Toronto Girlfriends

SCotUS majority will repudiate Roe v Wade, leaked draft reveals

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,316
5,390
113
If it fits your narrative you run it. If it doesn't fit your narrative you bury it. This is how the media works.
As I said in another post, the MSM would publish this story ASAP, while partisan outlets like Fox or Breitbart would bury it. I mean, the NYT would publish this story regardless of what the decision was. No doubt in my mind about that.

See, this is what I keep telling you people about the MSM. It isn't partisan, no matter how much the right-wing media wants to pretend it is. MSMs (with some exceptions) would publish stuff that newsworthy, regardless of how it affected the government. The right outlets would likely only publish it if it promoted their party/candidate/government or hurt the other guy. They would likely sit on the bad story, or come up with ways to spin it to mitigate any damages the story would have.

Now, I know this is falling on deaf ears (or blind eyes?). But, I pray that you might one day recognize that the MSM doesn't operate like the right-wing media. They cover all stories, even ones that might be negative to their preferred candidate or politician.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,798
9,548
113
what's with obsession for christian satire website? as a proud jew, shouldn't you consider the entire christianity to be a satire?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,292
7,182
113
Is abortion a major or the most major issue facing the majority of Americans? How many abortions are performed in the U.S. annually? If abortion is banned in the U.S., will Canada be flooded with a wave of if American abortion seekers?
The Republicans have always made it an issue ever since Roe v Wade was implemented. They highly politicized it and it was one of the promises of the previous POTUS to nominate several of his Judges to the Supreme Court so as to overturn it. So your query should be posed to the Republicans as to why they politicized it. You have to bear in mind that this will only penalize the poorest Americans who cannot get out of State to have their abortions. They include the ones that were raped and victims of child incest!!

The rich ones that want the abortion can have the procedure in several countries and not just Canada. But tell us what exactly is the reasoning behind overturning Roe v Wade?
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,798
9,548
113
But tell us what exactly is the reasoning behind overturning Roe v Wade?
I am puzzled by it. Seems like they want to galvanize the left to see what they are capable of
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,292
7,182
113
I am puzzled by it. Seems like they want to galvanize the left to see what they are capable of
Especially at a time when the Republicans looked very comfortable with the approaching mid-terms. But now the pendulum looks like it has reached its max distance to the right and has to start inching back to the centre and left of the spectrum.
 

ottawa_cuck

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2020
854
319
63
1- So it will penalize Democrat voters?
2- B/c Taxpayer funds go to abortions. So it penalizes GOP voters who would never think to have an abortion. Kinda inconvenient dont ya think?



1- You have to bear in mind that this will only penalize the poorest Americans who cannot get out of State to have their abortions. They include the ones that were raped and victims of child incest!!

The rich ones that want the abortion can have the procedure in several countries and not just Canada.

2- But tell us what exactly is the reasoning behind overturning Roe v Wade?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Butler1000

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
I am puzzled by it. Seems like they want to galvanize the left to see what they are capable of
It is religious fervor. You know that when they do not want exceptions for incest or rape.
 

ottawa_cuck

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2020
854
319
63
Everything these days is staged to :
1- stir up outrage to …
2- win elections

i thought we were supposed to go back to NORMAL with the corpse of Joe Biden
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
1- So it will penalize Democrat voters?
2- B/c Taxpayer funds go to abortions. So it penalizes GOP voters who would never think to have an abortion. Kinda inconvenient dont ya think?
I dunno which world you live in, where Democratic voters are poor and Republican voters are rich.

It is surely not USA.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,292
7,182
113
1- So it will penalize Democrat voters?
2- B/c Taxpayer funds go to abortions. So it penalizes GOP voters who would never think to have an abortion. Kinda inconvenient dont ya think?
Will it not penalize those in the lowest rung of the ladder that are victims of rape or child molestation? Are you okay with them being forced to have the child that they did not consent to have in the first place?
When 69% of the Americans are in favour of Abortions, it includes a chunk of Republicans and Independents as well. The wealthy Republicans who need it will find a way of going out of state for it!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,680
88,631
113
And maybe also because his two appointments have led to the abortion law change which set fire to the left & makes them talk about him & gives his gop base a YUGE win.
I haven’t looked at the news, but I’ll bet you he’s got a huge smile today.
And the rest of what you wrote about Trump I agree with ;)
As JTK mentioned, Trump cares about Trump and nothing else. If he thinks that the 2 judicial appointments will allow him to skim more in political contributions (which he will then grift and divert to himself) or masquerade more exorbitantly as the supposed "president", he will be happy for a day or two as he golfs, eats, farts and waddles around his tasteless golf club palace.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,643
60,755
113
No Valcazar understood. He was just asking if you believed that rights to same sex marriage or desegregation or Miranda rights or right to counsel were also misconceived. They are all judge made law from the mid Twentieth Century or later.
Exactly. (Although I do agree with him that the Canadian situation is different due to a different system.)

Isn't there a jurisdictional issue? You cannot criminalize something that takes place in someone else's jurisdiction. We can't criminalize shit that happens in Michigan for instance.

You would - arguably - have to criminalize the act of communicating in the prosecuting state for the purpose of arranging an abortion.
Already exists in Missouri, just hasn't been voted on yet.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
what's with obsession for christian satire website? as a proud jew, shouldn't you consider the entire christianity to be a satire?
As a person of Jewish persuasion I appreciate ALL humor.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,680
88,631
113
Exactly. (Although I do agree with him that the Canadian situation is different due to a different system.)
Already exists in Missouri, just hasn't been voted on yet.
Delightful.

The only way it can work in criminal law theory is if they criminalize "communicating for the purpose of obtaining an abortion" and deem the communication to have occurred in MO. I don't think they can even do it as a "criminal conspiracy" charge because that involves agreeing to participate in a criminal act and abortion in Illinois is not a criminal act.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,680
88,631
113
They don't think it is health care.
WTF do they think it is then?

Even if it's criminal law, it has no national or interstate element to found federal jurisdiction.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts