Hot Pink List

Would you support an asbolute ban on all guns?

Would you support an absolute ban on guns like countries such as Japan does?

  • Yes, I think it would be better in general if guns were banned

    Votes: 51 47.2%
  • No, I think the restrictions we have in place are good enough

    Votes: 38 35.2%
  • No, I think we should make guns more accessible, like the US

    Votes: 19 17.6%

  • Total voters
    108

Mr Deeds

Muff Diver Extraordinaire
Mar 10, 2013
6,312
3,474
113
Here
If you're talking about Canada I think the restrictions are pretty good. But batting them completely is not realistic as there are people in this country who use them to hunt to feed their families
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,937
9,350
113
I think I would be completely for banning weapons or at the very least the majority of calibers. If someone requires to hunt etc., then they can apply for special licenses. But guns should be a privilege, not a right.
 

johnd5050

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2012
2,758
3,492
113
I think I would be completely for banning weapons or at the very least the majority of calibers. If someone requires to hunt etc., then they can apply for special licenses. But guns should be a privilege, not a right.
A good place to securely leave your hunting guns is in a government or private owned armory.
Just log it out and in when you need to go hunting. There should be an annual quota for hunting ammo.
 

johnd5050

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2012
2,758
3,492
113
If you're talking about Canada I think the restrictions are pretty good. But batting them completely is not realistic as there are people in this country who use them to hunt to feed their families
Beside hunting for food, Canada generates revenue from fishing and sport hunters from all over the world but mostly USA.
 

rgkv

old timer
Nov 14, 2005
4,001
1,535
113
This is the mentality down south,, forget her name but some broad in the states saying her 2 YEAR OLD GRANDSON already owns a couple of guns...
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
Guns yes. Rifles no.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,176
7,805
113
Room 112
In countries with absolute bans, there are essentially no murders or suicides by firearms.

Is it worth banning all guns, or should we allow them, or loosen restrictions like the US?

Countries with absolute bans on guns include China and North Korea yet there are many murders by firearms...at the hands of government officials.

I think what you are meaning to say in countries like U.K., Australia, Japan, New Zealand etc. where there are strong restrictions on gun ownership there are essentially no murders or suicides by firearm. Now what do those four countries I listed all have in common - they are surrounded by water.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,937
9,350
113
Countries with absolute bans on guns include China and North Korea yet there are many murders by firearms...at the hands of government officials.

I think what you are meaning to say in countries like U.K., Australia, Japan, New Zealand etc. where there are strong restrictions on gun ownership there are essentially no murders or suicides by firearm. Now what do those four countries I listed all have in common - they are surrounded by water.
There are other developing countries and even countries in EU, who have almost no gun violence as well. The only common thing between them are strong gun restrictions.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,689
2,587
113
The vast majority of gun crimes committed in Canada are by unlicensed gun owners using smuggled firearms from the US. I'm not sure a "gun ban" would make much of a difference here in Canada. Kind of like banning murder. It's already illegal yet many murders are continually committed.

In the grand scheme of things, it's not the legal gun owners in Canada you have to worry about.

Tougher sentences on those who commit gun crimes and repeat offenders would make more of a difference than taking away guns from legal gun owners.
 

SaturnFan

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2009
1,029
311
83
I live in an urban environment and don't hunt, so I have no interest in guns. Having said this I can see that farmers need a rifle or two to protect their animals and livestock, and I can see that some people have an interest in target shooting with either a handgun or rifle. From what I know (and that's not much!) about how to legally obtain and own a hand gun or rifle I believe the current laws on the books in Canada are satisfactory.

What I don't understand is why are automatic, and semi automatic rifles permitted for Joe Public??? I see absolutely no reason why the average person should own one!
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,611
1,375
113
A ban on guns would mean that the criminals would have guns and the ordinary citizen will not have guns. The vast majority of crime and murders are committed by criminals and not the outraged BF or husband. The countries with little gun crime are mostly islands and have strict gun laws. Canada has strict gun laws, yet we have shootings in the streets of major Canadian cities weekly. We live next to the USA that have laxed gun laws and the illegal guns come in to Canada through the Indian reservations that straddle the Canada/US border. After the Ecole Polytechnique shootings in Montreal the government did not ban the Mini-14 ( a simplified version of an assault rifle ) which can fire as fast as you can pull the trigger. The reason for not banning the Mini-14 is that many native and Inuit bands use this rifle for hunting food.

To make gun laws tougher than they are now is not a guarantee that it will make any difference all. An analogy to this situation can be compared to what they are doing to address the homeless situation in California. Homeless street people are given small homes without addressing their mental health or addiction problems.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gators
Toronto Escorts