That's definitely a crazy idea, seeing as it's counterintuitive. Less incentive = more construction?Saw this program on CBC TV last night. One of the crazy ideas to spur more construction is to control the rent.
Capitalism has been defined.It is not just the rent itself. It is the expectations of landlords. There are bidding wars for apartments. You don’t fill out applications anymore. You make offers. Some want 3 times the rent in income. If average 2 bedrooms are 3K, they want people with a 9K a month income. Where are they finding that? And they want 2 months plus last month upfront. It is outrageous. And yet it is happening everyday and people are renting this way because they have no choice.
So you can buy it but you cannot sell it? Seems profitableWe need an Hydro-Ontario for lodging. Construction is unionized. You buy the unit but only the state can buy back snd resell. We need a million of such units. Like electricity it will be profitable for all.
you can only sell it back to the state. If you invest in rénovation it will be taken into account. Some countries in Europe have similar model.So you can buy it but you cannot sell it? Seems profitable
Same with the houses on Toronto Islands.you can only sell it back to the state. If you invest in rénovation it will be taken into account. Some countries in Europe have similar model.
Sounds like communismyou can only sell it back to the state. If you invest in rénovation it will be taken into account. Some countries in Europe have similar model.
I’ve seen renters come in with 6 months rent upfront in order to secure a rental unit.It is not just the rent itself. It is the expectations of landlords. There are bidding wars for apartments. You don’t fill out applications anymore. You make offers. Some want 3 times the rent in income. If average 2 bedrooms are 3K, they want people with a 9K a month income. Where are they finding that? And they want 2 months plus last month upfront. It is outrageous. And yet it is happening everyday and people are renting this way because they have no choice.
Make sure he/she is a roommate and you are not co-habiting or you might unknowingly have a common law spouse.A couple or two roommates making 70k each can easily hit the 9k a month requirement.
Sound like understanding that having a roof over your head should be a necessity and not a privilege.Sounds like communism
Capitalism says though that we all benefit if ppl are scared to end up in a homeless shelter or on the street.Sound like understanding that having a roof over your head should be a necessity and not a privilege.
We will all benefit from it.
It goes both ways.Capitalism says though that we all benefit if ppl are scared to end up in a homeless shelter or on the street.
How do you incentivize someone who has a guaranteed roof over their head? It’s like living with one’s mother forever. Why would they not smoke weed all day and play video games?
i never mentioned that it would be free. I stated that like electricity you still need to pay the roof. But because its built by the government its affordable.Capitalism says though that we all benefit if ppl are scared to end up in a homeless shelter or on the street.
How do you incentivize someone who has a guaranteed roof over their head? It’s like living with one’s mother forever. Why would they not smoke weed all day and play video games?