Biden to unveil administration's plan to spend $37 billion to reduce gun crime

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,880
3,465
113
Why?
When Crime was low, they increased the budget, and crime went up.
So logically, increasing the police budget increases crime.
applying the the same failed logic would determine an increase in shark bites must be caused by higher ice cream sales

spurious correlation does not translate to cause and effect
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
33,117
61,919
113
Would the SC rule on Newson's gun law but not the Texas abortion law that offers the same bounty?
Sure.
The court is outcome based.
They don't want the gun law, they did want the Texas law.
So one gets ruled unconstitutional and the other doesn't. (They actually just didn't bother to rule on the Texas law, really, they just let it stand.)
They aren't even trying to pretend to be consistent. They have the votes.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
33,117
61,919
113
applying the the same failed logic would determine an increase in shark bites must be caused by higher ice cream sales

spurious correlation does not translate to cause and effect
Yes.
Indeed.
That's why I make fun of it.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,880
3,465
113
Yes.
Indeed.
That's why I make fun of it.

your laughing all by yourself in your own little world as the humor is lost if the reader is left guessing whether your are being sarcastic or just a damn fool
believe me there are lots of loonies who would have drawn that spurious conclusion and defended it as fact , simply because it fits their narrative
how are we expected to differentiate you from them?

learn how to communicate clearly
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
33,117
61,919
113
your laughing all by yourself in your own little world as the humor is lost if the reader is left guessing whether your are being sarcastic or just a damn fool
believe me there are lots of loonies who would have drawn that spurious conclusion and defended it as fact , simply because it fits their narrative
how are we expected to differentiate you from them?

learn how to communicate clearly
I communicate very clearly.
That you have trouble understanding things in general isn't really my problem.
And yes, lots of people constantly draw spurious conclusions about such things.
You see it all the time in threads all across the board.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,880
3,465
113
]I communicate very clearly.
obviously not if you have to make a subsequent clarifying post

That you have trouble understanding things in general isn't really my problem.
The objective of communicating is to get your message understood by the reader
The objective of communicating is not to have the reader guessing at what you message is

i.e. whether you are being sarcastic or just a damn fool


And yes, lots of people constantly draw spurious conclusions about such things.
You see it all the time in threads all across the board.

All the more reason why you should have been more clear whether you were being sarcastic or just a damn fool
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
33,117
61,919
113
obviously not if you have to make a subsequent clarifying post

The objective of communicating is to get your message understood by the reader
The objective of communicating is not to have the reader guessing at what you message is

i.e. whether you are being sarcastic or just a damn fool
My objective in communicating is to convey the message that I find you ridiculous and don't take you seriously.
You seem to have understood that very well.
Therefore I am communicating quite clearly.

If you want me to use sarcasm tags or a sarcasm font so you can keep up with the conversation, I suppose I can indulge you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,880
3,465
113
My objective in communicating is to convey the message that I find you ridiculous and don't take you seriously.
You seem to have understood that very well.
Therefore I am communicating quite clearly.
Not if you need to explain your position with subsequent posts, as is the case here


BTW I find you arrogant and a nasty piece of work who likes to drop half hidden / unclear messages tied to an insult

If you want me to use sarcasm tags or a sarcasm font so you can keep up with the conversation, I suppose I can indulge you.
Or you could learn to communicate properly,
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,727
6,614
113
I communicate very clearly.
That you have trouble understanding things in general isn't really my problem.
And yes, lots of people constantly draw spurious conclusions about such things.
You see it all the time in threads all across the board.
and we're seeing it now....from you...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnLarue

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,605
23,417
113
Toronto Escorts