en.wikipedia.org
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Not really. It's not a surprise that repeat immunization might wear down the immune response over time. That doesn't mean that being unvaccinated is preferable to having a progressively weaker response to the vaccines.IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein - PubMed
Less than a year after the global emergence of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, a novel vaccine platform based on mRNA technology was introduced to the market. Globally, around 13.38 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses of diverse platforms have been administered. To date, 72.3% of the total population has...
The plot thickens...
You obviously haven't watched one minute of his videos. Gotta love the left anyone who disagrees with them is a quack/conspiracy theorist/racist/white supremacist. Go live in China if you want authoritarian rule then."Doctor" John Campbell is a notorious anti vaxx quack and COVID bullshit merchant.
John Campbell (YouTuber) - Wikipedia
The entire medical profession thinks he's a kook and a grifter. That's why he is characterized as such on wiki.
As the new saying today goes "let it cook". That said, who knows if there's anything out there or not. I'm living my life.
"Doctor" John Campbell is a notorious anti vaxx quack and COVID bullshit merchant.
John Campbell (YouTuber) - Wikipedia
In fact, as time passed, I think roughly 6 to 8 months ago, he was rather disappointed and admitted he was wrong about it all based on the information that was coming out about the jabs. I think he may have even apologized for it all and his reasoning was he was going off of what the health officials (whose bosses are the politicians) were telling them to say and/or do.
If you knew anything about him, he was in fact advocating people to get the jab, in particular those who had a genuine fear of what the TV was telling them and those HONEST politicians.
And then he saw how much money he could make on youtube pushing his anti-science interpretation.
I think he is a clear example of audience capture.
You implied he was anti-vacc', he wasn't. So your statement about him was wrong and this is where the discussion about him and his credibility should end.
Sorry but his current videos are generally for an anti-vax audience. That's why people criticize his current posts as anti-vax.
Because he's been reading the data, listening to the hearings (remember the Pfizer exec who admitted that they didn't test for transmission, but yet made the claims, along with Trudeau, your mainstream media, along with celebrities?) he was very disappointed in himself and was sorry.
So why is it there are so many actual Doctors and people in the field who see those same papiers and have completely contradictory conclusions? Sorry but even youtube is full of people looking at that data and showing exactly what the nurse is trying to manipulate.
