Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class
- Thread starter curr3n_c1000
- Start date
Well then that is a commentary on you. All I see is kids with rainbow flags. And what do you think they are being brainwashed about? Do you think there teacher is trying to "turn them gay"
The chances of a counsellor making those decisions are only slightly above zero.
At worst the counsellor enabled a kid to help deal with choices they had already made, which is not grooming.
Grooming implies that the kid was straight and the counsellor turned them trans in a series of meetings, which is utterly ridiculous.
Phil, what if those flags were Canadian flags?Yes it is. We're talking about 6-year old kids
Wouldn't those emblems also represent a set of abstract values? And wouldn't carrying them also be "grooming"?
Everything you learn in school - assuming you learned anything, I guess - is "grooming" because all schools inculcate a value system. The question is whether you like the values inculcated. If you went to a Madrassa in Saudi, you would probably be pissed off. But the civic values section of Canadian primary education is also arbitrary.
Phil, when did you start jerking off?
Bet it was when you were under 16 years old.
But you have no problem with kids holding MAGA hats and guns, do you?If those kids were holding MAGA hats instead of rainbow flags woke comrades would be screening that the kids are being manipulated.
That kind of grooming is ok for you?
Do you think kids younger than 16 don't masturbate, talk or have sex with each other?
Its not only kids, there are lots of people who are getting 'groomed' by incel top g types.
Sorry but "visible nipples" does not mean what you claim it means.Here you go: https://www.hdsb.ca/our-board/Policy/SchoolDressCode.pdf
Next time at least take a few seconds out of your day to google these things
Right, they shouldn't be indoctrinated into thinking that social gender roles and heterosexual relationships are the only option. That's why kids are being taught in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Where? What case are you talking about where counselled into making life altering decisions? The OP case is a kid being advised to wear a shape concealing clothing instead of suggesting surgery.
Amazing how you keep avoiding what our laws actually say. Kids can legally make decisions about their physical and mental wellbeing as long as the profession believes them capable of understanding the choice.
According to Halton's policy he/she does have that right. Parents don't have the right to complain because they don't like it. If they don't like it they can lobby their trustee and get the rules changed, you know, democracy.
Again, you obviously don't understand what their job entails.
I don't understand why schools are bombarding kids with propaganda that women can have jobs and minorities can vote!
What do kids holding flags have to do with my post and why do you find kids holding flags creepy?Yes it is. We're talking about 6-year old kids
Yes, that is the point of Rufo trying to reframe what "grooming" means.
If you actually thought his reframe was sincere, then really anything that teaches anything to children is "grooming".
If anything involves any values or concepts, then it is "grooming".
But the point, of course, is to conflate "any teaching of children" with "sexual abuse of children" and then have that muddled in people's minds so that anything someone dislikes ("you're teaching them values I don't want them taught") can be called "grooming" with all those nastier implications.
They chose "grooming" specifically so that it hits that "this is a sexual danger to your child". If they didn't want that extra kick, they would have stuck with "indoctrination".
When the usual Libs on this forum claim 6-year olds are masturbating, should receive sex-ed and should be allowed access to birth control, you know we have entered the Liberal bizarro world.
CREEPY!!
CREEPY!!
