Fu#k Pierre Poilievre too , this clown supports war crimes and genocide that the IDF is doing now in Gaza.
he same crap like Trudeau too
he same crap like Trudeau too
You should be praising Piers for bringing both sides on. I know you only want the Hamas terrorist narrative but Piers is being very fair in his coverage.
As usual totally right. Now if you want to look at desecration of Jewish cemeteries by Muslim or Palestinian sympathizers multiply by 100.
How long do you think it will be before the bbc has to retract that and apologize.The BBC exposes another series of lies about hospitals in Gaza
So Gaza is Israel's responsibility? Supply the. Water food and power yet they celebrate the massacre of jews on Oct 7? You play right by hamas propaganda.That's insane.
Blocking all food and water is clearly not 'avoiding unnecessary civilian deaths'.
Its trying to cause as many as you can.
They don't have a fraction of credibility...The BBC exposes another series of lies about hospitals in Gaza
Hate has a home everywhere.
What I find strange is the way that some progressives complain about authoritarianism and religious extremism but are happy to make excuses for Hamas or Iran.
I love it when 'experts' don't provide references for their 'opinions'. The reasons are obvious.Under international law it's not that cut and dry. The rules of war still require a proportional proportionality analysis unless it's self-defense, but for it to be self-defense attacks have to be originating from the hospital or anticipated to originate from the hospital at the time the strike is initiated.
Your enemy is allowed to be at hospitals. They can be there tending to wounded, the can be there being tended to as wounded, they can be there visiting family, they can be there just hanging out. Even if it was a Hamas-only military field hospital, there are still parts of Geneva, Hague and Rome that apply protecting it. All hospitals are protected targets. Bring a protected target doesn't mean you can't attack them ever, but it means there are very strict conditions on when you can and "there are enemy there" is not sufficient. Certainly "there are probably some enemy there" isn't sufficient.