And -39 in Edmonton tomorrow
https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/edmonton-weather-cold-snow-flurries-wind-chill
https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/edmonton-weather-cold-snow-flurries-wind-chill
I know that you know this difference between weather and climate so you are just trolling,And -39 in Edmonton tomorrow
https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/edmonton-weather-cold-snow-flurries-wind-chill
As I said many times before IMO global warming is a giant pile of exaggerated bullshit.I know that you know this difference between weather and climate so you are just trolling
if you admit that there is a tiny bit of warming then you must agree that global warming is occurring.As I said many times before IMO global warming is a giant pile of exaggerated bullshit.
Yes there's a tiny bit of warming but its not gonna melt the poles, nor the Greenland ice sheet.
The only thing thats gonna melt is your wallet from the extra carbon taxes we have to pay
Wanna do a little Q & A??if you admit that there is a tiny bit of warming then you must agree that global warming is occurring.
do you know what the difference in an ice bue is at 0 degrees compared ed to 1 degree. It does not take much in the difference in temperature to have significant impact.
If I understand correctly, that significant impact of climate changeif you admit that there is a tiny bit of warming then you must agree that global warming is occurring.
do you know what the difference in an ice bue is at 0 degrees compared ed to 1 degree. It does not take much in the difference in temperature to have significant impact.
Dude we've always had climate disasters that ain't ever going to change. The only reason damages and insurance costs are higher is because we have more population and more buildings. I mean to think that by plowing trillions of dollars into fighting the climate bogeyman that somehow natural disasters aren't going to occur is sheer lunacy.Except that damage from climate change disasters, insurance costs and oil subsidies massively dwarf this.
The latest reports say we are very close to hitting 5 tipping points, where the damage gets massively worse and becomes not reversible for centuries.
![]()
Earth on verge of five catastrophic climate tipping points, scientists warn
Humanity faces ‘devastating domino effects’ including mass displacement and financial ruin as planet warmswww.theguardian.com
I have a question...if you admit that there is a tiny bit of warming then you must agree that global warming is occurring.
do you know what the difference in an ice bue is at 0 degrees compared ed to 1 degree. It does not take much in the difference in temperature to have significant impact.
Your ignorance never ceases to amaze Frankie.Who cares about John Kerry?
It depends upon what you consider a catastrophe. Climate change will lead to lower crop yields, changing livability of many geographies, increased weather events, and many incremental changes which will affect the cost and quality of life for many people. The impacts will increase, even if slowly, over time. It will become like a snowball, rolling down hill, which is an ironic example given the topic.If I understand correctly, that significant impact of climate change
would be something like humanity will be facing impending climate
catastrophe and eventually human extinction unless global
emission is halved by 2030. Apparently calling the impact 'significant'
an understatement would itself be another understatement.
Seriously do people actually believe in such climate BS?
sureWanna do a little Q & A??
I ask you a bunch of questions and you answer in your own words to the best of your ability
John Kerry is a big shot in the climate movement...........................................
I'd say that he's someone people should care about.
We have been pumping out CO2's since industrial age started.sure
Carbon taxes make it more expensive to burn carbon and offset those by using the tax revenue to invest in renewables.I have a question...
Can you demonstrate mathematically how revenue collected in the form of carbon tax improves the climate? Mathematically not theoretically.
1 IAU is only about 4.5ºC.We have been pumping out CO2's since industrial age started.
There were actually 2 industrial ages, but to simplify lets say the industrial age started around 1900.
So for the last 124 years we've been putting tons and tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.
Earth temperature has only heated up about 1.5 celsius.
Last time I checked Greenland, arctic and antarctic temperatures were still well into the -30C, -40C and -50C.
Mainland Greenland perhaps a bit warmer, but not by much.
Since we only have about 45 years of oil left (or approximately 1/3 of the 2/3 CO2 we've already put out into the atmosphere), how could that possibly lower the Greenland, arctic and antarctic temperatures to the point where all 3 melt and flood the entire world??
This sounds more like an attempt to phrase the dire warningsIt depends upon what you consider a catastrophe. Climate change will lead to lower crop yields, changing livability of many geographies, increased weather events, and many incremental changes which will affect the cost and quality of life for many people. The impacts will increase, even if slowly, over time. It will become like a snowball, rolling down hill, which is an ironic example given the topic.
Palm trees at the poles....haha that's funny! They have their hooks in you don't they? Lol!1 IAU is only about 4.5ºC.
IAU stands for Ice Age Unit.
![]()
World will still be pumping oil 45 years from now and beyond into the.................................................
Since we only have about 45 years of oil left (or approximately 1/3 of the 2/3 CO2 we've already put out into the atmosphere), how could that possibly lower the Greenland, arctic and antarctic temperatures to the point where all 3 melt and flood the entire world??
Wow, I had no idea you were that ignorant.Palm trees at the poles....haha that's funny! They have their hooks in you don't they? Lol!
Better write an extra carbon tax cheque to keep the poles from becoming paradise! Lol! OMFG
I have no idea whether those stats are correct but I am prepared to assume that they are.We have been pumping out CO2's since industrial age started.
There were actually 2 industrial ages, but to simplify lets say the industrial age started around 1900.
So for the last 124 years we've been putting tons and tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.
Earth temperature has only heated up about 1.5 celsius.
Last time I checked Greenland, arctic and antarctic temperatures were still well into the -30C, -40C and -50C.
Mainland Greenland perhaps a bit warmer, but not by much.
Since we only have about 45 years of oil left (or approximately 1/3 of the 2/3 CO2 we've already put out into the atmosphere), how could that possibly lower the Greenland, arctic and antarctic temperatures to the point where all 3 melt and flood the entire world??