Joe Biden ruled as too incompetent to face charges

[mandrill]

Again. Take Trump out of the equation. Do you think he is capable for the next 5 years? Just him. In his present state and only getting worse.

So, here's your problem.

1. You can't take Trump out of the equation, as Trump IS the equation.

2. If you did remove Trump, the Base would insert a Trump clone substitute like Vivek or DeSantis.

So it will necessarily be JB vs Trump / a Trump clone substitute.

 

[Anbarandy]

Again. Take Trump out of the equation. Do you think he is capable for the next 5 years? Just him. In his present state and only getting worse.

Capable to commit crimes, rape and insurrect?

Then yes, he is more than capable, he is prolifically capable, adept and well suited.

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Its a simple question. Yes, no, or I don't know. Context isn't needed. And as I said, a replacement cleans Trump's clock.

Okay…so your definition of an effective president does not include one that is committed to protecting democracy.

You have answered my question.

In answer to your question, I will support the candidate that is not a fascist.

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Earpy does perform a little, it's true. If true to form, he will avoid responding to my posts and proclaim that I am "attacking him" as the reason.

I wouldn’t bet against it. Fascist snowflakes are the biggest of all whiners, especially when getting their own sh*t served back in their faces.

One unkind post and they immediately drop to the fetal position and soil their adult diapers.

 

[WyattEarp]

I recall a time when I disagreed with something you wrote in a colourful way and you bitched, whined, and snivelled about how you prefer more thoughtful discussions like you had with @Valcazar. Thus, I find it kinda odd that you would respond with posts like this.

If things have changed and you want to take the gloves off I am more than happy to accommodate you…it would of course mean that you would need to refrain from crying and snivelling when I light you up. Unfortunately, I think we both know that you are incapable of being any other than what you are.

Have a great day.

I'm sorry. Your post was so silly. I didn't want to have to take anything away from the man you thought cured Covid and I guessed saved the world.

You should've a picked up on the humor of the cheerleader in the photo and my comment about cheerleaders preceding it.

 

[Knuckle Ball]

At the beginning of Dec 76% of dems backed a ceasefire.

Voters Want the U.S. to Call for a Permanent Ceasefire in Gaza and to Prioritize Diplomacy

Sixty-one percent of likely voters support the U.S. calling for a permanent ceasefire and a de-escalation of violence in Gaza.

www.dataforprogress.org

This one says 80% of dems back a ceasefire.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1722685239095419163

Yes, Frank. Biden also backs a ceasefire. If they’d asked him that poll question he would have voted with the 76%.

If you ask those same Dems if they support cutting off military aid to Israel you will get the same result you got in the Senate.


Frank…honestly…you sound increasingly like @Butler1000 in your aggressive ignorance of simple facts. You are approaching the issue like a petulant child who will throw a fit if they cannot immediately get everything they want instantaneously- That’s not how democracy works. If you are unwilling to engage in any form of negotiation or compromise then democracy is not for you.

Unfortunately, your only alternative is to support a guy who will make things exponentially worse than they already are. You are basically fucked no matter what happens. I would suggest stocking up on alcohol, weed, and tissues for what is going to be a long and painful journey for you.

 

[Frankfooter]

Yes, Frank. Biden also backs a ceasefire.

No, he doesn't.
The US blocked all ceasefire attempts at the UN and Biden keeps funding and enabling the genocide.

Frank…honestly…you sound increasingly like @Butler1000 in your aggressive ignorance of simple facts. You are approaching the issue like a petulant child who will throw a fit if they cannot immediately get everything they want instantaneously- That’s not how democracy works. If you are unwilling to engage in any form of negotiation or compromise then democracy is not for you.

Unfortunately, your only alternative is to support a guy who will make things exponentially worse than they already are. You are basically fucked no matter what happens. I would suggest stocking up on alcohol, weed, and tissues for what is going to be a long and painful journey for you.

You mistake my position, I'm pissed at Biden for screwing up his reelection chances by enabling Netanyahu along with being pissed at Netanyahu for the genocide. Otherwise Biden has been pretty good as president, better than quite a few others. He's lost the entire Muslim vote and a good chunk of the youth and progressive votes for this stance.

There are some things you shouldn't compromise on. Backing a rapist or racist. Backing genocide. I know valcazar argues you need to be pragmatic, I argue that you can't enable that behaviour in any form and allow it to gain and remain in power.

 

[Valcazar]

This is state of things.

Why do you misrepresent things in your titles?

Where is this "ruling" you imagine happened?

 

[Valcazar]

I guess you didn't actually read how bad Biden was then?

In case anyone wants to, the relevant material is on page 212 of the report.

 

[y2kmark]

He apparently had trouble remembering his son's death.

You'd swallow anything the righties come up with. Joe responded to a hostile question about the death of his son by meeting the questioner with stony silence. I'm sure he remembered quite well. Some of this shit is just sad...

 

[y2kmark]

Why do you misrepresent things in your titles?

Where is this "ruling" you imagine happened?

Must be MAGA rule or something...

 

[Valcazar]

For a guy who doesn’t “want it” you seem to derive unusual pleasure in posting threads like this. It’s basically the only thing you do here.

He also doesn't "want" war crimes in the Gaza strip, he just thinks they are "an inevitable consequence of the present political reality" and so therefore Israel should commit them with purpose and a triumphant will.

And yes, as a result of the hardships of the Great Depression many good things came about. History shows chaos is a ladder to betterment.

This is the morality in a nutshell.
The Great Depression led to WWII, the rise of Fascism, and totalitarian control over much of the world.
Chaos is a ladder to betterment you see.

 

[Valcazar]

In this case the press and Democrats seriously pushed for the 25th to be used on Trump, for far less. Now we have Justice Dept officials, under MERRICK GARLAND, stating the President would be considered incompetent by a jury of his peers in a trial.

(Bolding mine)

You didn't read the report, did you?
Did you just decided to imagine what was in it or was this just the narrative you were told and since you agreed with it you didn't bother to check?

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24414202/240208-hur-report.pdf

(You might want to start at the end of page 218 - part D of the section titled: "THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT".)

 

[WyattEarp]

Exactly. A lifelong Republican operative went outside the norms to question the competency of the president. This is scandalous. Imagine if Jack Smith did that? The GOP would shit a brick. It should be pointed out that this tool is trying to tip the scales.

I actually agree with you the comments were gratuitous. However, I don't think this isn't even close to being the first time that a prosecutor unduly made himself a part of the political process. There's a bit of when my guy is taking hits from a prosecutor I am enraged.

These documents cases are not really worth the time DOJ is spending on them. Hur and his Special Counsel were put in the unenviable task of investigating/prosecuting a case they didn't want to pursue against a sitting President running for re-election. I really don't know what he should have given for a reason for not prosecuting, but his choice of words were poor. Let's face it. This Special Counsel was called to make it this case look like it was being treated with the same seriousness as Trump's document case.

And at the end of it all, we know Biden had mishandled (and shared) classified documents and classified information as a Vice President and Senator. Those are facts. So where was this case to go, but another political clusterfuck?

Having said that, there won't be any lasting damage to Biden politically. People can see he has slowed down and have decided what they are going to decide regardless.

 

[Butler1000]

Capable to commit crimes, rape and insurrect?

Then yes, he is more than capable, he is prolifically capable, adept and well suited.

Can't answer means no. You don't think he is.

 

[Butler1000]

Okay…so your definition of an effective president does not include one that is committed to protecting democracy.

You have answered my question.

In answer to your question, I will support the candidate that is not a fascist.

So your answer, by avoiding it,is no, he isn't.

 

[Butler1000]

You'd swallow anything the righties come up with. Joe responded to a hostile question about the death of his son by meeting the questioner with stony silence. I'm sure he remembered quite well. Some of this shit is just sad...

What's sad is the cover up of an incompetent because the Dem refuse to get rid of 80+ year olds in their leadership.

 

[Butler1000]

(Bolding mine)

You didn't read the report, did you?
Did you just decided to imagine what was in it or was this just the narrative you were told and since you agreed with it you didn't bother to check?

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24414202/240208-hur-report.pdf

(You might want to start at the end of page 218 - part D of the section titled: "THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT".)

Do you think Biden is Cognatively sound enough to serve as POTUS for 5 more years?

 

[Knuckle Ball]

So your answer, by avoiding it,is no, he isn't.

To be clear, I wouldn’t give af if Biden had completely lost his marbles. He would still have the muscle memory to protect democracy which places him significantly above the fascist you keep supporting.

My standards are not particularly high at this point. If Trump takes power it will be the last election we will ever see. That doesn’t seem to be a deal breaker for you…in fact, you seem to kinda like it.

 

[Knuckle Ball]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756143448607138024

Mitch:

Nobody gives af what The Candyman has to say about this or anything else.

Jackson Reportedly Known as 'Candy Man,' Democrat Says

Ronny Jackson's nomination to head the VA has become engulfed in controversy.

www.newsweek.com