Become leader of any country especially one with a very large population and tell them to stay inside all day every day for two weeks and see how that goes. Now picture one member of each family is already infected and infects other family members. Then those two weeks have to be extended and even if we still have cases after that then what? Lockdowns are pointless period. Even the WHO said this at the beginning and yet every country still did them. Lockdowns never worked because they simply don't work period.
Saskatchewan To Drop All Proof Of Vaccination Mandates Starting Sunday Feb 13
- Thread starter Breeze
- Start date
Um...you're not making a lot of sense. Okay, tell people to stay inside. And then...picture one member of each family is already infected? Why? That seldom happens. How about picture space aliens landing and injecting covid into human specimens. I can picture lots of "convenient" things.
Countries that had effective lockdowns had lower rates of death. Bottom line is you think the tradeoff wasn't worth it -- people dying isn't worse than hurting businesses and inconveniencing citizens. Some will agree with you. Others say we should do everything we can to save lives. That's the argument fault line, that's the point of contention. How much collateral damage is acceptable?
Really who? Australia who locked down over 5 cases. Or New Zealand who is on lockdown number what 8 now
Sad that you can't figure this out and sad that you don't seem to realize that study has nothing to do with what you are asking.
Condoms are a TOTAL restriction of our freedoms. Let's start a convoy!Washing of hands is a lockdown Maybe wearing a condom is too.
