Sorry but plenty of otherwise healthy unvaccinated people suffered hard from covid (and continue to) while people who got the vaccine had far fewer negative impacts. And many of the vulnerable people who died wouldn't have if they were vaccinated.
Higher Number Of COVID Vax Received, Higher RISK Of COVID: Newly Peer Reviewed Study Implies
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
You really just look at my name, assume one thing when I said something else, don't take a moment to think about what I said, do you?
Your statement above IS WHAT I SAID, YOU NIT!
It was the government, in this link to a twitter post, then in other posts it's Pfizer. Either way, it should set off alarm bells for everyone, if it didn't that's really scary that people think "this is fine"
Mr. Joshua (@jvisi1001)
So here’s the deal… Pfizer wanted to wait 75 years before having to release the data to the people. January of ‘22, a judge ordered the FDA to release the data; about 50K pages per month. The article I posted has links to some of the released data of which the article is referring (showing...
nitter.net
Attachments
The great Dr. Peter McCullough as just a rock during this tyranny..
Cool story bro.
Care to actually post evidence that this happened and it isn't something else that you've misunderstood?
You can't expect them to go and read things themselves instead of just repeating what they've been told to believe.
That's asking way to much of them.
Pfizer is fucking evil, but I don't exepct a source to be produced.
And to be fair, I think you're wrong about this as well "I have found that the FDA tried to seal the records for 75 years and went to court." and I would like to see your source for that.
My understanding is that the FDA said that to produce everything the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency FOIA request asked for at a rate of 500 pages per month would take until 2075 or so. There was never an argument that the records should be sealed. I am happy to be corrected if there was an actual attempt by the FDA to seal the records though, so if you can show me that, I would like to see it.
LMAO, Nutbags. Trump, I'm sure wanted to call her a nutbag but afraid of his twat base.
Sorry. You're predisposed to conspiracy theories and I'm predisposed to criticizing you for it.
That's like saying people in jail are being discriminated against.
Sorry. Discrimination is based on characteristics based in the Charter. What you're talking about is consequences for choices. Remember the days when the right idolized Ayn Rand and her philosophy of individual responsibility?
Your "proof" that the FDA tried to seal the documents for 75 years is the case where the FDA offered to begin releasing data immediately?
You just didn't pay attention to what was happening at all did you?
I should have corrected it and said under the guise of "we can't redact all that personal info it's going to take some time" nonsense. They can do all kinds of wild shit with CGI, computing, alorithms, chatGPT, AI, etc, but can't create a program or get A.I. to redact names, keywords?Your "proof" that the FDA tried to seal the documents for 75 years is the case where the FDA offered to begin releasing data immediately?
You just didn't pay attention to what was happening at all did you?
But hey, Pfizer is an angelic company, they received cover from governments, zero liability and plenty of complications going on now with hundreds if not thousands of questions regarding their jabs.
You do you, you have strong buyer's remorse and zero balls to admit you were suckered, too much ego. New COVID wave coming, better get in line for the next jab and the one after that and the one after that and......
Hope you don't go to a casino, because once you lose, it looks like you're the type that will keep chasing that lost money.
You're pretty gullible, I see. ("I should have corrected it" - like you fucking knew the details until you got caught out.)I should have corrected it and said under the guise of "we can't redact all that personal info it's going to take some time" nonsense. They can do all kinds of wild shit with CGI, computing, alorithms, chatGPT, AI, etc, but can't create a program or get A.I. to redact names, keywords?
No, you can't fucking trust an automated pass on redaction.
That's a way to guarantee errors.
Can they go faster with better tools over time? Sure.
But "they're lying about this in order to hide shit for 75 years" is just paranoia.
Pfizer is a fucking evil company and everyone knows it.
Doesn't change the reality.
And now they have zero liability with the shots you were told would save your life. lol
That "fucking evil company" whose product you have in your body. The same company whose rep told a European Commission government official they didn't test if it did or didn't prevent transmission, but their CEO, Fauci, politicians, celebrities and your TV told you it did. LOL
And you're trying to get all "got ya" with me.
Buddy, you got lied to and took it. lol
You have a LOT of emotional investment in this narrative, Jubee.
It's probably not healthy for you.
Tom Fitton is the scumbag who has been fingered as the guy who advised Dum-dum Trump-Trump to retain the classified documents and who told his Dumness Trumpy that he could declassify government documents by fingering his balls and saying "Ooga-bwooga" 3 times.
The guy is a total grifter.
