TERB In Need of a Banner

Rittenhouse could have potential defamation case against Biden over White supremacist tweet, expert says

Cantaro

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2016
2,445
1,519
113
Maybe, but I don't think they could do it while Crazy Joe is president

His mother, Wendy Rittenhouse, said she believes Biden cast her son as a White supremacist for votes


Kyle Rittenhouse could potentially have a defamation case against President Biden over a tweet suggesting Rittenhouse was a White supremacist, a lawyer who represented former Covington Catholic High School student Nicholas Sandmann told Fox News.

Todd McMurtry, who helped Sandmann reach a settlement with CNN over a defamation lawsuit, said Biden could be held accountable for the Sept. 30, 2020 social media post weeks before he was elected.

"There’s no other way to put it: the President of the United States refused to disavow white supremacists on the debate stage last night," Biden's tweet said.

The remarks were accompanied by a video showing White nationalists marching in Charlottesville, Virginia, and other images. A voice-over of Fox News' Chris Wallace is heard asking then-President Trump during a presidential debate if he was willing to condemn White supremacists and militia groups.

At one point in the video, an image of Rittenhouse shows him holding an AR-style rifle on the night he killed two protesters and wounded a third in Kenosha, Wisconsin, during unrest after the police shooting of Jacob Blake a month earlier.

"What you take from that tweet is that Kyle Rittenhouse was using his rifle and engaging in White supremacist misconduct so it's actionable," McMurtry told Fox News. "Not necessarily going to win, but it's actionable."

A Kenosha County jury acquitted Rittenhouse on Friday of all the charges against him, including first-degree intentional homicide and recklessly endangering safety.

McMurtry noted Biden was not president at the time of the tweet, meaning he would not have any presidential or congressional immunity. Rittenhouse's mother, Wendy Rittenhouse, told "Hannity" last week that Biden cast her son as a White supremacist for votes.

"When I saw that I was shocked, I was angry. President Biden don't know my son whatsoever, and he's not a White supremacist," she said. "He's not a racist. And [Biden] did that for the votes. And I was so angry for a while at him and what he did to my son. He defamed him."

During an appearance on Fox News' "America Reports," Leo Terrell, a civil rights lawyer and Fox News contributor, said Biden had no facts to justify his remarks.

"Let me give Joe Biden advice: Be very careful what you say because you’re subject to a possible defamation lawsuit," Terrell said after the verdict. "This was a statement that Joe Biden is going to have to pay for and justify."

The reactions against Rittenhouse and McMurtry's former client have parallels: both were minors and were private figures, McMurtry said. To hold someone liable for defamation against a private figure, lawyers would only have to prove negligence on the part of whomever made the defamatory statement as opposed to actual malice, a higher burden of proof for public figures such as celebrities and elected officials, McMurtry said.

Sandmann, a Kentucky resident, and CNN settled a $250 million defamation lawsuit in January 2020 over the network's coverage of his viral confrontation with a Native American man in Washington D.C. A video clip showed Sandmann wearing a "MAGA" hat around his classmates and smiling at Nathan Phillips, who was beating a drum and singing at the Lincoln Memorial.

Many media outlets portrayed the incident as being racially charged before additional footage appeared to show a group of Black Hebrew Israelites had provoked the confrontation.

"I think Rittenhouse may be able to do the same thing when commentators on MSNBC say he's a school shooter, a White supremacist, even a vigilante," McMurtry said of a lawsuit against media outlets. "Lots of media people said he was a murderer, and I think that's actionable because that suggests that he committed a crime, and we now know that he didn't."

"When you just throw this stuff out there, you take risks," he added.

 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,062
3,616
113
Yesh, little Shittenhouse has wrongly been portrayed as someone who executed 2 people while rampaging through the darkened night of a foreign city with a machine gun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeanGary Diablo

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
  • Haha
Reactions: The Oracle

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113

contact

Well-known member
Aug 1, 2012
3,629
988
113
Yesh, little Shittenhouse has wrongly been portrayed as someone who executed 2 people while rampaging through the darkened night of a foreign city with a machine gun.
Kyle didn’t execute anyone he was attacked and legally defended himself the courts of ruled us I know you have some strange fear of guns and this case really bothers you but the fact is the courts ruled it’s legal

There were no machine guns involved

This is been pointed out to you multiple times yet you continue to lie about it
 
Last edited:

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Not likely since he didn’t break any laws and even if he does he has no assets what lawyers gonna try and take a case against someone who has no money
They will try to go after his future earnings. The family of one of the "victims"- I don't remember if it was the child molester or wife beater, is already looking to cash in. The way this works, they will force KR to go after the defamers just to pay his legal fees. It's a sclerotic system in America. When an individual is acquitted by the jury, the civil suit should not be allowed as it requires lower threshold for conviction.
 

contact

Well-known member
Aug 1, 2012
3,629
988
113
They will try to go after his future earnings. The family of one of the "victims"- I don't remember if it was the child molester or wife beater, is already looking to cash in. The way this works, they will force KR to go after the defamers just to pay his legal fees. It's a sclerotic system in America. When an individual is acquitted by the jury, the civil suit should not be allowed as it requires lower threshold for conviction.
Get that but will have to look at Wisconsin law because it may protect you from civil suit if you found innocent in a self-defense case
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Oracle

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Get that but will have to look at Wisconsin law because it may protect you from civil suit if you found innocent in a self-defense case
I hope so, KR has been through enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Oracle

contact

Well-known member
Aug 1, 2012
3,629
988
113
I hope so, KR has been through enough.
Now I wonder do you think the prosecutors going to charge the people who attacked Rittenhouse?particularly the guy who had the 9 mm pistol and an expired CCW because that would be a felony use of a firearm while committing a crime then there’s drop kick guy Who they didn’t have testify because his background was so sketchy he would’ve been destroyed on the stand
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Now I wonder do you think the prosecutors going to charge the people who attacked Rittenhouse?particularly the guy who had the 9 mm pistol and an expired CCW because that would be a felony use of a firearm while committing a crime then there’s drop kick guy Who they didn’t have testify because his background was so sketchy he would’ve been destroyed on the stand
In a just world, sure. But, simply going by the DA's judgment , I doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fall and contact

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,045
5,430
113
Lewiston, NY
Yesh, little Shittenhouse has wrongly been portrayed as someone who executed 2 people while rampaging through the darkened night of a foreign city with a machine gun.
Now, now. An assault rifle, but not a machine gun. A lot of people, including cops, are lucky the little fucker couldn't go fully auto...
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,062
3,616
113
Now, now. An assault rifle, but not a machine gun. A lot of people, including cops, are lucky the little fucker couldn't go fully auto...
Yesh, I keep forgetting that an assault rifle strapped to the hyperventilating pubescent chest of a little sniveling fat fucker, out of shape/out of state/out of his mind, pretend paramedic/firefighter/mall cop that can fire 4 full metal jacket bullets in 0.7 seconds is not a machine gun.

As that sniveling, hyperventilating rampaging, murdering little shit would say:

"My bad"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dave58
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts