Kyle Rittenhouse speaks to Tucker Carlson in first TV interview
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
- Status
I did watch the trial. There was alot of information and sometimes it is easy to get details mixed up.
I dont get why you guys feel the need to be rude to someone who does not agree with your opinion.
It's over now so I'm not sure why you guys care so much . He's free , right ? That's what you guys wanted , right ? So what is the point of arguing with people ?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion . In my eyes he should have been found guilty.
I admitted to getting details mixed up. I'm human , Sue me .
There is no need to insult me or degrade me just because of a difference of opinion. Anyways . You guys carry on . My opinion is unchanged. He should have been convicted of murder. The states laws are fucked. Have a nice evening gentleman.
While the same general group has talked about overturning the constitution and the direct view of the founders by turning it into a religious state.
Actually, no. You've been serially lied to by Far right internet - as usual. Sandmann appears to have received peanuts in his settlement against the WaPo and others. It was all a big, big build-up by Rightie media and Lin Wood and fuck all payoff for the kid - who was used and milked in the classic rightie grift style.
Law and Crime estimates the settlement was about $50,000 and I'm betting it all went to Lin Wood's latest luxury car payments and the kid saw fuck-all a penny of that $$$$. Because the grift must always go on in Rightie-world.
Throw in that KR has some serious skellies in the closet and I doubt that anyone is going to sue a fuck-turtle on his behalf. And besides, KR kicked the main rightie law-grifters Wood and Pierce out and called them out publicly for incompetence and mega-griftery at KR's expense on Fucker's show.
How Much Did Nick Sandmann Get from the Washington Post? | Law & Crime
Several lawyers say the settlement was most likely a business decision that had nothing to do with the merits of Sandmann's case.
Last edited:
Do not forget that these same alt right individuals on this Board were scathingly attacking someone as young as Great Thunberg for her role in trying to save the Planet from Climate Change. They attacked for not being at school so that she can get an "education". Did Greta physically hurt anyone or kill people in "self defence"?? But suddenly a kid who was known to have slapped some girl on the street in a confrontation, and then went out of State where he killed two protesters and injured another one is their hero, especially as he has dropped out of school!!
Do not forget that these same alt right individuals on this Board were scathingly attacking someone as young as Great Thunberg for her role in trying to save the Planet from Climate Change. They attacked for not being at school so that she can get an "education". Did Greta physically hurt anyone or kill people in "self defence"?? But suddenly a kid who was known to have slapped some girl on the street in a confrontation, and then went out of State where he killed two protesters and injured another one is their hero, especially as he has dropped out of school!!
Can you post the proof of your allegations of girl being slapped ?
You mean we went out of state and defended himself . The two attackers were the makes of their own demise .
I guess you may have to drop out of school if you are facing threats and a life sentence .
It's been worrying to hear people involved in protests talk about how Grosskreutz's mistake was not shooting Rittenhouse.
Grosskreutz testified he drew on Rittenhouse and decided he wasn't a threat.
Too many people in protest spaces concluding that was the mistake.
Once guns are out, someone else with a gun is going to perceive you as a threat.
Rittenhouse just saw a guy with a gun on him, not someone who had decided not to shoot him.
If Grosskreutz had just shot him, he would have had the plausible self defense claim since Rittenhouse had just shot two people and was walking around with a gun.
Since protesters expect more people "inspired" by Rittenhouse since he is being proclaimed a hero, the advice going around on some channels is that it will be better to shoot first.
Hopefully these hotheads get talked down, or the next round of protests is going to get much worse with shooters on all sides.
Grosskreutz testified he drew on Rittenhouse and decided he wasn't a threat.
Too many people in protest spaces concluding that was the mistake.
Once guns are out, someone else with a gun is going to perceive you as a threat.
Rittenhouse just saw a guy with a gun on him, not someone who had decided not to shoot him.
If Grosskreutz had just shot him, he would have had the plausible self defense claim since Rittenhouse had just shot two people and was walking around with a gun.
Since protesters expect more people "inspired" by Rittenhouse since he is being proclaimed a hero, the advice going around on some channels is that it will be better to shoot first.
Hopefully these hotheads get talked down, or the next round of protests is going to get much worse with shooters on all sides.
The problem is the escalation.
If Rittenhouse gets acquitted on a self-defence plea, then some even dumber kid is going to carry a gun to a protest and think that it's fine "because Kyle got found not guilty". And some even dumber kid - or adult - on the other side of the line is going to figure that more people are carrying guns and you can get off on a self-defence plea; so he's got to carry a gun as well. And the spiral continues.
And soon somebody gets shot - and it may or may not be self-defence when it gets to court. And the guy who pulled the trigger may or may not be as shiny in front of the jury as Rittenhouse. But there are going to be dead bodies in the street whether or not the shooter does time. And whether or not he shines in court.
Somebody told James Field that if protestors block a motorist's right of way in the street, he has the legal right to run them over and kill them. Dumb people believe a lot of dumb shit and dumb people act on that dumb shit. And when THAT happens, you get dead people in the street.
It's nice NOT to have dead people lying in the street. Call it a societal goal.
And that's a lot bigger than whether you think Rittenhouse is a good kid or a bad kid or something in between.
If it was difficult to find, I'd agree with what you say.
But you must be the last person in North America NOT to have seen him tee off on her. So you're missing something and you better catch up. Don't want to be the last one at the dinner table, do you?
He didn't shoot him because KR blew his muscle off . He couldn't pull the trigger .
That was after.
Grosskreutz thought Rittenhouse might be an active shooter and advanced on him gun drawn. He then decides not to fire, says he had hands raised (while admitting he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse during all this chaos).
The Prosecutor even asked him why he didn't shoot Rittenhouse first.
Unfortunately, there are people drawing the conclusion that his mistake was exactly that, not shooting first.
If he had shot first, it would have probably also been legitimate self defense under Wisconsin law.
I already posted it in the thread that was closed. So Google it for once!!
This Rittenhouse individual had already dropped out of school prior to him killing those two protesters.
So are you saying that he was threatened during his schooling days and hence had to drop out? Really!! Why was he threatened??
- Status
