Where do "3 year olds" and puberty blockers appear in the same sentence, Butler?
Its offical : Transphobia is here to stay!
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
- Status
Fascism arrives in Canada through the back door, ushered in by the lefties. Is anyone surprised?
The LGBTQ community has been been a persecuted minority for a long time.
Now right wingers are picking on a tiny minority (trans youth) of a tiny minority (trans) of a tiny minority (LGTBQ) to target the entire group.
Its a dog whistle to anger the base and get the pitchforks out.
They could be talking about real problems, gun violence, inflation, income disparity or any of a large number of other issues but that won't make the base march on the streets.
Even tranny loving jc is willing to pull out the pitchforks on this one.
sad
I do hope they succeed in their goal of getting arrested and fined.
All the power to them.
You are REALLY desperate to dodge the question and not commit to a position here.
Why is that?
I'm asking because "no diagnosis or puberty blockers before 10 years old" and "no diagnosis or puberty blockers before 19 years old" are VERY different things.
I am not sure why you are trying hard to maintain ambiguity and confusion about your position on the matter, but it is weird.
You are usually quite opinionated so why the cultivated ambiguity?
First off, read the literature and don't just repeat what you've been told.
(Or at least read people who have read the literature.)
Secondly - I thought you were AGAINST diagnosis.
Now you are in favor of it after "recognized testing (which takes years)"?
So when can they start this years long process? 10 or 19?
May as will link to the studies (there were two in sort of discussion with each other) since they are downloadable.
Nobody says that "drag is a crime". But, it should be a crime for putting shows on in elementary schools, for putting adolescents on puberty blockers or performing life altering surgeries. Oh, yeah. And shooting 9 year old children should be illegal, too. Even when done by "drag".
Is there someone who has argued that shooting 9-year old children should not be illegal?
I'm not sure anymore. It seems like "drag" wants special rules. We better spell them out.
Which fantasy is that? That we should treat "drag" as victims right after a mass murder by one of their own? Or the fantasy being pushed by Wong-Tam that demands we curtail our basic rights and practice compelled speech?
You know, the Right has this problem that it calls all laws that it doesn't 100% like "fascism". They're "laws". That's the term. Or if you want "Laws we don't like".
They're not "fascism".
how dumb does one need to be to believe that this is real?
- Status
