Its a simple question. Yes, no, or I don't know. Context isn't needed. And as I said, a replacement cleans Trump's clock.
Joe Biden ruled as too incompetent to face charges
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
Again. Take Trump out of the equation. Do you think he is capable for the next 5 years? Just him. In his present state and only getting worse.
So, here's your problem.
1. You can't take Trump out of the equation, as Trump IS the equation.
2. If you did remove Trump, the Base would insert a Trump clone substitute like Vivek or DeSantis.
So it will necessarily be JB vs Trump / a Trump clone substitute.
Capable to commit crimes, rape and insurrect?
Then yes, he is more than capable, he is prolifically capable, adept and well suited.
Okay…so your definition of an effective president does not include one that is committed to protecting democracy.
You have answered my question.
In answer to your question, I will support the candidate that is not a fascist.
I wouldn’t bet against it. Fascist snowflakes are the biggest of all whiners, especially when getting their own sh*t served back in their faces.
One unkind post and they immediately drop to the fetal position and soil their adult diapers.
I'm sorry. Your post was so silly. I didn't want to have to take anything away from the man you thought cured Covid and I guessed saved the world.
You should've a picked up on the humor of the cheerleader in the photo and my comment about cheerleaders preceding it.
Last edited:
Yes, Frank. Biden also backs a ceasefire. If they’d asked him that poll question he would have voted with the 76%.At the beginning of Dec 76% of dems backed a ceasefire.
Voters Want the U.S. to Call for a Permanent Ceasefire in Gaza and to Prioritize Diplomacy
Sixty-one percent of likely voters support the U.S. calling for a permanent ceasefire and a de-escalation of violence in Gaza.www.dataforprogress.org
This one says 80% of dems back a ceasefire.
If you ask those same Dems if they support cutting off military aid to Israel you will get the same result you got in the Senate.
Frank…honestly…you sound increasingly like @Butler1000 in your aggressive ignorance of simple facts. You are approaching the issue like a petulant child who will throw a fit if they cannot immediately get everything they want instantaneously- That’s not how democracy works. If you are unwilling to engage in any form of negotiation or compromise then democracy is not for you.
Unfortunately, your only alternative is to support a guy who will make things exponentially worse than they already are. You are basically fucked no matter what happens. I would suggest stocking up on alcohol, weed, and tissues for what is going to be a long and painful journey for you.
No, he doesn't.
The US blocked all ceasefire attempts at the UN and Biden keeps funding and enabling the genocide.
You mistake my position, I'm pissed at Biden for screwing up his reelection chances by enabling Netanyahu along with being pissed at Netanyahu for the genocide. Otherwise Biden has been pretty good as president, better than quite a few others. He's lost the entire Muslim vote and a good chunk of the youth and progressive votes for this stance.
There are some things you shouldn't compromise on. Backing a rapist or racist. Backing genocide. I know valcazar argues you need to be pragmatic, I argue that you can't enable that behaviour in any form and allow it to gain and remain in power.
Why do you misrepresent things in your titles?
Where is this "ruling" you imagine happened?
In case anyone wants to, the relevant material is on page 212 of the report.
You'd swallow anything the righties come up with. Joe responded to a hostile question about the death of his son by meeting the questioner with stony silence. I'm sure he remembered quite well. Some of this shit is just sad
...
He also doesn't "want" war crimes in the Gaza strip, he just thinks they are "an inevitable consequence of the present political reality" and so therefore Israel should commit them with purpose and a triumphant will.
This is the morality in a nutshell.
The Great Depression led to WWII, the rise of Fascism, and totalitarian control over much of the world.
Chaos is a ladder to betterment you see.
(Bolding mine)
You didn't read the report, did you?
Did you just decided to imagine what was in it or was this just the narrative you were told and since you agreed with it you didn't bother to check?
(You might want to start at the end of page 218 - part D of the section titled: "THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT".)
I actually agree with you the comments were gratuitous. However, I don't think this isn't even close to being the first time that a prosecutor unduly made himself a part of the political process. There's a bit of when my guy is taking hits from a prosecutor I am enraged.
These documents cases are not really worth the time DOJ is spending on them. Hur and his Special Counsel were put in the unenviable task of investigating/prosecuting a case they didn't want to pursue against a sitting President running for re-election. I really don't know what he should have given for a reason for not prosecuting, but his choice of words were poor. Let's face it. This Special Counsel was called to make it this case look like it was being treated with the same seriousness as Trump's document case.
And at the end of it all, we know Biden had mishandled (and shared) classified documents and classified information as a Vice President and Senator. Those are facts. So where was this case to go, but another political clusterfuck?
Having said that, there won't be any lasting damage to Biden politically. People can see he has slowed down and have decided what they are going to decide regardless.
