Iran still enriching to 60%

[basketcase]

Nothing new here.
This just demands a repeat.
...

Yes it does.

Enriching to 60% which has absolutely no civilian use.
Producing Uranium metal which has almost no civilian use.
Ejecting IAEA inspectors.
Having undeclared sites discovered by the IAEA.
Installing more and more advanced centrifuges despite having only one civilian reactor.
Enriching enough 3% and 20% fuel that it would take decades for their civilian reactor (and obsolete research reactor) to use.
Refusing to return to the original deal.
Freezing all negotiations for a new deal.

But you're okay with that because Iran has promised Israel will be eliminated.

 

[Frankfooter]

But you're okay with that because Iran has promised Israel will be eliminated.

This is a blatant lie.
I have never said anything of the sort.
Retract it and admit you are lying.

 

[Happyhomer]

I’m sure the Ayatollah will be very responsible with his nuclear weapons.

Iran is only developing a nuclear arsenal as a deterrent from the evil Satan USA and its satanic allies. I’m sure a drawing of the holy prophet would not set them off.

 

[Frankfooter]

I’m sure the Ayatollah will be very responsible with his nuclear weapons.

Iran is only developing a nuclear arsenal as a deterrent from the evil Satan USA and its satanic allies. I’m sure a drawing of the holy prophet would not set them off.

If they were, it wouldn't be surprising considering how often they get attacked already.
But the IAEA says they aren't.

Gantz urges action against Iran ‘right now’ in response to deadly drone attack

Defense minister warns that Tehran has 'hundreds' of UAVs in the Middle East that could be used in more attacks, says Jewish state will remove any threat to it

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[Happyhomer]

Really? You are saying poor innocent Iran gets attacked and bullied. You must be an agent of Iran to actually believe that Iran is the non-aggressor in almost all of its conflicts.

 

[basketcase]

This is a blatant lie.
I have never said anything of the sort.
Retract it and admit you are lying.

Have you learned how to read yet? Iran are the ones who say it repeatedly which is the only reason you refuse to criticize them.

 

[basketcase]

If they were, it wouldn't be surprising considering how often they get attacked already.
But the IAEA says they aren't.

Gantz urges action against Iran ‘right now’ in response to deadly drone attack

Defense minister warns that Tehran has 'hundreds' of UAVs in the Middle East that could be used in more attacks, says Jewish state will remove any threat to it

www.timesofisrael.com

Funny that your evidence" you use to prove Iran is being attacked is actually a report about Iran targeting a civilian ship simply because the ship is owned by an Israeli company.

 

[Frankfooter]

Have you learned how to read yet? Iran are the ones who say it repeatedly which is the only reason you refuse to criticize them.

You claimed I was ok with that.
That is a lie you refuse to apologize for.
Typical.

Funny that your evidence" you use to prove Iran is being attacked is actually a report about Iran targeting a civilian ship simply because the ship is owned by an Israeli company.

The report is an allegation by Israel, who has apparently targeted 12 Iranian ships since 2019, that Iran was behind this attack.
Of course you believe everything Israel and the IDF claim.

WSJ News Exclusive | Israeli Strikes Target Iranian Oil Bound for Syria

The Israeli campaign at sea marks a new dimension in the country’s campaign to counter Iran’s military and economic entrenchment and its support of allied groups in the region.

www.wsj.com

 

[basketcase]

You claimed I was ok with that.
That is a lie you refuse to apologize for.
...

Why would I think you're okay with Iran's program just because you keep saying there's nothing wrong with what they're doing and trying to blame Israel?

Just a reminder of the things you've chosen not to criticize
Enriching to 60% which has absolutely no civilian use.
Producing Uranium metal which has almost no civilian use.
Ejecting IAEA inspectors.
Having undeclared sites discovered by the IAEA.
Installing more and more advanced centrifuges despite having only one civilian reactor.
Enriching enough 3% and 20% fuel that it would take decades for their civilian reactor (and obsolete research reactor) to use.
Refusing to return to the original deal.
Freezing all negotiations for a new deal.

The report is an allegation by Israel, who has apparently targeted 12 Iranian ships since 2019, that Iran was behind this attack.
Of course you believe everything Israel and the IDF claim.

You're the one who posted it (while supporting an Israeli company despite your support for BDS).

 

[Frankfooter]

Why would I think you're okay with Iran's program just because you keep saying there's nothing wrong with what they're doing and trying to blame Israel?

Just a reminder of the things you've chosen not to criticize
Enriching to 60% which has absolutely no civilian use.
Producing Uranium metal which has almost no civilian use.
Ejecting IAEA inspectors.
Having undeclared sites discovered by the IAEA.
Installing more and more advanced centrifuges despite having only one civilian reactor.
Enriching enough 3% and 20% fuel that it would take decades for their civilian reactor (and obsolete research reactor) to use.
Refusing to return to the original deal.
Freezing all negotiations for a new deal.

Which one of those has Israel ever allowed?

 

[basketcase]

From the neo-con war mongers at the Guardian.

West to decide on Iran censure after damning UN nuclear watchdog report

IAEA says new hardline government in Tehran making oversight of nuclear programme impossible

www.theguardian.com

Seems that European leaders are getting frustrated by Iran's refusal to play ball. Since the previous IAEA report, Iran has quadrupled its stock of 60% enriched, increased its stock of 20% by 30% and continues to block IAEA inspectors or answer their questions about undeclared sites where nuclear material was detected.

And Iran's response to European concern is to say 'If you criticize our clearly inflammatory nuclear activity, we'll become even more inflammatory'.

 

[Frankfooter]

From the neo-con war mongers at the Guardian.

West to decide on Iran censure after damning UN nuclear watchdog report

IAEA says new hardline government in Tehran making oversight of nuclear programme impossible

www.theguardian.com

Seems that European leaders are getting frustrated by Iran's refusal to play ball. Since the previous IAEA report, Iran has quadrupled its stock of 60% enriched, increased its stock of 20% by 30% and continues to block IAEA inspectors or answer their questions about undeclared sites where nuclear material was detected.

And Iran's response to European concern is to say 'If you criticize our clearly inflammatory nuclear activity, we'll become even more inflammatory'.

Fake news, Iran didn't have a stock of 60%, so by 'quadruple' its just now they have some.

Netanyahu started crying wolf about Iran building nukes in 1992.
You think its really happening this time?
Why do you want someone to start a war with Iran so much?

Benjamin Netanyahu's Long History of Crying Wolf About Iran's Nuclear Weapons

The Israeli Prime Minister is expected to warn the U.S. Congress an Iranian bomb is imminent — just as he warned in 1992, 1995, 2002, 2009, and 2012.

theintercept.com

 

[basketcase]

Fake news, Iran didn't have a stock of 60%, so by 'quadruple' its just now they have some.

Netanyahu started crying wolf about Iran building nukes in 1992.
You think its really happening this time?
Why do you want someone to start a war with Iran so much?

Benjamin Netanyahu's Long History of Crying Wolf About Iran's Nuclear Weapons

The Israeli Prime Minister is expected to warn the U.S. Congress an Iranian bomb is imminent — just as he warned in 1992, 1995, 2002, 2009, and 2012.

theintercept.com

What a surprise. You now think that the IAEA and the Guardian are lying. Sorry but refusing to actually read the news doesn't excuse you for being incredibly wrong.

UN watchdog: Iran has quadrupled its stocks of 60%-enriched uranium since May

IAEA also warns its ability to assess Iran's nuclear activities is 'seriously undermined' because Tehran is blocking its access to monitoring equipment

www.timesofisrael.com

The agency said that it estimates Iran’s stock of uranium enriched to up to 60% fissile purity at 10 kilograms, an increase of 7.6 kilograms since May. The country’s stockpile of uranium enriched to up to 20% fissile purity is now estimated at 84.3 kilograms, up from 62.8 kilograms three months earlier.



What is it about Iran that has you constantly defending them for the indefensible (other than the obvious, they want Israel gone as much as you do)?

 

[Frankfooter]

What a surprise. You now think that the IAEA and the Guardian are lying

Bad news, basketcase.
Iran negotiated a resumption of inspections with the IAEA, their tough language may or may not have helped.
Even better, they made a deal to replace the cameras that Israel destroyed during their latest attacks on Iran.

IAEA and Iran reach agreement to avert nuclear deal crisis
Iran and the UN’s nuclear agency reached an agreement on Sunday and said talks will continue later this month.

Well, I'm sure you've been advocating for Israel or the US to attack Iran now for what, 29 years?
Guess you can wait a little longer for your war.

 

[Indiana]

 

[basketcase]

Bad news, basketcase.
...

Nice way to cover how inaccurate your post was. If I didn't know better, I'd think you never actually took the time to learn anything and instead just spew propaganda.

But only you imagine this is bad news. Next step is for Iran answer IAEA questions about their undeclared sites, stop its ridiculous enrichment program, and send away their 10 kg of 60% enriched and 84 kg of 20%, neither have any reasonable civilian purpose.

We still need Iran to re-enter talks about the 'deal' and their hardliner war crime President is in no rush to do so. All this deal did was to make sure Iran didn't destroy the tapes that they aren't allowing the IAEA to see.

BTW> Have you read what you much favoured Amnesty say about Iran's President?

Iran's president-elect must be investigated for crimes against humanity

Ebrahim Raisi is implicated in gross human rights violations in relation to the 1988 prison massacres

www.amnesty.org

Sounds like just the kind of guy you support, as long as they hate Israel as much as you do.

 

[HungSowel]

The original deal froze Iran's breakout period to about 1 year, it has been many years since the US broke the deal. The discussion between biden and Iran might be for it to give up what nuclear devices it has already created along with the freezing of nuclear development/weapons shit. Perhaps the situation has changed such that the original deal can not be gone back to. Once you become a pickle you can not go back to becoming a cucumber, maybe it is for the better but probably not.

 

[Frankfooter]

The original deal froze Iran's breakout period to about 1 year, it has been many years since the US broke the deal. The discussion between biden and Iran might be for it to give up what nuclear devices it has already created along with the freezing of nuclear development/weapons shit. Perhaps the situation has changed such that the original deal can not be gone back to. Once you become a pickle you can not go back to becoming a cucumber, maybe it is for the better but probably not.

The issue really is that the US pulled out and won't guarantee they'll hold up their end of the bargain. Again.
Iran signed the JCPOA, abided by its terms and then the US went and put sanctions on them anyways.
So Iran said the US killed it and stopped abiding, though they are still abiding by the NPT, just not the voluntary 'additional' JCPOA agreement.

Biden's team still won't say they'd end those sanctions, which is the whole reward of Iran signing, so they aren't signing for now.
Though talks are ongoing.

 

[Frankfooter]

Nice way to cover how inaccurate your post was. If I didn't know better, I'd think you never actually took the time to learn anything and instead just spew propaganda.

But only you imagine this is bad news. Next step is for Iran answer IAEA questions about their undeclared sites, stop its ridiculous enrichment program, and send away their 10 kg of 60% enriched and 84 kg of 20%, neither have any reasonable civilian purpose.

We still need Iran to re-enter talks about the 'deal' and their hardliner war crime President is in no rush to do so. All this deal did was to make sure Iran didn't destroy the tapes that they aren't allowing the IAEA to see.

Ah, sarcasm was too much for you. Its only bad news for warmongers like you and Israel. Otherwise, its always good news when peace talks are ongoing and treaties are signed.
Of course, as a supporter of one of 4 pariah, non-NPT states, along with North Korea and Pakistan, I'm sure you'll just call for more bombing.

Oh, the cameras? They were destroyed by one of those covert nuclear attacks on Iran you love.

BTW> Have you read what you much favoured Amnesty say about Iran's President?

Iran's president-elect must be investigated for crimes against humanity

Ebrahim Raisi is implicated in gross human rights violations in relation to the 1988 prison massacres

www.amnesty.org

Sounds like just the kind of guy you support, as long as they hate Israel as much as you do.

Sounds more like your kinda guy, basketcase. Haven't you been defending shooting protesters here for years now?

Anniversary of Gaza Great March of Return protests

One year on the devastating injuries by Israeli forces against Palestinian protesters highlight the need for an arms embargo

www.amnesty.org

Me, I'll fully support the ICC investigating the charges on Iran's leader, Israel and Hamas for targeting protesters.
But not you, you've spent 18 pages already this month, defending shooting children for protesting.
Seems to me that puts you one moral step below Iran, I don't think they are accused of shooting children.
Certainly not every Friday for a year.

 

[contact]

Ah, sarcasm was too much for you. Its only bad news for warmongers like you and Israel. Otherwise, its always good news when peace talks are ongoing and treaties are signed.
Of course, as a supporter of one of 4 pariah, non-NPT states, along with North Korea and Pakistan, I'm sure you'll just call for more bombing.

Oh, the cameras? They were destroyed by one of those covert nuclear attacks on Iran you love.



Sounds more like your kinda guy, basketcase. Haven't you been defending shooting protesters here for years now?

Anniversary of Gaza Great March of Return protests

One year on the devastating injuries by Israeli forces against Palestinian protesters highlight the need for an arms embargo

www.amnesty.org

Me, I'll fully support the ICC investigating the charges on Iran's leader, Israel and Hamas for targeting protesters.
But not you, you've spent 18 pages already this month, defending shooting children for protesting.
Seems to me that puts you one moral step below Iran, I don't think they are accused of shooting children.
Certainly not every Friday for a year.

You’re still supporting defending and attempting to justify the actions of terrorists and it’s no surprise you defend Iran which is a state sponsor of terrorism

Hamas and other Terrorists groups get a large amount of their arms and funding from Iran

I wonder how long until Frank here is praising the Taliban because they are anti-American anti-jew

Are there any terrorist groups you don’t support Frank?