Yes. Because PP is more incompetent and a bigger nincompoop.
not possible
Neither do I, that's why you know this guy is a white supremacist.
i never called him a white supremacist.
you called both a white supremacist. & a conservative
Don't have to. He's not upset about what children can't do. He's upset about what "white children" can't do
You say maybe it's climate change. Sure. That only affects white kids? No, it would affect all kids. But he doesn't care about all kids.
and you base that on half a sentence you admit you could not hear clearly?
If you think it's ok to only care about white kids, then there's a term for you.
what a nasty accusation that is
what is wrong with you?
what part of "I do not define children by race" can you not understand ?
You can't protect yourself by telling your enemies what your defenses are. PPs own party members who know the details and how the security apparatus works are telling him this is a mistake. These aren't Liberals trying to cover something up, there's are Conservatives sitting on the committees.
interference in our election process by an authorities communist regime is an assault on democracy and pretty much the most important threat to national security, short of a shooting war
had the majority of the MPS targeted for influence been conservatives you can bet your last dollar Justin Trudeau would have exposed their names
A perfect example of Justin Trudeau prioritizing his political objectives over the integrity of our election process and national security
It's an independent body. For the PM to fire the BoC chairman is actually more of an overstep then the SNC-Lavalin affair.
its an independent body given its mandate by the government
firing somebody who failed to deliver on the responsibilities attached to a very important mandate is not an overstep, it is prudent and responsible
the SNC-Lavalin affair was not an overstep. that was a perversion of our justice system
he should have resigned over that scandal
Harper ,Jean Chrétien Mulroney governed based on their principles with pragmatism , common sense overlayed & each strived for country unity
Trudeaus liberal party is not the liberal party of Jean Chrétien
You literally just defended him getting involved in a scandal so clearly you heard that part of he speech.
again what part of this do you not understand?
"yeah ok
The rest of us must have missed the speech where he said he will engage in scandals
I do not think you understand what a scandal is "
The Justice Minister is legitimately part of the PMs cabinet and there are reasons the PM might discuss issues with them. But Trudeau pushed it and given that it's supposed to be independent it was an obserstep. But the BoC is supposed to be even more independent than the Justice Minister, and to fire the chairman is a bigger scandal.
no a scandal is when a politician act to hide information or evidence of wrongdoing from the public
PP was quite open & transparent that he did not think Macklin acted quickly enough & this needs to be replaced
if a PM can freeze bank accounts of citizens he most certainly replace the governer of the bank of canada
Once again you know the future?
I am pretty confident he is due for another self-inflicted wound- after all he is a moron
But again, can you be objective? Can you say anything bad about PP or do you think he's a Saint?
he has done nothing to upset me
where as Justin Trudeau has an eight year track record of corruption, scandals and incompetence
Wtf are you talking about? I've said he's not fit for the job. Oh course he needs to go. Are you not reading anything?
PP as the next prime minister is part of the package with " Oh course he needs to go'
you do understand that's how a Canadian Prime Minister is removed from office , don't you?
there is only one way he will go, but you will not vote for PP
all you done is defend Trudeau as better than PP
that is either unbelievable foolish or you are not being honest
