Kyle Rittenhouse solicits donations, so he can sue CNN and NYT
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
He had the legal right to shoot the guy and he did. And scared or not, his shooting was far from pathetic. Epic might be a more apt description.
You really do want to bring back the wild west, don't you?
Perhaps you'd just prefer a full on, failed state.
Then you'd be able to walk around with lots of guns and shoot whoever you want.
Scared right wingers like you really are the cause.
Assuming that the info on the victims' criminal records is accurate - because all of the information is illegally obtained, as criminal records are confidential and that means that it cannot be verified - most of it wasn't available when I last checked into the case around the time of the verdict.
And that's why I wrote "IIRC".... There's no rule that I have to meticulously research every post I write on this board. You sure as fuck don't.
Its also immaterial as to whether KR was justified in shooting anyone that day. He had no knowledge of any previous records. The only one of interest was whether the first person KR killed was mentally unstable, since he was released from a hospital that day and why KR didn't leave him alone like the ex-marine who was supposed to be leading the fake security guard gang. What should have been material, but was blocked by the judge, was KR threatening to use his AK weeks before the protest.
In Canada, KR would not have gotten away with self defence in court, would he?
In Canada we would be naming a street after the dead pedophile and giving millions to his family with Justin and Jag 1&2 speakers at his funeral.
Agree except Rittenhouse was going to shoot anyone until he was attacked unlike in Buffalo and Uvalde. Big difference.
Last edited:
You don't know that, in fact, looks like KR may have been looking for someone to shoot.
Kyle Rittenhouse was recorded weeks before the Kenosha shooting saying he wished he 'had my f---ing AR' to shoot at people leaving CVS, prosecutors say
Look, I don't wanna defend pedophiles, but the fact here is, it shouldn't matter what the victim's past was. Rittenhouse had no clue who this dude was. The right loves to pretend to be the side of law and order but you seem to be justifying extrajudicial killings. So little Kyle doesn't get a gold star because the person he gunned down after picking a fight wasn't an upstanding citizen.
Failed argument. I gave you how things work for self defense in the justice system. Of course, then there is Frankfrauder justice where someone is jailed for defending themself, if they happened to use self-defense shoot someone supporting a far left wing thug(like Antifa) but would be OK if they shot a far right wing thug(like the KKK).
Fraud.
Folks Mandrill is proving he is even more of a fraud than we have already seen. First he lied about the criminal records of the three people shot in Kenosha(and in the same post accusing me of being continuously wrong) and was outed for it by me. Now after a pathetic excuse of the criminal records being illegally obtained(I have my doubts but can't be sure), he lies that most of it was unavailable at the time of the verdict.
The verdict was on Nov 19, 2021. Here is a Snopes article from September 11, 2020 about the criminal records.
What’s True and False About People Kyle Rittenhouse Shot in Kenosha | Snopes.com
So now Mandrill is swearing in his replies and saying he doesn't do meticulous research before posting. I would say it is either outright lying or no research at all(ie. incompetent). Do not believe anything he says.
Yes Mandrill, I am having great fun helping to ensure people realize your credibility is being(or more likely has been) destroyed.
See how the frauds work. Frankfooter says that the records of the three person shot is immaterial, but yet he is making statements about some things that Rittenhouse had supposedly previously said.
That is how the frauds use double standards to only their benefit and it is the whole reason why I keep using this term to describe them. Rittenhouse threatened to use an AK in the past....Frankfooter seizes on it. The three attackers are all criminals convicted of violent crimes in the past....Frankfooter says 'please ignore'.
Frauds.
Czar....Right again.
Fraud? OK, let me break it down for you: The victim's past really has no bearing in the shooting. You know why? Two of them died and cannot defend themselves. Plus, Rittenhouse had no knowledge of any of their past misbehaviour. Now, what Rittenhouse might have done, like threaten someone with his rifle, speaks to what he was actually doing in Kenosha. Was he really there to act as a medic, like he claimed, or did he have anger issues and wanted to shoot people? That might have been something a jury might have heard. I mean, you do understand why that is different, right?
KR was a scared kid with a big gun who was frightened by some mentally unstable guy with a plastic bag so he shot him.
Scared right wingers should just stay in their basements.
You really want a world where scared teenagers are walking around with semi automatics knowing that they can shoot and claim they were scared later?
You want a world where everyone thinks they need to take guns to protests?
Kyle Rittenhouse was recorded weeks before the Kenosha shooting saying he wished he 'had my f---ing AR' to shoot at people leaving CVS, prosecutors say
Kenosha prosecutors say a new video provides "crucial insight" into Kyle Rittenhouse's vigilante state of mind in summer 2020.
www.insider.com
I agree that it is scary when someone threatens to rip your heart out and then after doing that lunges at you trying to get your gun. Notice folks how the frauds like Frankfrauder don't mention these things when they intentionally try to mislead you.
That is why they are frauds. And then they make silly grade 5 level statements that accompany their fraudulent statements.
Last edited:
I would say their past has a significant bearing. If these were people who had clean records and no violent past, when the frauds say that these three had only good intentions, one might be willing to believe. But when they are all violent criminals, it is much more likely at a place where riots were happening that these three had violent intentions.
Of course, the frauds would deny that.....unless of course, the roles were reversed and it was that Charlottesville protest. Then the frauds would completely change their argument for an exact same reversed situation of a gunman protecting property and they would say that the gunmen was totally justified in shooting a mentally ill guy with a plastic bag.
Because they are frauds.
And I expose them.
The kid had a gun and got scared by some mentally ill creep. He panicked and shot him.
Typical right winger.
That's why you guys shouldn't have guns, you get scared too easily.
KR, of course, had a history of violence himself, also not unlike right wingers.
I think you're exposing yourself more than fraud.
So, you think Rittenhouse traveling from his house in another state with a deadly weapon of war and pointing it at people was a good thing? Scared teenager who shouldn't have been there, doing something he wasn't asked to do.
As for Charlottesville....wtf are you talking about???? The only person killed there was Heather Heyer, who was hit by some right-wing white supremacist shit stain in a car. Nobody on the left shot anyone there. In fairness, nobody on the right shot anyone either...
The right wing: consistently inconsistent.
Rittenhouse was caught on camera violently attacking and punching a girl. He was 100% out there hoping to fulfill his sick fantasy of shooting some “ANTIFA/BLM” boogeymen
