Flags have meaning.What is explicit about waiving a flag. Not you must go really crazy on Canada Day.
Sometime I go crazy on Canada day, because the agenda never takes a day off.

Flags have meaning.What is explicit about waiving a flag. Not you must go really crazy on Canada Day.
No what I'm suggesting is all agenda pushers need to back off the kids.Are you seriously suggesting that grooming kids with guns at a young age won't influence them but waving a rainbow flag will?
There is a difference between meaning and explicit. What is explicit about a kid waiving a rainbow flag.Flags have meaning.
Sometime I go crazy on Canada day, because the agenda never takes a day off.
![]()
It's explicitly sending a clear message saying we got in the schools now. First contact complete.There is a difference between meaning and explicit. What is explicit about a kid waiving a rainbow flag.
You keep a avoiding the question. What is explicit about waiving a flag.It's explicitly sending a clear message saying we got in the schools now. First contact complete.
Letting the people know, we're here.
Explicit - stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.You keep a avoiding the question. What is explicit about waiving a flag.
I'm not avoiding the question. The answer is right there.It's explicitly sending a clear message saying we got in the schools now. First contact complete.
Letting the people know, we're here.
Yup.You're lying. This is what you wrote:
It wasn't about any objections to anything, it's about what you "feel is a more accurate representation", and that you "doubt" what he meant.
No. It's ok to mock the rampant paranoia and desperate flailing of some people here.And Btw, that laughing emoji you left for that video of the little girl rubbing the genital area of that adult drag queen is very telling. It's ok to celebrate this depravity isn't it, sexualizing little children like that.
This is bordering on mental illness.
You all decided to frame this as "obviously the parent is great and has a wonderful relationship with the child which is being contaminated by the evil Trans agenda as that social worker groomed and tricked the child" despite having no evidence to go on.You are making shit up. You don't even have children, I would bet my life, a parent would never say something so absurd.
You have less than zero understanding about parent/child dynamics.
...There's nothing secret about this. They even have their own flag. They're not even a country.![]()
Which is, it seems, the "agenda" he is so horrified is "right in your face".All it says is gay people are welcome.
and that's exactly my point. This flag represents something. We know it's not a country, so what does it represent?
It represents the agenda being pushed on people. It's right in your face.
Because maybe some of those kids would like to know that their parents and family members are welcome?To a group of children looking like they are in the 1st grade?
Why would they need to let gay people know they are welcome?
The idiocy of that post is really quite astounding.
Not entirely.And still you can not state what policy or law. You tried the 14th amendment but failed and now you dropped the broke the law claims.
"Hold me to it"?Listen, I won't hold you to it, but it was very distasteful.
Trans rights aren't complicated - the political history of why the movements are intertwined is.Gay/Lesbian people are not confused about their gender. It's very clear to them M/M or F/F.
If it is all extremely complicated then why push the agenda to kids?
You keep a avoiding the question. What is explicit about waiving a flag.
It's the kind of thing that gets negotiated and renegotiated constantly.And when did we have this agreement on what and why is reasonable on this topic?
...
That is epic.
Just epic.
Because maybe some of those kids would like to know that their parents and family members are welcome?
"Hold me to it"?
OMG.
Look, if you are upset that I implied you were being a bigot, then address that.
Don't pretend you have any standing about the word queer.
Trans rights aren't complicated - the political history of why the movements are intertwined is.
No one is suggesting teaching something that level of political history to kids.
It's the kind of thing that gets negotiated and renegotiated constantly.
That's society.
What are everyone's responsibilities in these kinds of cases?
Not simple at all in the edge cases, because humans are complex entities.
Should minors have the right to sue if they feel they have been misdiagnosed a few years later and be awarded damages if actions taken show no improvement to them?
Its not a real agenda. You keep confusing awareness and tolerance with an active agenda to make people gay or trans.No what I'm suggesting is all agenda pushers need to back off the kids.