Cops taze and arrest homeless man for simply walking across the street
- Thread starter stinkynuts
- Start date
No reason. The powerful preying on the weak.
A homeless man who has nothing is struggling to literally survive on the streets. He crosses the street in the middle, like everyone does. That's enough reason to stop him, demand ID, taze him, and arrest him. Had this been a rich white guy, nothing would have happened.
Half the officers dealing with the homeless male were black.
Jaywalking is a crime in Georgia, so the offender must identify himself.
The male threatened officers to a fight, which justifies the use of a Taser according to American Use of Force guidelines. He wasn't tased for jaywalking.
The offender was at another location, probably causing problems which is why the officers had to reattend and arrest to stop problems.
There will be no lawsuit.
Educate yourself.
Is It Illegal To Jaywalk In Georgia? | Georgia Auto Law
Use of force - Wikipedia
Use of force continuum - Wikipedia
If you want to look for real injustice, you should examine the tens of thousands of innocent people who die each year because of malpractice, and how those Doctors can continue to practice.
Last edited:
No, you just don't realize that the media warps the narrative and you swallow it hook, line and sinker.
Here's a classic example of the CBC warping the narrative saying the RCMP needs to go.
Is it time to rethink the RCMP? These communities think so | CBC.ca
The broadcaster completely ignores the fact that the City of Surrey thinks otherwise and has decided to stay with the RCMP and end the transition to a municipal force. I now live out here in British Columbia. Surrey Police Service will be no more soon. The largest RCMP Detachment in Canada will continue to be the municipal police for Surrey, B.C.
Surrey votes to keep RCMP | CTV News
Don't look for the flashy headlines that look like controversy. Do your own research.
Last edited:
Good Defense arguments.
He was free to go under arrest. You do not have to then for yourself until. He was never put under arrest.
Is words for fight could have easily been used 2 I'm going to disagree with you. What are regional person say that he plan to use violence against the police? Since the rest for the challenge to fight was made several minutes after no violent Action and they had decided to let him go and return to arrest him for the threat which was not a threat. The police themselves thought that he was not making a threat.
Notice that no Miranda rights were made during the arrest. Miranda violation's allow For a lawsuit . Fruit from poisonous tree after all
You need to look up the difference between arrest and detention.
You are only seeing a redacted video. You don't know if he was read his rights after arrest. As well, you are also wrong on Miranda Rights violations and lawsuits.
Miranda Rights (history.com)
There are no grounds for a lawsuit in this scenario.
Last edited:
Well surprise surprise. The new supreme court in 2022 change the law. You can no longer sue For this violation.
Well I don't know much about us law So good catch. However you Argument as a link is very poor. It should have been you were correct until 2022 with the new supreme court ruling...
Which has a side note is a bad ruling..
Supreme Court To Citizens: Miranda Rights Aren’t Actually Rights So No More Suing About Them
The “Miranda rights” established by the Supreme Court in 1966 are a little less guaranteed going forward. The Supreme Court has issued an opinion [PDF] that limits what citizens whose r…
www.techdirt.com
In Canada detention doesn't gives no obligation to I'd yourself. The police suspect you Might have a warrant They can arrest you at this point. Until actual arrest you have no No legal obligation.
I'm uncharted about the US. Please give links.
Did you look up arrest and detention?Well surprise surprise. The new supreme court in 2022 change the law. You can no longer sue For this violation.
Well I don't know much about us law So good catch. However you Argument as a link is very poor. It should have been you were correct until 2022 with the new supreme court ruling...
Which has a side note is a bad ruling..
Supreme Court To Citizens: Miranda Rights Aren’t Actually Rights So No More Suing About Them
The “Miranda rights” established by the Supreme Court in 1966 are a little less guaranteed going forward. The Supreme Court has issued an opinion [PDF] that limits what citizens whose r…
In Canada detention doesn't gives no obligation to I'd yourself. The police suspect you Might have a warrant They can arrest you at this point. Until actual arrest you have no No legal obligation.
I'm uncharted about the US. Please give links.
I don't know where you are getting your information, but if you have been informed by police you are DETAINED in Canada, you MUST identify yourself. Otherwise you will be ARRESTED for Obstruction.
If the police just want to stop and talk to you and don't inform you that you have been detained for an offense, you don't have to identify yourself. This is called a Street Check.
New changes to policing | ontario.ca
Can You Refuse to Show ID to Police in Canada? | Collett Read LLP
Last edited:
The website you provided it's contradictory An wrong. In Canada you do not have a legal requirement to carry ID With exceptions such as driving. Therefore there is never a legal requirement to provide identification Which this site says you must provide. Maybe they must spoke but technically information here is wrong.
With the some exceptions you have the absolute right to remain silent if detained. You do not have to answer any questions Including who you are ... With exceptions to do with if you were driver etc
[/URL]
Just like riding a bicycle When you are walking you do not have to carry any id What so ever. They are never is illegal requirement to show ID just because you're walking down the street Even if detained or arrested. Because bicycles are considered vehicles You are required to deny yourself though you do not have to present ID.
But this girl I'll be wrong of course. Ed and the case of the G20 famous nobody case Police can break rights And laws without consequence.
Last edited:
Your link does not work.
Neither websites I referenced are contradictory. Both made it clear if you are being detained for a crime, you need to identify yourself.
New changes to policing | ontario.ca
As of January 1, 2017, if a police officer asks you for ID in a situation when the rules apply, they must:
- have a reason, which cannot be:
- based on race
- arbitrary (not meaningful)
- only because you are in a high-crime area
- because you refused to answer a question or walked away
- tell you why they want your identifying information
- tell you that you can refuse to give identifying information
- offer you a receipt – even if you refuse to share information – that includes:
- the officer’s name
- the officer’s badge number
- how to contact the Office of the Independent Police Review Director, which handles complaints about police in Ontario
- who to contact to access personal information about you that the police service has on file
- Keep detailed records of their interaction with you – even if you refuse to share information
New rules for street checks do not apply if the officer is:
- talking to a driver during a traffic stop
- arresting or detaining you
- executing a warrant
- investigating a specific crime
Can You Refuse to Show ID to Police in Canada? | Collett Read LLP
You can refuse to show your ID to police if you are a passenger in a vehicle or if they stop you on the street, unless they are investigating a crime that has occurred or they are detaining you.
Last edited:
