Jordan Peterson says Ontario psychologist licence may be suspended over public statements

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,327
3,444
113
Ontario court rules against Jordan Peterson, upholds social media training order
Jordan Peterson holds his arm up as if posing a question while making a speech in Sherwood Park, Alta., in 2018.

Jordan Peterson, who has gained international fame for his bestselling self-help books and lectures, has refused to pay to undergo a media training course ordered by the College of Psychologists of Ontario. (Jason Franson/The Canadian Press)
An Ontario court ruled against psychologist and media personality Jordan Peterson Wednesday, and upheld a regulatory body's order that he take social media training in the wake of complaints about his controversial online posts and statements.

Last November, Peterson, a professor emeritus with the University of Toronto psychology department who is also an author and media commentator, was ordered by the College of Psychologists of Ontario to undergo a coaching program on professionalism in public statements.

That followed numerous complaints to the governing body of Ontario psychologists, of which Peterson is a member, regarding his online commentary directed at politicians, a plus-sized model, and transgender actor Elliot Page, among other issues. You can read more about those social media posts here.

The college's complaints committee concluded his controversial public statements could amount to professional misconduct and ordered Peterson to pay for a media coaching program — noting failure to comply could mean the loss of his licence to practice psychology in the province.

Peterson filed for a judicial review, arguing his political commentary is not under the college's purview.

Peterson says he stands behind statements
Three Ontario Divisional Court judges unanimously dismissed Peterson's application, ruling that the college's decision falls within its mandate to regulate the profession in the public interest and does not affect his freedom of expression.

"The order is not disciplinary and does not prevent Dr. Peterson from expressing himself on controversial topics; it has a minimal impact on his right to freedom of expression," the decision written by Justice Paul Schabas reads, in part. You can read the entire decision at the bottom of this story.

Peterson had said his statements were not made in his capacity as a clinical psychologist, but instead were "off-duty opinions" — an argument the court rejected.

"Dr. Peterson sees himself functioning as a clinical psychologist 'in the broad public space' where he claims to be helping 'millions of people,"' Schabas wrote.

"Peterson cannot have it both ways: he cannot speak as a member of a regulated profession without taking responsibility for the risk of harm that flows from him speaking in that trusted capacity."

In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, before the decision was released, Peterson said that he stands by what he has said, and wished the college luck in its "continued prosecution.

"They're going to need it," he wrote.

Peterson told CBC News in January that he had no intention of giving up his fight with the regulatory body, accusing the college of attempting to stymie his speech and discipline him for his political opinions.

Controversial figure wants to retain licence
He added he no longer treats patients and his career is instead focused on social and political commentary. Similarly, he doesn't regularly lecture at U of T.

However, Peterson has said he wants to retain his licence.

"I deserve it. I earned it. I haven't done anything to justify suspending it, and I don't want to give the hyenas their bones," he said earlier this year.

The college, in a statement released after the decision was issued, said it is committed to carrying out its mandate of protecting the public interest by regulating the practice of psychology.

"The College will review today's decision and undertake next steps in accordance with our mandate and any appropriate legal processes," the statement reads.

Peterson speaks to a crowd in 2018.

Peterson, seen here speaking to a crowd in Sherwood Park, Alta., in 2018, has said he wants to retain his licence, though his career is now largely focused on social and political commentary. (Jason Franson/The Canadian Press)
Peterson's case was watched closely by free speech advocates and regulators in other professions. It featured interveners including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, and LGBTQ+ advocacy group Egale Canada, which said in a statement from Executive Director Helen Kennedy that communities her organization represents often face discrimination and barriers when accessing healthcare.

"Today's ruling that as a professional regulatory body, the College of Psychologists of Ontario has the mandate to regulate degrading and demeaning speech by its members, is a step in the right direction in ensuring that 2SLGBTQI individuals can access healthcare safely and without discrimination," Kennedy wrote.

Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) Executive Director Noa Mendelsoh Aviv, meanwhile, said in a statement that the CCLA doesn't endorse Peterson's views, but still argued in court that professional regulatory bodies shouldn't be policing speech that is not directly connected to professional practice.

"Freedom of expression is a right that no individual gives up just because they join a regulated profession," she said.

Peterson rose to prominence through his polarizing YouTube videos critiquing liberal culture and his successful self-help book, 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos.

Here's the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision:

Mobile users: View the document
(PDF KB)

(Text KB)CBC is not responsible for 3rd party content
With files from Adam Carter and The Canadian Press





It looks like if JP wants to continue to identify as a clinical psychologist he’s going to have to comply with the Ontario College of Psychologists’ order that he attend social media training.


🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,379
4,584
113
As always what people forget is governments change, and setting these precedents allows policies you might not agree with to happen.

Restrictions on free speech, and in education is two of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: globalthinker

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,572
2,463
113
As always what people forget is governments change, and setting these precedents allows policies you might not agree with to happen.

Restrictions on free speech, and in education is two of them.
Government’s do change. So do laws.
In the other threads the differences between Ethics and Morals were touched on.

“For the most part”
Laws are changed, or determined might be the better word. By societies morals. This should scare us. Sadly, I doubt it will.

The issue ( for me anyways) is that it’s not hate speech, no matter how distasteful anyone finds some of the things he thinks/says. Who knows, the way the world is becoming bobbleheads, that need safe rooms who one day will be CEOs, Cabinet ministers, . Saying buzz off…….

The CBO and their code of conduct (Ethics)
Why should any…..thing…..be it a company, be it a panel of a few, have so much say, in what we say outside of our work, on social media . Free thought, free expression.

Who got to play god? Choose the people that wrote the Code, that they can dictate what is allowable to think/say……choose who sits on the panel, of a few.

Certainly not the public
 
Last edited:

globalthinker

Member
May 21, 2023
38
37
18
Je
Government’s do change. So do laws.
In the other threads the differences between Ethics and Morals were touched on.

“For the most part”
Laws are changed, or determined might be the better word. By societies morals. This should scare us. Sadly, I doubt it will.

The issue ( for me anyways) is that it’s not hate speech, no matter how distasteful anyone finds some of the things he thinks/says. Who knows, the way the world is becoming bobbleheads, that need safe rooms who one day will be CEOs, Cabinet ministers, . Saying buzz off…….

The CBO and their code of conduct (Ethics)
Why should any…..thing…..be it a company, be it a panel of a few, have so much say, in what we say outside of our work, on social media . Free thought, free expression.

Who got to play god? Choose the people that wrote the Code, that they can dictate what is allowable to think/say……choose who sits on the panel, of a few.

Certainly not the public
he will lose his license to practice as his professional body will say he did professional misconduct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,572
2,463
113
Je

he will lose his license to practice as his professional body will say he did professional misconduct.
True.
But it’s not defined that way in their own code. Which explicitly states. They have domain, when conducting business…actively engaged in servicing a client….

simple solutions.
1) waste a few hours of his life

2) Change their code of conduct, so that going forward….
 
Toronto Escorts