Looks like a special counsel investigation for Biden

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,324
5,427
113
Yeah, because they just give away Pulitzer Prizes, and Emmy awards for coloring books.
Sorry, what?

Are you saying Fox or Schweizer won a Pulitzer? Emmy awards are not given for journalistic integrity or for breaking big stories. A Peabody is closer to something like that, but Fox hasn't won that either.

Could you please enlighten us on which serious journalism awards has Fox won? Breitbart? Schweizer? Because, as far as I can tell....they haven't.
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,324
5,427
113
Lots of people seem to think that "Clinton Cash" was suppressed by the MSM or something.
The funny thing is, it got play in the New York Times, Washington Post, was covered by CNN, it was on the best seller list. However, when people looked at the facts, a lot of it was just innuendo. Like the Uranium One controversy. Hillary had no influence in that review. There was never any proof she touched the file or intervened. So, basically, it was just another right wing hatchet job on her. I mean, they held how many hearings on Benghazi just to hurt her politically. Kevin McCarthy admitted to that.

I should point out, I'm not exactly a fan of Hillary. But I think she was unfairly treated in 2016, and got screwed over by the media (MSM & right-wing), the FBI and of course Russia...lol.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Sorry, what?

Are you saying Fox or Schweizer won a Pulitzer? Emmy awards are not given for journalistic integrity or for breaking big stories. A Peabody is closer to something like that, but Fox hasn't won that either.

Could you please enlighten us on which serious journalism awards has Fox won? Breitbart? Schweizer? Because, as far as I can tell....they haven't.
He didn't? My mistake. 6x NYT bestselling author, Emmy winner, etc. I haven't read his latest, but those who did are predicting a Congressional investigation after the November election. Hunter's laptop itself warrants it, BTW. As for media recognition, Fox is doing something right. It has been at the top of the ratings for 20 or so years. Maybe after Discovery finishes kicking the current crop of "talent " to the unemployment line, the CNN will be able to compete.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
He didn't? My mistake. 6x NYT bestselling author, Emmy winner, etc. I haven't read his latest, but those who did are predicting a Congressional investigation after the November election. Hunter's laptop itself warrants it, BTW. As for media recognition, Fox is doing something right. It has been at the top of the ratings for 20 or so years. Maybe after Discovery finishes kicking the current crop of "talent " to the unemployment line, the CNN will be able to compete.
Hunter's laptop!
ROTFLMAO!!!!

Remember how you used to go on about Hillary and pizzagate type 'corruption' claims?
This is even funnier.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,769
113
The funny thing is, it got play in the New York Times, Washington Post, was covered by CNN, it was on the best seller list.
The New York Times and others paid to have the rights to publish storylines from it and pursue them further with their own investigations.
They did a lot of work to amplify the book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentkisser

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,324
5,427
113
He didn't? My mistake. 6x NYT bestselling author, Emmy winner, etc. I haven't read his latest, but those who did are predicting a Congressional investigation after the November election. Hunter's laptop itself warrants it, BTW. As for media recognition, Fox is doing something right. It has been at the top of the ratings for 20 or so years. Maybe after Discovery finishes kicking the current crop of "talent " to the unemployment line, the CNN will be able to compete.
First, off, best sellers and emmy awards don't mean the book is accurate. I mean, Dan Brown's DaVinci Code was a best seller and did have *some* true facts in it, but I wouldn't call it a journalistic affair. And Fox....well, I guess it's like NCIS or Law and Order. It continues to get ratings because old people don't know how to change channels...Or we could also say that just because something is popular doesn't mean its good. Look at Nickelback....

As for the GOP, if they do win in November, I'm under no illusions that they won't take up the opportunity to launch a thousand bullshit investigations just like the did with Benghazi. So, let's ask the question: What exactly did they find after all that? NOTHING! Now, I'd be interested to see how they'll try to get any legitimacy in investigating the laptop.

You just repeatedly show that you can't tell the difference between real journalism and the make believe and wishful thinking that Fox employs.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,237
7,116
113

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,324
5,427
113
The New York Times and others paid to have the rights to publish storylines from it and pursue them further with their own investigations.
They did a lot of work to amplify the book.
I had forgotten about that. And of course, the NYT bestseller list can be manipulated...Like when Don Jr. released his latest book. They had to put a asterisk there to show that several thousands of copies were from a bulk purchase, which ended up being given away to people who made a donation to Trump. I mean, who would spend money on a book by Don Jr.?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Breitbart is the "Special Counsel". OIC, and Pelosi will be appointing Breitbart?? When jcpro??
There won't be any pelosi this time next year- not in a position of any importance. But, there will be an investigation into business dealings of the Biden family. There will be a separate investigation into Fauci and his Chinese connections, BTW. You know it's coming....
 

HungSowel

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2017
2,837
1,718
113
If a book translates to a special counsel investigation then a movie would mean impeachment?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
There won't be any pelosi this time next year- not in a position of any importance. But, there will be an investigation into business dealings of the Biden family. There will be a separate investigation into Fauci and his Chinese connections, BTW. You know it's coming....
Yes, its going to be so devastating!
Just like the results of yelling 'lock her up' were with all those Clinton investigations while Trump had the power to do so.

Yawn.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,507
6,719
113
Lots of people seem to think that "Clinton Cash" was suppressed by the MSM or something.
A lot easier than admitting that the brietbart article is just the site promoting a book that profits on of its own people.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,237
7,116
113
There won't be any pelosi this time next year- not in a position of any importance. But, there will be an investigation into business dealings of the Biden family. There will be a separate investigation into Fauci and his Chinese connections, BTW. You know it's coming....
Okay, I will hold you accountable to that statement. But keep on picking at straws, just like "Lock Her Up". Trump is in deeper shit at the moment with the Committee Investigating the January 6th Insurrection. LOL!!
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,769
113
I do think jcpro is right that if the House and/or Senate is taken over by the GOP, they will launch investigations.
They have said that repeatedly and showed during the Obama years that they view investigations as purely partisan ways to try and drive down support for specific politicians.
The book is just seeding the ground for that.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
I do think jcpro is right that if the House and/or Senate is taken over by the GOP, they will launch investigations.
They have said that repeatedly and showed during the Obama years that they view investigations as purely partisan ways to try and drive down support for specific politicians.
The book is just seeding the ground for that.
Think they'll be angrier than under rump?
None of those investigations did anything.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,769
113
Think they'll be angrier than under rump?
None of those investigations did anything.
They didn't need investigations when they had the trifecta - who were they going to dirty up?
The investigations under Obama were very effective - the whole point of Benghazi was to drive Clinton's numbers down and it did that well.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
They didn't need investigations when they had the trifecta - who were they going to dirty up?
The investigations under Obama were very effective - the whole point of Benghazi was to drive Clinton's numbers down and it did that well.
Then lets see where the Jan 6 investigations go first and what they do for the GOP numbers.
 

KDK13

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2022
935
1,332
93
Clinton's hounded for a generation.
Benghazi - 11 investigations, and they admitted it was to knock down her approval ratings.

Michelle Malkin published a book like this in the OP arguing that the Obama administration was the most corrupt ever. Book was published one month after Obama took office. Thus it was written before he took office. (Obama had cleanest admin ever, after 8 years, btw).
Thus, more of the same BS.
 
Toronto Escorts