Actually .... it was I.Lots of people seem to think that "Clinton Cash" was suppressed by the MSM or something.
Actually .... it was I.Lots of people seem to think that "Clinton Cash" was suppressed by the MSM or something.
Sorry, what?Yeah, because they just give away Pulitzer Prizes, and Emmy awards for coloring books.
The funny thing is, it got play in the New York Times, Washington Post, was covered by CNN, it was on the best seller list. However, when people looked at the facts, a lot of it was just innuendo. Like the Uranium One controversy. Hillary had no influence in that review. There was never any proof she touched the file or intervened. So, basically, it was just another right wing hatchet job on her. I mean, they held how many hearings on Benghazi just to hurt her politically. Kevin McCarthy admitted to that.Lots of people seem to think that "Clinton Cash" was suppressed by the MSM or something.
He didn't? My mistake. 6x NYT bestselling author, Emmy winner, etc. I haven't read his latest, but those who did are predicting a Congressional investigation after the November election. Hunter's laptop itself warrants it, BTW. As for media recognition, Fox is doing something right. It has been at the top of the ratings for 20 or so years. Maybe after Discovery finishes kicking the current crop of "talent " to the unemployment line, the CNN will be able to compete.Sorry, what?
Are you saying Fox or Schweizer won a Pulitzer? Emmy awards are not given for journalistic integrity or for breaking big stories. A Peabody is closer to something like that, but Fox hasn't won that either.
Could you please enlighten us on which serious journalism awards has Fox won? Breitbart? Schweizer? Because, as far as I can tell....they haven't.
Hunter's laptop!He didn't? My mistake. 6x NYT bestselling author, Emmy winner, etc. I haven't read his latest, but those who did are predicting a Congressional investigation after the November election. Hunter's laptop itself warrants it, BTW. As for media recognition, Fox is doing something right. It has been at the top of the ratings for 20 or so years. Maybe after Discovery finishes kicking the current crop of "talent " to the unemployment line, the CNN will be able to compete.
The New York Times and others paid to have the rights to publish storylines from it and pursue them further with their own investigations.The funny thing is, it got play in the New York Times, Washington Post, was covered by CNN, it was on the best seller list.
First, off, best sellers and emmy awards don't mean the book is accurate. I mean, Dan Brown's DaVinci Code was a best seller and did have *some* true facts in it, but I wouldn't call it a journalistic affair. And Fox....well, I guess it's like NCIS or Law and Order. It continues to get ratings because old people don't know how to change channels...Or we could also say that just because something is popular doesn't mean its good. Look at Nickelback....He didn't? My mistake. 6x NYT bestselling author, Emmy winner, etc. I haven't read his latest, but those who did are predicting a Congressional investigation after the November election. Hunter's laptop itself warrants it, BTW. As for media recognition, Fox is doing something right. It has been at the top of the ratings for 20 or so years. Maybe after Discovery finishes kicking the current crop of "talent " to the unemployment line, the CNN will be able to compete.
Breitbart is the "Special Counsel". OIC, and Pelosi will be appointing Breitbart?? When jcpro??Peter Schweizer’s ‘Red-Handed’ Hits #1 on New York Times Bestseller List
Peter Schweizer’s blockbuster new book "Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win" hit number one on the New York Times’ bestseller list, one week after its release by HarperCollins.www.breitbart.com
I had forgotten about that. And of course, the NYT bestseller list can be manipulated...Like when Don Jr. released his latest book. They had to put a asterisk there to show that several thousands of copies were from a bulk purchase, which ended up being given away to people who made a donation to Trump. I mean, who would spend money on a book by Don Jr.?The New York Times and others paid to have the rights to publish storylines from it and pursue them further with their own investigations.
They did a lot of work to amplify the book.
There won't be any pelosi this time next year- not in a position of any importance. But, there will be an investigation into business dealings of the Biden family. There will be a separate investigation into Fauci and his Chinese connections, BTW. You know it's coming....Breitbart is the "Special Counsel". OIC, and Pelosi will be appointing Breitbart?? When jcpro??
Yes, its going to be so devastating!There won't be any pelosi this time next year- not in a position of any importance. But, there will be an investigation into business dealings of the Biden family. There will be a separate investigation into Fauci and his Chinese connections, BTW. You know it's coming....
A lot easier than admitting that the brietbart article is just the site promoting a book that profits on of its own people.Lots of people seem to think that "Clinton Cash" was suppressed by the MSM or something.
Okay, I will hold you accountable to that statement. But keep on picking at straws, just like "Lock Her Up". Trump is in deeper shit at the moment with the Committee Investigating the January 6th Insurrection. LOL!!There won't be any pelosi this time next year- not in a position of any importance. But, there will be an investigation into business dealings of the Biden family. There will be a separate investigation into Fauci and his Chinese connections, BTW. You know it's coming....
Think they'll be angrier than under rump?I do think jcpro is right that if the House and/or Senate is taken over by the GOP, they will launch investigations.
They have said that repeatedly and showed during the Obama years that they view investigations as purely partisan ways to try and drive down support for specific politicians.
The book is just seeding the ground for that.
They didn't need investigations when they had the trifecta - who were they going to dirty up?Think they'll be angrier than under rump?
None of those investigations did anything.
Then lets see where the Jan 6 investigations go first and what they do for the GOP numbers.They didn't need investigations when they had the trifecta - who were they going to dirty up?
The investigations under Obama were very effective - the whole point of Benghazi was to drive Clinton's numbers down and it did that well.