Yep, look at all the low-tech 'woke' changes.
www.armytimes.com
www.thedrive.com
Sure people can go to lengths and find ways to kill but if there's already a gun in the house ...
And one of the major issues I have with US carry and self defence laws. Basically anyone with a gun can claim that the other person with a gun posed an imminent threat.
You do realize many states you have to take safety course to get a carry permit even if you don’t your photograph and fingerprints are taken and run through the FBI database
Van attacker in Toronto did a pretty good job without a gun ( and no I’m not for what he did)
Why would you be against home storage the statistics don’t support they’re a danger being at home. guns used in crimes handguns are generally smuggled in from the United States
And oddly enough, somehow we have far lower rates of violent crime that you guys. Strange, huh?
Again wrong firearms are designed to fire a projectile that’s all it’s designed to do,the user decides what that projectile is pointed at
We have what 350 million to Canada’s what 35-40 million people
Apparently the prosecutors now want to try to get a conviction for blahblahblah because they know they aren't going to get their first degree homicide charge. The Judge apparently also thinks it's appropriate for the jury consider a conviction for blahblahblah.
www.cnn.com
And what's more compelling is that he was running from that person as well........
Thankfully, my martini is drier than you my fellow TERB member.Yep, look at all the low-tech 'woke' changes.
.The Army’s M4, M16 and SAW replacement is on its way
The Army now has to pick which vendor will build the weapon.
The Army Plans To Fire Its Version Of The Navy's SM-6 Missile From This Launcher
The Army will field ground-launched SM-6s and Tomahawk cruise missiles using a launcher that the Navy has also tested on an unmanned boat.
This has got to be one of the most obtuse arguments ever. If they only fired a white bean that has a virtually zero chance of injuring someone, but once you add dum dum bullets you know guns are intended to be lethal.
Not really. I think most of us critical thinkers see this "Asian food" joke as a silly attempt at humor not a racist slur.Kyle Rittenhouse trial: Judge’s off-colour ‘Asian food’ joke draws more scrutiny onto courtroom comments
Judge’s ‘Asian food’ joke draws more scrutiny onto Rittenhouse trial comments
Heightened scrutiny into judge’s behaviour follows high-profile case intertwining issues of white vigilantism, the Second Amendment and criminal justicewww.independent.co.uk
Proof they got a racist judge in there. This whole trial is a sham.
Your absolute lack of knowledge about firearms shows If you want to be taken seriously in this argument you might want to actually know a few things before commenting
Your examples quite nicely illustrate my point. When someone drives drunk, the liquor isn't blamed, nor the car. There are no calls to ban liquor (nobody needs it, so there we could very well ban it) nor is there a call to ban cars (again, nobody needs them; we have busses, trains and feet). The blame goes on the person who used the car and the liquor in an irresponsible manner. I suspect that if you tally up all the harm done by misused cars and misused alcohol you'd find it significantly outweighs the number of people who have been shot.
Charging the jury on lesser offences is pretty standard.Apparently the prosecutors now want to try to get a conviction for blahblahblah because they know they aren't going to get their first degree homicide charge. The Judge apparently also thinks it's appropriate for the jury consider a conviction for blahblahblah.
What the fuck can I say? Dial it down on social media because you never know when your statements will be thrown back at you by fluid events and blahblahblah.
The judge in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial is considering lesser charges. Here's what that means
The judge in the homicide trial of Kyle Rittenhouse met with attorneys Friday morning for a conference on jury instructions, telling Rittenhouse that presenting lesser offenses to the jury lowers the possibility of a second trial but increases the risk of a conviction.
