The real reason for abortions

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,956
2,889
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
it's not about women's rights




Fetal Cells in the Cosmetics, Food, and Medical Industries




https://www.rehumanizeintl.org/cart-1




https://www.rehumanizeintl.org/






    • Nov 14, 2020

    • 6 min read

Fetal Cells in the Cosmetics, Food, and Medical Industries

by Stephanie Hauer







Editor's note: The author has written a sequel to this article in 2021, in response to questions about the COVID-19 vaccines and their connection to fetal cell lines. Click here to read her piece "On the Moral Implications of Vaccination."







Think about the items in your house for a moment. Do you have coffee creamer in the fridge? Mouthwash or anti-aging cream on the bathroom counter? Spices in your kitchen cabinet? How about a bandage on your arm from a recent vaccine, or prescription drugs? If you answered yes to any of these questions, there’s a chance that you have a product that was made using human fetal cells. While it’s not a universal practice, certain brands in the cosmetics, food, and medical industries use fetal cells for a variety of purposes, from testing and production to inclusion in the final product.



Fetal cells have been used for research since the 1930s. In order to obtain these cells, an aborted fetus is collected after their death, usually by a biotechnology company, university, or medical center. A tissue donation is removed, and the sample is brought to a lab, where the cells are replicated extensively. These cell lines are given an alphanumeric name. For example, the line known as WI-38 was created from the lung tissue of a three-month-old female fetus aborted in 1962. MRC-5 comes from the lung tissue of a fourteen-week-old male fetus aborted in Great Britain in 1970. The replication process is extremely prolific — meaning that a single sample can be used for many experiments and procedures. However, there are limitations; the samples degrade or exhaust over time. The stocks of cell lines must be replenished periodically. For example, in 2015 a new lung sample was taken from a three-month-old aborted fetus to create a cell line known as WALVAX-2.



These cells have a number of applications. Researchers discovered that the cell line derived from the skin of a fourteen-week-old male fetus aborted in Switzerland had restorative properties for skin. Originally, it was used to treat ulcers, burns, and scars. Eventually the skincare brand Neocutis realized that the same properties that healed injured skin could be used to rejuvenate wrinkled skin. They incorporate cells from that fetal line as a proprietary ingredient in some of their anti-aging products.



In the food and beverage industry, biotech company Senomyx uses the cell line HEK-293 for research and development of new flavor additives. To be clear, they are not adding fetal cells into food or beverages. Rather, they use the flavor receptors in the kidney cells of a female fetus aborted in the 1970s as tireless taste testers. This allows Senomyx to efficiently test new formulations of flavor or scent additives, to produce the most flavor with the least amount of sugar and salt. Companies that have developed products with Senomyx include Ajinomoto, Nestle, and Firmenich. Other companies — such as Kraft, Solae, Campbell Soup, and Pepsi — have changed or cancelled their contracts with Senomyx to ensure that no fetal cells were used to develop their products.



Fetal cell lines are used most extensively in the medical industry, in testing, production, and treatment. Fetal cells have been used to test treatments for some degenerative conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease. Human fetal cells are also used to grow the viruses that are used in certain vaccines, since viruses cannot easily be replicated without a cell to host them. The vaccines for chicken pox, rubella, and shingles are examples of vaccines that use fetal cells in their production process. Not all vaccines are produced in this way, and there are some ethical alternatives that don’t use these cell lines in their creation. Some prescription medications, such as Enbrel and Pulmozyme, actually contain fetal cells as an ingredient. The implantation of fetal cells into the body, similar to the process of transplanting an organ, is being explored as a potential cure for ailments such as retinitis pigmentosa.



Despite this type of work going on for decades, not many people know about it. The use of fetal tissue came into the spotlight in recent years when the controversial videos by the Center for Medical Progress — which revealed Planned Parenthood executives discussing the procurement and sale of fetal tissue — were released. But the attention brought to this practice by the videos was still not enough to make it a well-known issue; this is partly due to the fact that the range of its use is not clearly advertised. For example, the FDA does not always require cosmetics companies to include a list of their ingredients, though Neocutis freely admits to their use of fetal cells. Similarly, when the flavor enhancers developed by Senomyx are added to foods, they are in a low enough concentration that they can be labelled as “artificial flavors.” This means that consumers cannot easily trace which foods include those additives. Vaccines manufacturers provide a list of their ingredients, but not all patients read through the ingredient list before getting a shot — and when these ingredients are listed, the cell lines are referred to by their alphanumeric name. If you don’t know what you’re looking for, you might never realize exactly what it means.



There are some regulations surrounding the collection of fetal tissue. For example, a pregnant person can only be asked if they wish to donate blood or tissue from their abortion after they have requested the procedure. Under the Uniform Anatomic Gift Act, it is a federal crime to buy or sell fetal tissue; however, companies and organizations are allowed to collect reasonable fees that cover the costs of handling and processing the tissue. Since there are no hard limits that define what “reasonable” looks like in these instances, it can be difficult to enforce. Additionally, there are no regulations that determine exactly how the tissue can be used. Someone may choose to donate the body of their aborted fetus thinking that their cells will be used for developing medicines, but the sample could end up in the cosmetics or food industry.



There are alternatives — some of which are being tested right now, and some of which are already in use. The viruses for vaccines can be grown in animal cells, for example. In fact, growing viruses in monkey or chicken egg cells used to be common practice; the switch to human fetal cells occurred to try and reduce the risk of transmitting animal diseases into humans, and to ensure the most precise immune response in the human body. Umbilical cord blood and postnatal placentas are being evaluated for their efficacy in replacing fetal cells for research purposes. And stem cells donated by adults, which are obtained nonviolently, are considered “the gold standard” for stem cell research. They’re being used to study diseases such as Alzheimer’s. Unfortunately, we have not yet discovered an alternative that would be able to totally replace fetal cells in all forms of research.



One sample of a cell strain does stretch very far — and recent advancements may stretch them ever further — but new samples are still required periodically, and will be required all the more frequently if we expand the use of fetal cells further. To continue the use of fetal cells in research is to perpetuate the need for acts of violence to provide those cells.


Fetal Cells in the Cosmetics, Food, and Medical Industries (rehumanizeintl.org)

How much is the fetal tissue industry driving the abortion debate?



The following is a news analysis

  • Those who utilize fetal tissue and cells for commercial purposes include pharmaceutical companies and government agencies
  • Fetal tissue has been used for vaccine development since the 1930s (CNN)
  • Taxpayer money has long funded research using aborted fetal tissue (Scientific American)
  • In 2000, one company listed the price it would pay for a fetal brain as $999 (ABC News 20/20)
According to many polls, Americans remain firmly divided on the questions surrounding abortion.

Is abortion a Constitutional right? Or a matter left up to the states?

Should abortion be outlawed entirely? Only after a certain point? Or not at all?

There's another question that's been raised in the past, but is seemingly not discussed as much today.

Those in media and politics who advocate for abortion (or as few of restrictions as possible) often use similar language and tactics as pharmaceutical industry interests used during Covid and related vaccine-related issues. So how much of the current abortion discussion is driven by the pharmaceutical industry and others -- such as government research institutions -- who have a commercial interest in purchasing and/or using aborted fetuses and fetal tissue?

The fetal tissue industry and alleged abuses were examined in an investigative report by ABC News 20/20 and Chris Wallace in 2000. That story is not easily found online today, but you can read a news release about the report at the end of this post.

You can read more at the links following the excerpts and quotes below.

...the price list for one company, Opening Lines, includes listings of $325 for a spinal cord, $550 for a reproductive organ, $999 for a brain.
ABC News 20/20, March 8, 2000
...fetal tissue research is legal, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been funding it for decades.
Scientific American, Dec. 9, 2015
Fetal tissue has been used since the 1930s for vaccine development... Researchers typically take tissue samples from a fetus that has been aborted...Many of the uses of fetal tissue – and much of the debate – are not new. 'It’s just that the public is finding out about it,' said Insoo Hyun, associate professor of bioethics at Case Western Reserve University...the ways that fetal tissue are allowed to be obtained and used are not new either, Hyun said. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released guidelines on the topic in the 1990s.
CNN, July 17, 2015
The following is the text of a press release issued on Monday, March 6, 2000, by ABC News 20/20 in New York.

ABC NEWS "20/20" INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGED TRAFFICKING IN FETAL TISSUE FINDS COMPANIES THAT APPEAR TO BE PROFITING FROM SELLING HUMAN TISSUE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH

A three-month "20/20" hidden-camera investigation has uncovered an industry in which tissue and organs from aborted fetuses, donated to help medical research, are being marketed for hundreds, sometimes thousands, of dollars.

How much is the fetal tissue industry driving the abortion debate? | Sharyl Attkisson
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
7,255
5,015
113
In all seriousness though what does the GOP think is going to happen to nearly 1 million unwanted babies every year? They will be found in dumpsters behind local dennies or hopefully left at church like a hot potatoes. How can these fools not see this epidemic coming ? 1 million orphans every year will be looked after how ? If you think illegal immigration is a problem just wait till these little bastards grow up and buy lots and lots of guns to exact their revenge on a society that only wanted them to be born and not after.
 
Last edited:

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,559
9,310
113
In all seriousness though what does the GOP think is going to happen to nearly 1 million unwanted babies every year? They will be found in dumpsters behind local dennies or hopefully left at church like a hot potatoes. How can these fools not see this epidemic coming ? 1 million orphans every year will be looked after how ? If you think illegal immigration is a problem just wait till these little bastards grow up and buy lots and lots of guns to exact their revenge on a society that only wanted them to be born and not after.
I think gop has trust that poor and docile will remain poor and docile and will be giving birth to poor and docile
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,956
2,889
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
University Faces Investigation for Illegally Doing Research With Aborted Baby Parts



A university that has been one of the biggest culprits of conducting dubious research with aborted baby parts is now under federal investigation.

Two years ago, documents obtained from the federal government suggest that aborted babies may be being born alive and left to die at the University of Pittsburgh so that their organs may be used for scientific research.

The University of Pittsburgh is the same place where researchers implanted second-trimester aborted babies’ scalps onto rodents to study the human immune system.

In 2021, Judicial Watch and the Center for Medical Progress said they obtained 252 pages of new documents about the university’s practices from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS provided the documents after the groups filed a Freedom of Information Act request and later a lawsuit when the agency did not follow through.

The documents show that the federal government gave the University of Pittsburgh at least $2.7 million in federal tax dollars over the past five years to become a “tissue hub” for aborted baby body parts for scientific research.


Now, Pitt is under federal investigation by HHS.

New emails show university officials confirming in November 2021 that they had been subpoenaed by the HHS Office of Inspector General agent.

“The University of Pittsburgh has been a center for some of the most barbaric experiments, government funded experiments, on the body parts of late-term aborted babies,” CMP President David Daleiden told The Daily Wire. “We now have the first confirmation with these FOIA documents that this is all subject of a formal federal law enforcement investigation of the OIG [Office of Inspector General].”

According to the emails, Pitt’s Senior Vice Chancellor for Research Dr. Rob Rutenba acknowledged the existence of a federal probe into the school in response to an email from NIH Deputy Director for Extramural Research Dr. Michael Lauer requesting information on the fetal tissue projects at the university.
“With regard to your request for documentation/information, please be aware that we received a subpoena from HHS OIG requesting similar documentation on October 28, 2021,” Rutenba wrote on Friday, November 2021. “We are happy to provide the requested information to both you and the HHS OIG, however, [redacted] instructed us not to provide the documentation you have requested information until he has had the opportunity to speak with you.”
The status of the HHS OIG investigation is not known. “We don’t know the results of the OIG investigation yet. We don’t know if the OIG has further referred that investigation to the FBI or the Department of Justice. The University of Pittsburgh has been completely in damage control mode,” Daleiden said.
Agents with the HHS OIG have the ability to make arrests, conduct surveillance, serve search warrants, and seize evidence. The HHS OIG office told The Daily Wire that they could “neither confirm nor deny the existence of any investigation, should there be any.”
David Daleiden, founder and president of the Center for Medical Progress, has previously said evidence in the documents suggests late-term aborted babies may be being delivered alive before their organs are harvested.

“Infants in the womb, some old enough to be viable, are being aborted alive and killed for organ harvesting, in order to bring in millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for Pitt and the Planned Parenthood abortion business it supports,” Daleiden said. “Law enforcement and public officials should act immediately to bring the next Kermit Gosnell to justice under the law.”

Gosnell was a Philadelphia abortionist who was convicted of conducting late-term abortions where babies were born alive before he killed them. He is serving life in prison.

In the documents, the University of Pittsburgh mentions “labor induction” as a “procedure that will be used to obtain the tissue,” according to the Center for Medical Progress.

Labor induction abortions are basically what they sound like; the abortionist typically injects digoxin or another poison into the unborn baby’s heart to kill him/her and then induces labor so that the mother gives birth to her dead baby’s body. This method is used in later second- and third-trimester abortions.

If digoxin is not used – and the Center for Medical Progress found that scientists want “fetal tissue” without digoxin because the poison interferes with their research, there is a chance of the baby being born alive. Research indicates up to 50 percent of labor-induction abortions without digoxin can result in an infant born alive.

The Center for Medical Progress and Judicial Watch also noted that the University of Pittsburgh boasted about offering “rapid access to very high quality tissue,” including the freshness of the aborted babies’ body parts.

In the documents:

Pitt states that it records the “warm ischemic time on our samples and take steps to keep it at a minimum to ensure the highest quality biological specimens.” [The “warm ischemic time” refers to the amount of time an organ remains at body temperature after blood supply has been cut off. Warm ischemic time differs from cold ischemic time which refers to the amount of time the organ is chilled. Pitt’s statement suggests the time between the abortion and collection is minimal.]
The university also told the federal government in 2015 that it has been “collecting fetal tissue for over 10 years … includ[ing] liver, heart, gonads, legs, brain, genitourinary tissues including kidneys, ureters and bladders.”

“The collections can be significantly ramped up as material could have been accrued from as many as 725 cases last year,” the university stated in the documents.

It asked the federal government for grant money to “develop a pipeline to the acquisition, quality control and distribution of human” urinary and genital organs with the goal of “a minimum of 5 cases” each week, according to the documents.

The university’s proposal also included racial targets, Judicial Watch and the Center for Medical Progress discovered.

“Of its planned aborted ‘subjects’ Pitt desired 50% to be minority fetuses. The proposal suggests that the ‘subjects’ be diverse because Pittsburgh is diverse, the U.S. Census Bureau shows the city of Pittsburgh is close to 70% white,” according to Judicial Watch.

And the university has been using Americans’ tax dollars to pay for this. According to the documents, the University of Pittsburgh requested $3.2 million over a five-year period in 2015, and it has received at least $2.7 million so far.

One of the experiments that may have been funded with that money involved scalping five-month aborted babies and then implanting their scalps onto rodents.

The information comes from a study that University of Pittsburgh researchers published in September 2020 in the journal “Scientific Reports.” It describes how scientists used scalps from aborted babies to create “humanized” mice and rats to study the human immune system.

Along with the study, the researchers published photos of their experiment – horrific images that show tufts of babies’ hair growing on the rodents.

University Faces Investigation for Illegally Doing Research With Aborted Baby Parts - LifeNews.com
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,441
113
Lewiston, NY
Cannibalism's
I think gop has trust that poor and docile will remain poor and docile and will be giving birth to poor and docile
I think gop has trust that poor and docile will remain poor and docile and will be giving birth to poor and docile
coming back, though a lot of us won't be around by the time they have cooking shows...
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,956
2,889
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Moral Connections:: The Relationship between Abortion and Fetal Tissue Research*



Editor’s note: The connections among aborted fetal tissue, medical research, conscience, and the delivery of health care have been drawn into sharp focus in recent years because of vaccines that are prepared from cell lines derived from fetal tissue. To aid our readers in understanding the historical context of this problem and to assist them in addressing this issue with their patients, we reprint this article from 1994, along with the statement from the Pontifical Academy for Life regarding the use of aborted tissues in vaccine production.

The author’s most recent article, “AIDS and the FDA: An Ethical Case for Limiting Patient Access to Experimental Therapies,” appeared in the September 1992 issue of IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research.

Human fetal tissue holds much promise as a therapy for a number of intractable conditions.1 In animals, researchers have shown that the transplantation of fetal tissue into select regions of the brain can alleviate the symptoms of Parkinsonism. Moreover, scientists from both Sweden and Mexico have transplanted fetal neural tissue into the brains of patients with Parkinson’s disease. These efforts have not only ameliorated the signs of the disease but also appear to slow its progression. Experts in this field further believe that a number of other disorders will respond to human fetal transplants. Likely candidates for fetal tissue therapy include: DiGeorge’s syndrome, diabetes mellitus, Huntington’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. No cure exists for any of these diseases and none, other than fetal tissue therapy, appear on the horizon.

In light of these facts, many scientists have pushed ahead with research in this field. Individuals in both the lay and professional communities, however, have raised a number of ethical concems.2 Their objections focus on the link between the therapy and the source of the fetal tissue—elective abortions. Since material from spontaneous abortions likely contains fetal pathology, such tissue is medically unacceptable for transplantation. Thus, material salvaged from induced abortions primarily serves as the only source for fetal tissue. Opponents of fetal tissue transplantation research assert that one cannot weigh the ethical questions involved in this issue without evaluating the moral status of induced abortion. Proponents of this endeavor, though, state that fetal tissue experimentation and abortion are “morally separate.” For example, John Robertson writes that “One’s views on abortion need not determine one’s answer to this question, because the abortion and the subsequent transplant are clearly separate.”3 Moreover, they point to the recommendations of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Panel. Advocates of fetal tissue research claim that the guidelines for fetal transplantation proposed by this commission ensure that efforts to utilize fetal tissue as therapy will remain separate from the issue of abortion. An examination of the impact fetal tissue investigations will have on the rate of abortions, of ethical questions regarding consent, and of issues of complicity, though, reveals that in order to determine the ethics of fetal tissue research, one must examine the moral status of abortion.

Moral Connections:: The Relationship between Abortion and Fetal Tissue Research* - PMC (nih.gov)


Scientists say fetal tissue remains essential for vaccines and developing treatments
Health Aug 11, 2015 11:35 AM EST
BOSTON — The furor on Capitol Hill over Planned Parenthood has stoked a debate about the use of tissue from aborted fetuses in medical research, but U.S. scientists have been using such cells for decades to develop vaccines and seek treatments for a host of ailments, from vision loss and neurological disorders to cancer and AIDS.
Anti-abortion activists set off the uproar by releasing undercover videos of Planned Parenthood officials that raised questions of whether the organization was profiting from the sale of fetal tissue. Planned Parenthood has denied making any profit and said it charges fees solely to cover its costs.
University laboratories that buy such cells strongly defend their research, saying tissue that would otherwise be thrown out has played a vital role in lifesaving medical advances and holds great potential for further breakthroughs.
Fetal cells are considered ideal because they divide rapidly, adapt to new environments easily and are less susceptible to rejection than adult cells when transplanted.
“If researchers are unable to work with fetal tissue, there is a huge list of diseases for which researchers would move much more slowly, rather than quickly, to find their cause and how they can be cured,” Stanford University spokeswoman Lisa Lapin said in an email.


Scientists say fetal tissue remains essential for vaccines and developing treatments | PBS NewsHour





By Denise Grady and Nicholas St. Fleur
  • July 27, 2015
Videos released by an anti-abortion group during the last two weeks have drawn attention to a little-known practice: the buying, selling and research use of fetal tissue acquired from abortion clinics.
The group behind the tapes accuses Planned Parenthood of selling fetal tissue for profit — which is illegal and which Planned Parenthood denies doing. House Republicans plan to investigate. This may be just one more battle in the nation’s long war over abortion, but the dispute has raised questions about who the buyers and sellers are, what fetal tissue is used for and what the law allows.


Fetal Tissue From Abortions for Research Is Traded in a Gray Zone - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
 
Toronto Escorts