The Ottawa GFE MAs (list, votes and reviews)

Previous Thread Next Thread
R

robotrabbit

Member
Mar 24, 2017
59
43
18
Hands95 said:
I like this rating a lot. Tells me exactly what I need to know. It is also a reminder to confirm with the lady exactly what is included in the 'all-inclusive' fee. 'All-inclusive' is not what it use to be :(
Click to expand...
I like it too.
I would have several +0.
It lets people know that I did see the girl and it was meh...
It means it was ok but will not book her again. I would not give +1 unless I am willing to pay again to see the lady.

Moonie is +0 when she was at CMJ.
Sophia -1 at CMJ
Willow +0 at Alpha
Faye +0 at CMJ
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: MaverickPunter, jqhobby, Hands95 and 3 others
M

medalllione

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2011
774
536
93
robotrabbit said:
I like it too.
I would have several +0.
It lets people know that I did see the girl and it was meh...
It means it was ok but will not book her again. I would not give +1 unless I am willing to pay again to see the lady.

Moonie is +0 when she was at CMJ.
Sophia -1 at CMJ
Willow +0 at Alpha
Faye +0 at CMJ
Click to expand...
The bar for "+1" just got raised. I am not so sure that is needed generally unless in a specific scenario (be your own lexicographer). Folks are allowed to pen a summary of their experince with an MA, as a rough guide.
 
raegae2000

raegae2000

Latin lover
Dec 7, 2018
90
105
33
+1 for Selena (Alpha)
+1 Peach CMJ

On a side note, does anyone know if massage girls get tested regularly even tho extras are considered a no no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snagglepuss
T

toine

Left-handed user
Jan 6, 2007
598
467
63
The outer fringe
robotrabbit said:
I like it too.
I would have several +0.
It lets people know that I did see the girl and it was meh...
It means it was ok but will not book her again. I would not give +1 unless I am willing to pay again to see the lady.

Moonie is +0 when she was at CMJ.
Sophia -1 at CMJ
Willow +0 at Alpha
Faye +0 at CMJ
Click to expand...
These +0 do sound a lot like a '+1, but meh for me/chemistry lacking'.
Once we free ourselves of the binary +1, -1, the possibilities are endless...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: YoNoText123 and haplessinquiry
S

shy_romantic_Romeo69

Active member
Feb 8, 2022
100
157
43
robotrabbit said:
I like it too.
I would have several +0.
It lets people know that I did see the girl and it was meh...
It means it was ok but will not book her again. I would not give +1 unless I am willing to pay again to see the lady.

Moonie is +0 when she was at CMJ.
Sophia -1 at CMJ
Willow +0 at Alpha
Faye +0 at CMJ
Click to expand...

I really like this idea of yours. Makes it way more realistic and have more options in 'measuring performance'.
 
M

mrclean

Active member
Aug 20, 2004
256
30
28
+0 for Sophia at CMJ - beautiful girl and meets the strict minimum of gfe as per the original definition of this thread. She did her job pleasantly but there was nothing more. Would not repeat.
 
D

DaveBoone

Member
Jul 13, 2014
64
16
8
Hi Guys... I'm a seasonal visitor to the area and stoked to see some of Ottawa's great MAs again this summer. I notice that the spreadsheet now asks me to sign in with a registered gmail account... is that correct or can I use the same Yahoo address that I use for the rest of my terb stuff? Thanks in advance... Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom