Ok I see the problem. I think you missed the point.
I missed the point you failed to make?
I mean, if communism is now rebranded as socialism, what happened to socialism?
You are trying to use circular reasoning to prove a distinction between communism & socialism
ie if they are one and the same, rebranding the one only leaves one, with a new name
Both are premised on more state control over peoples lives, reduced personal freedoms, more restricted media and stealing from the most successful citizens
Both will stifle, kill innovation and risk taking
Ask someone from Venezuela
It was the wealthiest country in South America
They decided to give socialism a go and now they are eating their pets to survive
It exists and is quite popular.
Yeah, human sacrifice, the inquisition, the sun revolving around the earth, bleeding and witch dunking were all quite popular
Popularity does not make something correct or suitable
Just look at the reason Justin Trudeau was elected ..... he had a famous last name. That is a terrible criteria.
CO2 as a pollutant will eventually join this list of really bad ideas widely supported
It is the basis for all life on the planet
Thus misled audiences on the meaning of socialism, green new deal, Critical race theory, role of attorney General, and we can add Obama care death panels, and in the past how tax hikes on the rich would cause economic collapse, etc etc.
Is Fox news biased ? sure, just as CNN is
One emerged as a response to the other, not sure which was first
However
Socialism is communism in a green wrapper.
The Green New Deal is an unachievable fools dream.
It is an attempt to bring in socialism via the back door via propaganda that is "the climate crisis"
If it were a true crisis as the propaganda states , it would be foolish to waste resources trying address the myriad of social agendas in the GND
Re Taxes: The left always spend more than they can bring in
The response: Steal $ from the top 1 %
Then spend more than they can bring in
The response: Steal $ from the top 10 %
Then spend more than they can bring in
The response: Steal $ from the top 20%
.............
Eventually they will get around to stealing what you have earned.
And there is nobody with any $ to take on risk and hire employees
The problem with socialist is they are always running out of other peoples money
RE: CRT is divisive and will lead to violence and chaos