What The Heck Is Kamala Trying To Say Here Exactly?

[mitchell76]

They dug their own grave. America in general is moderate. They are neither alt-right nor woke left. They used the right wing rage over a black man's presidency for 8 years to win in 2016, but the 4 following years showed their leader up in a very unfavourable light. Those 4 years also changed the republican party into a more extreme right wing party full of nut jobs, that cant put up a decent moderate candidate practicable enough to be elected.

Trump was pretty close to beating Biden in 2020. If Biden doesn't run again in 2024, then the Dems will be in trouble.

How close was Trump to winning the election?

Just before the 2020 US Presidential election, we asked the question ‘could Trump win the Presidency and lose the popular vote again’? Now that results from every state have been cer

www.electoral-reform.org.uk

 

[krealtarron]

Trump was pretty close to beating Biden in 2020. If Biden doesn't run again in 2024, then the Dems will be in trouble.

How close was Trump to winning the election?

Just before the 2020 US Presidential election, we asked the question ‘could Trump win the Presidency and lose the popular vote again’? Now that results from every state have been cer

www.electoral-reform.org.uk

Most presidential elections are close.

 

[krealtarron]

Im not particularly into these politics but i listened to the 45seconds and it makes sense.

What i understood:

Their team is working on defining new metrics that will help them analyze their performance in real time as opposed waiting— perhaps a long time —this maybe a problem for policy decisions, in the sense that if they can't analyze their performance in a timely manner the decisions they make based on previous performance might not be relevant by the time they make that decision.

Obviously there's no context as to what the performance is or what metrics they are measuring that would help them analyze the said performance

Perhaps the word "metrics" is throwing people off?

Political partisanship is throwing them off. They dont want to see the sense in what she is saying, they simply want to call her incompetent.

 

[squeezer]

Yeah she is a diversity and inclusion hire because she is black. She absolutely has no qualifications whatsoever to be a white house press secretary. Her race is the SOLE reason why she got the job.

They should have instead hired a more qualified candidate, who would naturally be white and male, like Sean Spicer. He would have adeptly dodged the question like only a qualified white guy can and hid in the bushes instead.

Don't forget nasty frumpy Sarah Huckabee or lying Kayleigh McEnany. The lady versions of Dumb and Dumber. LMAO

 

[The Oracle]

Yeah she is a diversity and inclusion hire because she is black. She absolutely has no qualifications whatsoever to be a white house press secretary. Her race is the SOLE reason why she got the job.

Well she's gay as well. She checks a lot of boxes for them. So there's that.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1623034283559424032

Jen was better....What stories do you figure Biden could tell? How about the Corn Pop tale. That was a good one.

 

[The Oracle]

Don't forget nasty frumpy Sarah Huckabee or lying Kayleigh McEnany. The lady versions of Dumb and Dumber. LMAO

That's governor Huckabee to you,lol.

 

[squeezer]

That's governor Huckabee to you,lol.

My apologies, let the record state MS. Nasty Grumpy Governor Sarah Huckabee

 

[mitchell76]

Well she's gay as well. She checks a lot of boxes for them. So there's that.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1623034283559424032

Jen was better....What stories do you figure Biden could tell? How about the Corn Pop tale. That was a good one.

 

[TittyChaser]

Funny whenever you read any lefty comments on here you guys are always insulting and disrespectful, same as here in Canada with the libs all just pretend to be kind and empathetic but you are all wolves in sheep’s clothing pretending to be kind but you are all no better than someone with hard right racial and discriminatory views . But hey as long as you all pretend to support the LGBTQ and people of colour
Jokes

 

[The Oracle]

Funny whenever you read any lefty comments on here you guys are always insulting and disrespectful, same as here in Canada with the libs all just pretend to be kind and empathetic but you are all wolves in sheep’s clothing pretending to be kind but you are all no better than someone with hard right racial and discriminatory views . But hey as long as you all pretend to support the LGBTQ and people of colour
Jokes

They're actually quite triggered in here. That's fairly obvious. When the hive gets a buzzing it's quite a sight.

 

[richaceg]

Nest case for the repugs is if Trump stops aside and endorse DeSantis but we all know he'd let a train on Melania before endorsing DeSantis

 

[toguy5252]

They're actually quite triggered in here. That's fairly obvious. When the hive gets a buzzing it's quite a sight.

Yea it's funny how the lefties are always insulting because calling someone a wolf in sheep's clothing is a compliment.

 

[krealtarron]

They're actually quite triggered in here. That's fairly obvious. When the hive gets a buzzing it's quite a sight.

Says the guy that got triggered over a 45 second clip and started the thread in the first place.

What can I say, right wingers are not known for having any self awareness.

 

[JohnLarue]

Says the guy that got triggered over a 45 second clip and started the thread in the first place.

What can I say, right wingers are not known for having any self awareness.

and yet the left have zero recognition of how obnoxiously pretentious and self -righteous they are.

 

[krealtarron]

and yet the left have zero recognition of how obnoxiously pretentious and self -righteous they are.

Yup accuse someone of being self-righteous while being self-righteous. As I said, self awareness, not a strong suit for right wingers.

 

[Frankfooter]

This debate is going swimmingly.

Remember when you could discuss issues without having to choose one side and stick to it?
You could be anti-gun and pro police, you could support cuts to some services and increases to others, you could support some taxes but not others.
All independent of whether you were right or left?

 

[Valcazar]

Im not particularly into these politics but i listened to the 45seconds and it makes sense.

What i understood:

Their team is working on defining new metrics that will help them analyze their performance in real time as opposed waiting— perhaps a long time —this maybe a problem for policy decisions, in the sense that if they can't analyze their performance in a timely manner the decisions they make based on previous performance might not be relevant by the time they make that decision.

Obviously there's no context as to what the performance is or what metrics they are measuring that would help them analyze the said performance

Perhaps the word "metrics" is throwing people off?

Same here.
This seemed pretty clear an unremarkable.
Part of the work the group she is talking to has to do is define better realtime measures of the impact of the larger work they do.
Since it is just 45 seconds with no other context, it is a little unclear what that actually would be, but the clip isn't really weird or confusing.

 

[JohnLarue]

Yup accuse someone of being self-righteous while being self-righteous. As I said, self awareness, not a strong suit for right wingers.

wrong

the right do not want to control other peoples behavior's, dictate who gets a position/ benefit based on gender / color and the the right does not make a self -righteous claim on other peoples wealth

you do not have a clue how self-righteous the left is

 

[The Oracle]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1623340216403599361

Huh?........

 

[The Oracle]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1623709137258401797