Iran still enriching to 60%

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
As usual when you find your stance indefensible you try to blame Israel and claim it's an Israeli conspiracy to pretend Iran's program is a problem. Maybe you should get rid of your copy of the Protocols.

Either that or you should show a shred of consistency and admit that Iran is wrong to continue enriching to 60% are refusing to continue negotiations.
Iran is an NPT signatory in negotiations to reenter a voluntary treaty with the US.
Israel is trying to start a war.

You want war.
I want peace.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,936
1,683
113
How about Iran getting punished for doing much more than what earned then UN sanctions in the first place?
How about the US paying penalties for breaking the deal and causing Iran billions in economic damage, and also murdering a member of the Iranian military?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Iran is an NPT signatory in negotiations to reenter a voluntary treaty with the US.
Israel is trying to start a war.

You want war.
I want peace.
Wow your bullshit is desperate.

Why are you so afraid to criticize Iran? Do you think they have any legitimate reason to be enriching to 60%?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
How about the US paying penalties for breaking the deal and causing Iran billions in economic damage, and also murdering a member of the Iranian military?
Is there some kind of precedent for that?

Meanwhile there is precedent for UN sanctions for nuclear activity with absolutely no civilian justification.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Wow your bullshit is desperate.

Why are you so afraid to criticize Iran? Do you think they have any legitimate reason to be enriching to 60%?
Why do you want war with Iran so much?
Why are you so against them signing a nuclear treaty?
Why are you against peace?
Why do you support aparthied?
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,467
2,403
113
With all the other news going in ion the middle east, it seems Iran's nuclear activities are still a huge issue. The IAEA has reported that Iran i still enriching to 63% (vs 3% for commercial use). They also have failed to explain the radioactive traces found at two undeclared sites.

I think it's time for the UN to consider those sanction again.

Tell us what % Israel is enriching to.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Why do you want war with Iran so much?
Why are you so against them signing a nuclear treaty?
Why are you against peace?
Why do you support aparthied?
More of your desperation and absolutely dumb accusations to cover you completely inconsistent attempt at morals.

Iran is enriching way past any civilian purpose, has a government opposed to re-entering a deal, and refusing to continue talks.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,492
4,929
113
As usual you guys obsessively want make everything about Israel. Typical double standard whataboutism.
No, it is not. You know as well as everybody else that the only justification for Iran wanting nuclear bombs is the fact that Israel posses them and repeatedly threaten to use them.

Iran - and the rest of the world, and I believe even USA - would welcome a non-nuclear Middle East.

It is unbelievable hypocracy for you to claim that the nuclear bombs issue for Iran and Israel is unconnected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Iran is enriching way past any civilian purpose, has a government opposed to re-entering a deal, and refusing to continue talks.
Iran is willing to sign the voluntary JCPOA as soon as the US holds up their side of the bargain and agrees to end sanctions.

Why is it such a big deal for you that Iran sign this extra treaty, along with the NPT, and you don't think Israel should have to even sign the NPT?
You really are just arguing to start a war.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
No, it is not. ...
Wow. Trying to focus on Israel instead of actually examining Iran's actions is the definition about whataboutism.

p.s. When did Israel threaten to use nukes? The had them in 1973 when Syrian tanks were close to breaking through to central Israel and didn't use them then. Meanwhile Iran actively promotes the end of Israel's existence.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Iran is willing to sign the voluntary JCPOA as soon as the US holds up their side of the bargain and agrees to end sanctions.
...
It's amazing that you've been given direct statements from Iran's government saying the opposite and continue to pretend it's not true. But when have you ever taken the opinions of non-westerners seriously?

p.s. I didn't make Iran sight the NPT and I'm not stop[ping them from withdrawing. Despite your low opinion of people elsewhere in the world, they are responsible for their own choices. And most importantly, there is absolutely no excuse for enriching to 60% other than the threat of nuclear weapons.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
p.s. When did Israel threaten to use nukes? existence.

And

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
It's amazing that you've been given direct statements from Iran's government saying the opposite and continue to pretend it's not true. But when have you ever taken the opinions of non-westerners seriously?

p.s. I didn't make Iran sight the NPT and I'm not stop[ping them from withdrawing. Despite your low opinion of people elsewhere in the world, they are responsible for their own choices. And most importantly, there is absolutely no excuse for enriching to 60% other than the threat of nuclear weapons.
Right, only Israel deserves to have nukes, threaten others with them, try to sell them to apartheid South Africa, refuse to sign the NPT and get away with stealing nuclear material from the US.
We get it.
Its tribal, whatever they do, you will back it.
Apartheid? You back it.
Shoot protesters? You back it.
Settler colonialism? You back it.
NSO? You back it.

Its 'tribal', this racist zionism thing you back.
Primitive, racist, tribalism.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,492
4,929
113

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Right, only Israel deserves...
More of your whataboutism. Why do you think Iran isn't capable of making their own decisions? They are NPT signatories and therefore they have the choice to either live up to their agreement or withdraw from it.

Sadly your obsession with Israel has you justifying a massive enrichment program way beyond any civilian purposes.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
...
Interesting. You're go to is Iran threatening to destroy Israel and Netanyahu saying that if Iran tries Israel will respond?

"Those who threaten to wipe us out put themselves in a similar danger, and in any event will not achieve their goal,"

At least you now admit Iran has spent the decades since 1979 promising to eliminate the Jewish presence but despite that you still have no problem with Iran enriching uranium to 60%, ejecting IAEA inspectors, and stopping deal talks.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
They are NPT signatories and therefore they have the choice to either live up to their agreement or withdraw from it.
They are abiding by the terms of the NPT.
We are discussing the voluntary, additional JCPOA, which you and Israel are against.

While defending Israel who refuses to sign the NPT.
Hypocritical.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
They are abiding by the terms of the NPT.
...
Enriching to 60% is part of the NPT? Keep up with your excuses.

Iran are entitled to make their own choices about either ensuring their program is purely civilian or withdrawing from the NPT. I know you act like they aren't capable of making their own choices but your low opinion of middle easterners isn't reality.

p.s. Weak that you keep wanting Israel to sign the NPT even though they will be allowed to keep their nukes as an existing power.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Enriching to 60% is part of the NPT? Keep up with your excuses.

Iran are entitled to make their own choices about either ensuring their program is purely civilian or withdrawing from the NPT. I know you act like they aren't capable of making their own choices but your low opinion of middle easterners isn't reality.

p.s. Weak that you keep wanting Israel to sign the NPT even though they will be allowed to keep their nukes as an existing power.
Nothing new here.
This just demands a repeat.

They are abiding by the terms of the NPT.
We are discussing the voluntary, additional JCPOA, which you and Israel are against.

While defending Israel who refuses to sign the NPT.
Hypocritical.
 
Toronto Escorts