because I provided you a further two links which quite clearly show how Biden has far surpassed Trump in accomplishments. It is you who veered off crying about Kauti reading an article you claim he bypassed the paywall to do so. When is that apology coming??

Trolls never apologize.
Its just more proof that skoob is a troll.

 

[squeezer]

Trolls never apologize.
Its just more proof that skoob is a troll.

Hairy palms, yellow teeth, and a big crooked nose all in!!

 

[Skoob]

I fed you the links well before I accused you of being a liar! So once again, LIES LIES LIES! Shame on you! Show us you are a man and give us our well-deserved heartfelt apology.

Really?
You jumped on Kautilya's bandwagon right away...care to retract your accusation?

 

[Frankfooter]

Really?
You jumped on Kautilya's bandwagon right away...care to retract your accusation?

View attachment 308003

Are you going to show us your non existent link or apologize?

 

[squeezer]

Really?
You jumped on Kautilya's bandwagon right away...care to retract your accusation?

View attachment 308003

You still have not acknowledged I sent you other links that showed clearly how Biden has outperformed the diapered Don but you keep on playing the game of, deflecting, slithering, gas lighting, word salads and so on. Just be a man and say, "sorry guys".

 

[Skoob]

You still have not acknowledged I sent you other links that showed clearly how Biden has outperformed the diapered Don but you keep on playing the game of, deflecting, slithering, gas lighting, word salads and so on. Just be a man and say, "sorry guys".

Trump had 100+ accomplishments.
You source did not come close to that and a lot of it was economy based, of which Biden did not influence.

 

[Skoob]

Are you going to show us your non existent link or apologize?

I already showed it within the thread. Why would I need to share a link that was already there? Are you lazy?
You would think someone would appreciate the fact that I actually listed Trump's accomplishments from the source. Spoiled brats.

 

[squeezer]

Trump had 100+ accomplishments.
You source did not come close to that and a lot of it was economy based, of which Biden did not influence.

No he did not! Liar AGAIN!