Ashley Madison

Global warming hits Los Angeles

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,921
7,888
113
This must be "Normal" for Sydney, Australia according to the Climate Change Deniers:

Sydney close to breaking 140-year-old record streak of days under 30C

While most of Australia’s east coast is already experiencing a hot and sticky summer, Sydney’s unusually temperate weather is on track to make records, with the city poised to have its longest spell of days under 30C in over a century.

Thursday became the 325th consecutive day the temperature recorded at Observatory Hill, in the heart of the city, stayed under 30C, with the last day recorded above that being 21 February 2022.

This is the longest time in three decades the city has stayed this cool, and is now just 14 days off the record 339-day streak established between 31 December 1882 and 6 December 1883.

With Victoria and parts of Queensland experiencing heatwave conditions, Bureau of Meteorology forecaster Jonathan How said it “was significant” to have so few days above 30C in Sydney.

“Normally you would expect to see 16 days above 30 degrees [in a year], but last year there were only seven and they were all recorded before 21 February,” How said.

The city is forecast to hit 29C on Sunday, and expected to edge over 30C next Wednesday, which would pull it short of setting a record.

It is already the longest stretch in three decades of sub-30C temperatures, according to Weatherzone.

“As for when we can expect the next 30-degree day, it could be as early as this coming Sunday (15 January) while another surge of warmth is expected next Tuesday ... At this stage, both days are tipped to peak at 29C,” Weatherzone said in a statement.

“If both days fall short of the 30-degree barrier, Sydney will be sitting on its second-longest sub-30C streak. If we make it to 28 January without reaching 30C, it’ll officially be a new record.”

Other parts of the Sydney metropolitan region have experienced multiple days of 30C or higher since last February, but the CBD has remained cool because of La Niña and winds coming in from the East, How said.

“With La Niña, you see increased cloud cover and rain,” he said.

“2022 was Sydney’s wettest year on record, we had significant flooding in March and then again in July. It’s been a really wet and damp year.”

Normally the winds blow westerly, picking up hotter inland temperatures from the Blue Mountains as they come down into the city, but this year the winds coming into Sydney have predominantly come from the east, meaning they are cooler because of the water temperature in the Tasman.
“We need those winds from the west to heat up,” How said. “But we didn’t see that this past year, a lot of the winds were from offshore and had cooling effects.”
The temperate weather is bucking global warming trends, with the World Meteorological Organisation announcing on Thursday that the past eight years were the warmest on record globally, fuelled by ever-rising greenhouse gas concentrations and accumulated heat.

The average global temperature in 2022 was about 1.15C above pre-industrial levels, with 2022 becoming the 8th consecutive year that annual global temperatures have reached at least 1C above pre-industrial levels.

For Sydneysiders, there may be some good beach days on the horizon, but How says those itching for a hot summer will have to be patient.

“La Niña is weakening off, and we are seeing signs indicating we will start to see it warming,” he said.

“It’s more likely to be gradual. We just need to be patient and hopefully we get to see some hot summer days soon. More generally, La Niña is expected to be done with; we are heading into neutral conditions.”

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,951
2,249
113
Ghawar
This must be "Normal" for Sydney, Australia according to the Climate Change Deniers:

Sydney close to breaking 140-year-old record streak of days under 30C
Normal or not rights to growing carbon emission through escalating
oil drilling and coal mining in Australia are not to be denied according
to Climate Change non-Deniers.




Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has poured scorn on critics of the government’s decision to release more than 47,000 square kilometres of ocean for offshore oil and gas exploration, saying fossil fuels still dominate Australia’s energy needs.

The announcement by Resources Minister Madeleine King, which the oil and gas industry and government regard as a “routine” annual event, on Wednesday triggered a burst of outrage from Greens and environmental activists.

They said encouraging extra petroleum extraction was inconsistent with Labor’s 43 per cent emissions reduction target and would threaten marine environments.

When asked at a press conference in Sydney about the release of acreage, Mr Albanese challenged a journalist by pointing out they most likely arrived at the event in a car fuelled by petrol.

“We need to be sensible about this,” Mr Albanese said.
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
“We need to be sensible about this,” Mr Albanese said.

The application of common sense is not an attribute of eco warriors

'stop oil and gas now'
they have absolutely no comprehension of the number of deaths and the amount of human suffering this would cause
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,175
23,669
113
The application of common sense is not an attribute of eco warriors

'stop oil and gas now'
they have absolutely no comprehension of the number of deaths and the amount of human suffering this would cause
Larue, I'm waiting for you to reply.
You claimed there is no experimental proof of climate change.
I gave it to you:

NASA gave you exactly the experimental validation you keep demanding but won't accept because it runs contrary to your faith/dogma that you think you are the smartest person here.
NASA ran an experiment that measured the increase in solar radiation that the models predicted and that we see in the increasing global temperature.
They measured an increase of about 0.5 Watts per square metre over 15 years of measurements.

This is exactly the proof you keep demanding.
So either admit you're wrong or tell us why you think NASA doesn't know what they are talking about.

Direct Observations Confirm That Humans Are Throwing Earth's Energy Budget off Balance

And don't try to pretend you've put me on ignore, we both know you don't know how to do it and are reading these posts.
You just replied, be honest and reply to this and answer the charge.

This is the proof you demanded.
Have at it.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,951
2,249
113
Ghawar
The application of common sense is not an attribute of eco warriors
The ironic thing is Anthony Albanese was voted into the office on the
promise of 'ending the climate war'. He was an eco-warrior during the
election. His common sense might not come as a surprise. After all Steven
Guilbeault is more sensible than he was as a climate activist now that
he is on Trudeau's gravy train.

'stop oil and gas now'
they have absolutely no comprehension of the number of deaths and the amount of human suffering this would cause
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,921
7,888
113
Normal or not rights to growing carbon emission through escalating
oil drilling and coal mining in Australia are not to be denied according
to Climate Change non-Deniers.




Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has poured scorn on critics of the government’s decision to release more than 47,000 square kilometres of ocean for offshore oil and gas exploration, saying fossil fuels still dominate Australia’s energy needs.

The announcement by Resources Minister Madeleine King, which the oil and gas industry and government regard as a “routine” annual event, on Wednesday triggered a burst of outrage from Greens and environmental activists.

They said encouraging extra petroleum extraction was inconsistent with Labor’s 43 per cent emissions reduction target and would threaten marine environments.

When asked at a press conference in Sydney about the release of acreage, Mr Albanese challenged a journalist by pointing out they most likely arrived at the event in a car fuelled by petrol.

“We need to be sensible about this,” Mr Albanese said.

At least PM Albanese has got Australia to move in the right direction with this Climate Change Bill.

The Bill will enshrine into law an emissions reduction target of 43 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050.

It has brought together business, industry, unions, farmers, community and conservation groups, all of whom have asked the Parliament to put Australia on the path to net-zero emissions.

For nine years, Australia has stumbled from one policy to another, and this overdue legislation will provide energy and investment certainty and usher the next generation of economic growth and opportunity.

It locks in 43 per cent as Australia’s target to reduce emissions and ensures a whole-of-government approach to drive towards that target.

It ensures accountability through an annual update to Parliament by the Climate Change Minister on the progress being made towards the target and empowers the Climate Change Authority to provide advice to Government on future targets.

 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,010
3,577
113
Larue, I'm waiting for you to reply.
You claimed there is no experimental proof of climate change.
I gave it to you:

you would not know experimental proof if it ran you over

besides i do not need experimental proof of climate change.
climate changes , always has, always will
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,175
23,669
113
you would not know experimental proof if it ran you over

besides i do not need experimental proof of climate change.
climate changes , always has, always will
Wow, larue, just wow.

First you are claiming you are smarter than NASA again.
Then you move the goal posts and say you don't need experimental proof anymore.
Sounds like your dogma won't let you accept any evidence in any form anymore.

Science is about skepticism and experimental validation and not about ideological dogma or consensus opinion.
Since you won't accept 'consensus' science you're stuck posting 30 year old memes and charts from charlatans paid by the fossil fuel industry and claiming they are the honest ones.
The consensus is the science, larue, there is no question amongst legit scientists that we are experiencing anthropomorphic climate change.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,951
2,249
113
Ghawar
At least PM Albanese has got Australia to move in the right direction with this Climate Change Bill.

The Bill will enshrine into law an emissions reduction target of 43 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050.
Royal Dutch Shell has been ordered by Hague Court in the Netherlands
to reduce emission by 45%
by the end of 2030 compared with 2019. I found wording of the ruling
a bit ambiguous but I believe that the court and the activists who sued
Shell are indeed demanding emission cut of not just operational activities
but Shell's product as well. So the lawsuit filed against Shell in a way
has enshrined into law invention of some type of gas that is no more
than half as carbon-polluting as what we consume today by 2030.

As far as I can see Shell has shown no signs of bringing emission down
since receiving the verdict handed down by the kangaroo court that Hague is.
They have been occupied with exploration and development of new fields,
returning profit to shareholders, planning on spin-off of their renewable
energy division and relocation of their headquarter away from the Netherlands.
Meanwhile the activists, among whom Al Gore's golden boy Roger Cox the
climate lawsuit expert , who brought Shell to the court issued a
threatening letter to Shell's board members warning them of legal risks
to them and shareholders if they don't comply with the verdict. I guess
Shell's CEOs have little to worry about. If they are going to lose in
the appeal they have filed to overturn the emission cut ruling (which very
likely will drag on for years) they can always move their head office
to the U.S.

If Anthony Albanese has already learned a lesson from the Royal
Dutch Shell climate lawsuit saga I can see why he turned to legal procedures
to fight climate change. If Albanese is hold accountable by law by 2030
for all the carbon pollution created by him giving out oil drilling and
coal mining licenses with little regard to the environment it is not likely
he will suffer a fate worse that what will become of Shell's CEOs.

It has brought together business, industry, unions, farmers, community and conservation groups, all of whom have asked the Parliament to put Australia on the path to net-zero emissions.

For nine years, Australia has stumbled from one policy to another, and this overdue legislation will provide energy and investment certainty and usher the next generation of economic growth and opportunity.

It locks in 43 per cent as Australia’s target to reduce emissions and ensures a whole-of-government approach to drive towards that target.

It ensures accountability through an annual update to Parliament by the Climate Change Minister on the progress being made towards the target and empowers the Climate Change Authority to provide advice to Government on future targets.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,175
23,669
113
Royal Dutch Shell has been ordered by Hague Court in the Netherlands
to reduce emission by 45%
Oil despots are still raking in the cash and then asking for more handouts.

 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,312
7,066
113
Oil despots are still raking in the cash and then asking for more handouts.

Meh. That's peanuts compared to the cash oil&GAS SAYS Greta is hauling in by selling a book.

 
Last edited:

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
  • Like
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,951
2,249
113
Ghawar
Meh. That's peanuts compared to the cash oil&GAS SAYS Greta is hauling in by selling a book.
Greta's lifestyle is frugal. The low risk business of 'authoring' a book
at low cost would be an adequate source of money to cover her expenses
on travelling around to protest during the school year. Some day she may
want to move on to a high-pay job in the oil business.


 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,312
7,066
113
Greta's lifestyle is frugal. The low risk business of 'authoring' a book
at low cost would be an adequate source of money to cover her expenses
on travelling around to protest during the school year. Some day she may
want to move on to a high-pay job in the oil business.



 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts