You keep a avoiding the question. What is explicit about waiving a flag.
You keep a avoiding the question. What is explicit about waiving a flag.
It's the kind of thing that gets negotiated and renegotiated constantly.And when did we have this agreement on what and why is reasonable on this topic?
...
That is epic.
Just epic.
Because maybe some of those kids would like to know that their parents and family members are welcome?
"Hold me to it"?
OMG.
Look, if you are upset that I implied you were being a bigot, then address that.
Don't pretend you have any standing about the word queer.
Trans rights aren't complicated - the political history of why the movements are intertwined is.
No one is suggesting teaching something that level of political history to kids.
It's the kind of thing that gets negotiated and renegotiated constantly.
That's society.
What are everyone's responsibilities in these kinds of cases?
Not simple at all in the edge cases, because humans are complex entities.
Should minors have the right to sue if they feel they have been misdiagnosed a few years later and be awarded damages if actions taken show no improvement to them?
Its not a real agenda. You keep confusing awareness and tolerance with an active agenda to make people gay or trans.No what I'm suggesting is all agenda pushers need to back off the kids.
Diagnosed with what?Should minors have the right to sue if they feel they have been misdiagnosed a few years later and be awarded damages if actions taken show no improvement to them?
LoL. I understand what explicit means. What is being taught explicitly waiving a rainbow flag.Explicit - stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.
I'm not avoiding the question. The answer is right there.
Anyone who has received medical care has the right to sue for medical malpractice.Should minors have the right to sue if they feel they have been misdiagnosed a few years later and be awarded damages if actions taken show no improvement to them?
Then diagnosed with what?No. Not gay.
Subject to certain procedural requirements everyone includuing minors has the right to sue for medical malpractice or negligence. How is that even an issue?Should minors have the right to sue if they feel they have been misdiagnosed a few years later and be awarded damages if actions taken show no improvement to them?
You only answered half the question.Anyone who has received medical care has the right to sue for medical malpractice.
You only answered half the question.Subject to certain procedural requirements everyone includuing minors has the right to sue for medical malpractice or negligence. How is that even an issue?
What does it say in the thread title?Then diagnosed with what?
If you're still triggered by this fake scandal, I suggest you join MTG in her protests.
Looks like she could use the help.
Marjorie Taylor Greene held an anti-trans rally at the Capitol & almost no one came - LGBTQ Nation
A whopping 12 or so people attended.www.lgbtqnation.com
I answered this. You understand what it means but you wont accept the term.LoL. I understand what explicit means. What is being taught explicitly waiving a rainbow flag.
Of cousre they should be able to collect damages but the test for damages is not simply that actions do not result in improvement. It is more complicated then that.You only answered half the question.
And should they be awarded damages if actions taken show no improvement to them?
It's a vague, self-serving question and you don't understand negligence law.You only answered half the question.
And should they be awarded damages if actions taken show no improvement to them?
LOL. Do you really think my confusion is about the definition of explicit. What does waiving a flag denote. What is the explicit message in waiving a rainbow flag. This is my last try at getting an answer.I answered this. You understand what it means but you wont accept the term.
Nothing that implies a medical diagnosis.What does it say in the thread title?
It's vague and self-service if a 14yo removes her breast and at 18yo she expresses regret and wants legal recourse?It's a vague, self-serving question and you don't understand negligence law.
If the professional services provided fall below accepted professional standards of care, the person who receives the services is entitled to sue for negligence. Regardless of the discipline that the service provider is in.
You're going to say that I am ducking the question; but you don't understand what the question means.