Biden in a no-win Saudi oil bind

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,565
2,086
113
Ghawar
Daniel Williams
June 09, 2022

US President Joe Biden is trying to figure out how to placate Saudi Arabia’s de facto leader Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and get his country to produce more oil.


Biden, under domestic criticism for high inflation, needs to somehow lower the price of oil. Saudi Arabia has more on hand than anyone.


But getting Saudi help will be hard. Biden once called the kingdom a “pariah.” A US intelligence report effectively labeled Prince Mohammed a murderer for overseeing the 2018 killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Nonetheless, Biden’s spokesperson said it is the president’s duty to keep communications open. Never mind that Khashoggi, who wrote for the Washington Post, was murdered in a Saudi consulate in Turkey and that his killers chopped up his body into pieces for easy transport out.


Or that the Saudis oppose Biden’s efforts to cut a nuclear weapons deal with Iran.


“The president will meet with any leader if it serves the interests of the American people,” spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre said Tuesday. “That’s what he puts first.”

It’s a conundrum at the collision of two competing foreign policy desires: to be tough on Russia and tough on Saudi Arabia. The two goals have turned out to be incompatible. Each has stumbled over complications from using oil as a pressure tool.


There are two difficulties with Biden’s oil diplomacy. First, it’s far from certain that the Saudis and the other 12 members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) will want to increase supply or even can.

Saudi Arabia and petroleum powerhouse United Arab Emirates will not want to boost production by themselves. Doing so would effectively steal market share from their OPEC partners.


Moreover, several OPEC members, including Libya, Venezuela and Nigeria, cannot meet cartel quotas set months ago; their wells, equipment and refineries fell into disarray during the Covid crisis.


According to Argus, a commodities media company, OPEC is underperforming its quotas by more than 1 million barrels per day.


China, which has imposed no boycotts on its Russia trade, cannot ramp up purchases of Moscow’s oil. If it could, that would effectively rebalance the global market by freeing up oil it usually imports from elsewhere for sale to someone else. But, China lacks the pipeline capacity to increase purchases directly from Russia.


Finally, oil traders generally are skittish about financing Russian sales.

The Saudis recently bent a bit on production by getting OPEC to agree on slight increases. But experts say the gesture is not enough to reduce spiraling prices. “Unless the Russian petroleum supply shortfall can be contained, it appears necessary for the price of oil to increase substantially and to remain elevated for a long period,” the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas wrote.


The other complication with Biden’s effort to squeeze Russia out of Ukraine is his hostility to the Saudi regime. That animus was in evidence even before he took office. In his mind, Saudi is a regional, autocratic troublemaker, not simply a source of petroleum.

Animus antecedents

During a presidential campaign debate, not only did Biden label Saudi Arabia a “pariah”; he also attacked the government for human rights abuses and unwarranted military involvement in Yemen’s civil war.


Asked what he would do about it, Biden responded, “I would make it very clear we were not going to, in fact, sell more weapons to them. We were going to, in fact, make them pay the price.”


He added that there was “very little social redeeming value in the present government in Saudi Arabia.” It was a clear swipe at Prince Mohammed.

US presidential candidates often say things during campaigns that represent slaps at opponents.


On the one hand, the hard-line was a critique of Biden’s predecessor Donald Trump, who had overlooked the Khashoggi case and maintained uncritical, realpolitik-style relations with Riyadh.


By way of contrast, Biden’s harsh words about Saudi Arabia reflected a new appraisal among some advisors.


In June 2020, five months before Biden’s election, Daniel Benaim, an advisor to Biden when he served as vice-president under Barack Obama, wrote an essay entitled “A Progressive Course Correction for US-Saudi Relations” for The Century Foundation, a liberal think tank.

In it, Benaim labeled Saudi involvement in the Yemen civil war and the Khashoggi murder “ill-considered choices that have undermined US interests.” He proposed “a course correction in US-Saudi relations.”


His recommended changes included improvements in Saudi human rights performance and a reduction of negative attitudes towards Iran, with which Biden was trying to cut a nuclear weapons deal. “If Riyadh fails to do this, it can expect to see strategic cooperation with Washington grow increasingly limited,” Benaim wrote.


He also advised that Washington had an opportunity to pressure Saudi Arabia to change because the US “is not beholden to Saudi oil.” At the time, the US was self-sufficient.


In January 2021, when Biden took office, he chose Benaim as his deputy assistant secretary of state for Arabian peninsula affairs.


Soon, the administration began to act on Benaim’s convictions. Biden released a scathing report written by the US Office of National Intelligence that concluded, “We assess that Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman approved an operation in Istanbul, Turkey, to capture or kill Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.”

Biden’s spokesperson noted that Biden was not taking telephone calls from the crown prince. Then Russia invaded Ukraine. Suddenly, it was Mohammed who was not returning Biden’s phone calls, the Wall Street Journal reported last March.


Biden is promising to visit Saudi Arabia – likely in July, officials in Washington said.


The question now is whether Biden will have to effectively bow to Prince Mohammed. It’s unlikely he will follow Trump’s effusive lead by performing in a traditional Saudi sword dance at a reception in the Saudi capital.

Trump got a medal from the crown prince after saying that the Saudi leader “maybe” had nothing to do with Khashoggi’s death.


In any event, Biden’s outreach will be difficult to sell to critics who think the US has coddled autocratic Saudi Arabia for too long. Even a handshake with Prince Mohammed might prove controversial.


“A presidential trip to Saudi Arabia right now is going to be confirmation, validation, not just that it’s business as usual but that bin Salman got away with murder,” said Aaron David Miller, a Middle East expert who worked at the State Department under Presidents Bill Clinton and George W Bush.

 

jeff2

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2004
1,607
878
113
Yeah. The whole thing is embarrassing.
Didn't Biden cancel Keystone on his first day?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bazokajoe

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
I guess Joe never envisioned $5/gal. gas. As they say in the old country: those who burn bridges better know how to swim. For all his bragging about his diplomatic experience, Joe's is an horse's ass when it comes to the international diplomacy. The Saudis won't pick up his calls without some major concessions, he has no hope of negotiating with Putin and he walked America right into that conflict. Just a sad, old cadaver pretending to be someone he is clearly not. At least the electorate is beginning to see what they elected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecolt

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
I guess Joe never envisioned $5/gal. gas. As they say in the old country: those who burn bridges better know how to swim. For all his bragging about his diplomatic experience, Joe's is an horse's ass when it comes to the international diplomacy. The Saudis won't pick up his calls without some major concessions, he has no hope of negotiating with Putin and he walked America right into that conflict. Just a sad, old cadaver pretending to be someone he is clearly not. At least the electorate is beginning to see what they elected.
The concessions have already been made. The GOP have made promises. The Saudi’s are doing exactly what they have been instructed to do.

They over produced when the GOP held office to point we ran out of places to store it.

Biden gets elected, and suddenly production stops.

When the next GOP takes office, the Saudi’s will be rewarded again when the production has resumed.

The GOP are behind the high prices.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,635
1,429
113
why does Biden think Saudis are gonna throw Russia under the bus just to make LESS MONEY? IN any case, more oil is not gonna make a big diff, lack of refining capacity is responsible for at least 30-40% of the price hike in gas and diesel. To build a new refinary if you started TODAY with approvals, is a 5 year project and with a 15-20 year payback no one is gonna invest in a new one. in the USA, Canada or Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjg1

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,565
2,086
113
Ghawar
When the next GOP takes office, the Saudi’s will be rewarded again when the production has resumed.

The GOP are behind the high prices.
By the time GOP returns to power Saudi's oil production could be way
off its all time peak. My prediction may turn out to be wrong and I don't
want to be right. Climate activists will be happier than me.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
The concessions have already been made. The GOP have made promises. The Saudi’s are doing exactly what they have been instructed to do.

They over produced when the GOP held office to point we ran out of places to store it.

Biden gets elected, and suddenly production stops.

When the next GOP takes office, the Saudi’s will be rewarded again when the production has resumed.

The GOP are behind the high prices.
Another conspiracy theorist.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,388
3,050
113
Once again, Keystone is pipeline, pipelines don't produce more oil.
Canceling a pre-approved pipeline does send a message loud and clear to the companies that do produce oil

The message is
"we are going to try to shut you down"

So no sense investing money to explore and drill to maintain production of a depleting asset

So once again, the price you pay at the pump has been driven in part by foolish left wing govts who are hell bent on shutting down fossil fuels
it is ready, shoot, aim policy making by ideologues
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
Here, just for you.

Here, just for you.


 

jeff2

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2004
1,607
878
113
Once again, Keystone is pipeline, pipelines don't produce more oil.
It might have helped. Yes, you have to have oil to put in the pipeline(who would have known,lol). Do you think rail and truck is better and cheaper infrastructure for this?
 
Last edited:

mjg1

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2008
5,173
1,365
113
Canceling a pre-approved pipeline does send a message loud and clear to the companies that do produce oil

The message is
"we are going to try to shut you down"

So no sense investing money to explore and drill to maintain production of a depleting asset

So once again, the price you pay at the pump has been driven in part by foolish left wing govts who are hell bent on shutting down fossil fuels
it is ready, shoot, aim policy making by ideologues
Oh cry me a river for oil companies, for decades and decades oil companies have benefited from gov't subsidies, tax breaks and gov't land drilling rights. Do you actually believe those greedy Saudis & OPEC want to end higher energy prices, especially after oil hit rock bottom during the pandemic shutdowns. They know fossil fuels are the past and want to make as much money now as possible.
 

mjg1

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2008
5,173
1,365
113
It might have helped. Yes, you have to have oil to put in the pipeline(who would have known,lol). Do you think rail and truck is better and cheaper infrastructure for this?
Of course a pipeline is cheaper than rail or trucker, where is it written that oil companies can get everything they want. I don't think the oil companies have been treated unfairly, with all the breaks they have received throughout history!
 

Happyhomer

Well-known member
May 12, 2020
304
320
63
The cure for high oil prices is high oil prices. Consumers are already buying fully electric, hybrid electric or more fuel efficient cars. Air carriers are buying more fuel efficient planes. Gas demand will be cut by a third around the globe in 2 years and in half in 4.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
The cure for high oil prices is high oil prices. Consumers are already buying fully electric, hybrid electric or more fuel efficient cars. Air carriers are buying more fuel efficient planes. Gas demand will be cut by a third around the globe in 2 years and in half in 4.
There are roughly 6000 products that require direct ff imput. Without oil there is no farming and without farming there is no food. Without oil powered transportation that non existing food doesn't get anywhere. With the high oil prices we will not build, consume, move and in the long run, exist without sliding into abject poverty where only those with the high incomes will have access to the semi decent existence. But, sure, buy what the climate dreamers have envisioned and watch the unintended consequences hit- like runaway inflation, poverty, political instability, etc.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
There are roughly 6000 products that require direct ff imput. Without oil there is no farming and without farming there is no food. Without oil powered transportation that non existing food doesn't get anywhere. With the high oil prices we will not build, consume, move and in the long run, exist without sliding into abject poverty where only those with the high incomes will have access to the semi decent existence. But, sure, buy what the climate dreamers have envisioned and watch the unintended consequences hit- like runaway inflation, poverty, political instability, etc.
We'll likely continue using those ff on most of those products.
What we will have to do is stop burning it.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,388
3,050
113
Oh cry me a river for oil companies, for decades and decades oil companies have benefited from gov't subsidies, tax breaks and gov't land drilling rights.
Name the government program which provides these 'subsidies" to the oil companies ?

You can not because there are no subsidies

CRA Capital cost allowances allow for legitimate deductions when a oil company spends money to explore for oil , just like the CCA for an auto-parts company who spend on new technology or your company invests in a new computer system
re govt land drilling, the government collects both leases and royalties fro these

if you had a clue you would know the cashflow is from oil company to govt to the tune of billions

Do you actually believe those greedy Saudis & OPEC want to end higher energy prices, especially after oil hit rock bottom during the pandemic shutdowns.
those greedy Saudis & OPEC prefer price stability

They know fossil fuels are the past and want to make as much money now as possible.
do not fool yourself
you will using FF for the rest of your days and so will will your grandkids
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,388
3,050
113
The cure for high oil prices is high oil prices. Consumers are already buying fully electric, hybrid electric or more fuel efficient cars. Air carriers are buying more fuel efficient planes. Gas demand will be cut by a third around the globe in 2 years and in half in 4.
demand will be curtailed by a recession

your are dreaming if you think gasoline demand will be cut in half during your lifetime, let alone 4 years

the world consumes 100 million barrels of oil per day & an equivalent amount of Nat gas & coal

Per day !!!!


EVs will start to overload the electrical grids w=once they reach 15 to 20% of the market.. then it all stops abruptly
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts