Yeah, Danny. I got straight F's in undergrad. That's how I got into law school.
I'm guessing that the reason you hate lawyers so much is that you never quite made it into a law school with your own marks.
Last edited:
Will NATO bomb the Houthis??
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
I'm guessing that the reason you hate lawyers so much is that you never quite made it into a law school with your own marks.
Frankie, every European in the early twentieth century was "racist" - fact. That was the prevailing view.
What has that got to do with a century later?
Just the same way I'm a "racist". Got it.
I think that the USN will missile the Hooters until they destroy their ability to strike offensively. And then the Hooters will be castrated until the Ayatollahs give them more missiles.
And the Hooters have no right to strike other people's ships and will misbehave until they're kicked hard enough to make them stop. And it's in everyone's interest that this happen asap.
And this has nothing to do with "colonialism" or "racism" or any other of your little tantrums.
Hahaha, law school are for the ones who cannot get a grasp on science, as is well demonstrated by you.
I guess we should not be too hard on them; they have to find a way of making a living, however dishonest
The evidence says no.
As long as there have been lawyers, their reason for being have always been to provide cover for the powerful against the powerless.
What better example than your support of Israel's genocide and wanton destruction of Gaza.
Every atrocity performed by Hitler, Stalin and Genesis Khan was enthusiastically approved by the legal profession.
Last edited:
Took you a few minutes to think out the last half of that retort and edit your post and add it, huh?
Guess that "facts and logic" isn't working that well for you this morning.
Israel is really the last settler colonialist state.
its the last built on that mentality and maintained through violence.
but when Islamists conquered Egypt, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and much of Afghanistan does that count as colonialism?
Question, do you think if Russia did not have nukes, the US would have been flying F16 and missiles launched from the sea and picking them apart within a few weeks in aid of Ukraine? I believe and think that the only reason they do not engage directly with big players is to avoid the possibility of a nuclear holocaust.
I agree they can't go on the ground. Realty is it is nearly impossible for armies to contain a country on the ground long term but I don't believe Russia would be able to hold off a shock and awe campaign in a conventional war which would be used just to stop them from harassing Ukraine if no nukes were in the game.
on the other hand, I believe CHina would have a better chance against the US in a conventional war.
on the other hand, I believe CHina would have a better chance against the US in a conventional war.
They could air strike those rail links and those bridges from Crimea and starve the Russian army out. It's pretty starve-y anyway. But Uncle Sam would tighten those belts a lot more.
How is it racist?
If I call Russians "Russkies" and Frenchmen "Frenchies", does that make me racist too?
Do you even think before you post?
Depends how fuck-awful the Chinese army actually is.
Commentators were suggesting that it would grossly underperform its theoretical capability as early as a couple of years ago.
Well, "equally powered countries" have frequently fought each other since WW2. Example would be Iran and Iraq.
The only superpower clash has been along the Amur River and those were brief skirmishes.
