A lot of clients may not be in the position but I've always thought they should call the cops on rip-off SPs.
Giggidy.I agree with the thrust of the article that sex work should be treated more like other forms of employment.
Hmmmmm.
So what's interesting about this is a court will be asked to force a person to commit an illegal act by paying for sex.
Which could bring the whole thing tumbling down. At least that's how I read it.
If I understand it correctly the SP is in essence asking the court to enforce a verbal contract involving a criminal act. Which is something civil law normally won't do. However if she wins the court will have in fact ordered forced payment for an illegal act.Sorry I don't understand what you mean.
What are you trying to get at?
Good for her. I don’t know how she will do considering purchasing sex is illegal, but who knows, maybe she can fight hard enough and get that changed for all of us.
A client can’t do that because he is not allowed to be seeing an escort in the first place.A lot of clients may not be in the position but I've always thought they should call the cops on rip-off SPs.
If he gets robbed by an escort he can absolutely call the police…escorts don’t have immunity to rob people…and, you can see an escort.Good for her. I don’t know how she will do considering purchasing sex is illegal, but who knows, maybe she can fight hard enough and get that changed for all of us.
A client can’t do that because he is not allowed to be seeing an escort in the first place.
You can’t see an escort. It is illegal to purchase sex services. And don’t go on about buying time, we all know that is bullshit.If he gets robbed by an escort he can absolutely call the police…escorts don’t have immunity to rob people…and, you can see an escort.
Have to agree, he will dig a hole for himself. Will be difficult for him to explain what he was doing.But yes, I guess you right, he can press charges and open himself up for being arrested at the same time.
Kinda like falling on his "sword"?...You can’t see an escort. It is illegal to purchase sex services. And don’t go on about buying time, we all know that is bullshit.
But yes, I guess you right, he can press charges and open himself up for being arrested at the same time.
I am no expert, but I doubt small claims court could set precedent when it comes to...well...anything. I mean, don't they just have Justices of the Peace handle this? They don't even need to be lawyers...just 10 years of work or volunteer experience.If I understand it correctly the SP is in essence asking the court to enforce a verbal contract involving a criminal act. Which is something civil law normally won't do. However if she wins the court will have in fact ordered forced payment for an illegal act.
So does that mean it's no longer illegal? Or does it mean the verbal contract is not legally enforceable if she loses.
Either way big ramifications for the industry.
talk about a "Catch 22" situationYou can’t see an escort. It is illegal to purchase sex services. And don’t go on about buying time, we all know that is bullshit.
But yes, I guess you right, he can press charges and open himself up for being arrested at the same time.
You’re wrong…if I want to buy an hour of an escorts time, no crime has been committed…no one has said anything about sex being involved, consenting adults can have sex if it turns out that way.You can’t see an escort. It is illegal to purchase sex services. And don’t go on about buying time, we all know that is bullshit.
But yes, I guess you right, he can press charges and open himself up for being arrested at the same time.
Does he actually have to explain? Wouldn’t the onus of proof be on the SP?Have to agree, he will dig a hole for himself. Will be difficult for him to explain what he was doing.
You can try that in court but I bet your argument fails.You’re wrong…if I want to buy an hour of an escorts time, no crime has been committed…no one has said anything about sex being involved, consenting adults can have sex if it turns out that way.